BREAKING: Terrorist Attack Involving Van Striking Pedestrians in London

---

Have the perps been id'd? wrote:

Have they identified the perps? How do you know they were RECENT refugees? Based on recent history they are more likely to be British citizens whose parents immigrated in the 80s or 90s.

---

---

One of the three London Bridge 'ISIS' killers was a Pakistani-born dad of two who tricked neighbors into thinking he was a 'nice guy' by playing soccer with kids while secretly hating Western values.

---

---

markschultz25 wrote:

Beautiful White woman dead because of Islamic scumbags invading Europe:

https://i.cbc.ca/1.4145799.1496616455!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/christine-archibald-and-tyler-ferguson.jpg

---

---

Pendeho wrote:

I've yet to read, hear or see of any major Muslim cleric, Imam oor leader condemn these attacks or say enough is enough and it must end.
By not saying anything, they endorse them and nothing will change.

---

---

a lie too big wrote:

---

Pendeho wrote:

I've yet to read, hear or see of any major Muslim cleric, Imam oor leader condemn these attacks or say enough is enough and it must end.
By not saying anything, they endorse them and nothing will change.

---

^This.

When Dutch papers published cartoons depicting Mohammed, tens of thousands of Muslims gathered in protest and numerous innocent people lost their lives in several different countries. When one of the European governments (I think Norway) tried to organize a rally for Muslims against terrorism in the name of Islam some years ago, there was a turnout of around 50 in an area comprising tens if not hundreds of thousands of Muslims.

---

---

If African Americans started.. wrote:

---

Another "stan" in the making wrote:

---

Flat Stanley wrote:

Disgusted by some of the posts on here and the gloating. People have been killed for God sake have some respect.

Disgusting how Trump is trying to use this for his own political agenda. Some of you idiots need to get a grip. Over 10000 Americans killed by guns every year and nothing done about gun control. You have the homicide rate of a third world country and your worried about Muslim terror attacks. Far, far safer in Europe than your crime ridden country. Far higher chance of being murdered in the USA than western Europe yet you talk like Europe is a war zone. Totally deluded by your idiotic right wing media.

Some losers (probably born here like all the others have been so far) drove a van into people and attacked people with knives. Hardly a coordinated mastermind of a plot. Police shot them within 8 minutes. Then the media report and report it as and act of terror which is exactly what the losers want. They want to divide people and stop people living a normal life. Trump had one thing right. Stop calling them monsters and terrorists, simply call them losers. No doubt ISIS will claim they were behind it. They may be in a loose sort of way by influencing Behaviour but it's not like some head guy in Syria got on the phone and helped them carry it out and organise it.

Yes people carrying out the attacks might have family who moved here one or two generations ago but you as Americans should understand why it's important for people to be able to resettle and start a new life. Most of the people committing these attacks are young vulnerable and recently radicalized not people with a deep understanding of faith.

A guy murdered 9 people at a dinner party in Russia today. More than died in this recent incident. Best ban all Russians and stop attending dinner parties

Some http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/man-shoots-nine-people-dead-dinner-party-row-russia-moscow-a7772266.html?amp

Get some perspective. This is as much of media problem as anything. See the number of deaths by terrorism in Europe from The 70s until now. Far more were killed by terrorism in the 70s and 80s. When the IRA were murdering people we didn't ban all Irish people, or when ETA were killing people we didn't ban all Catalonian people. Normal Muslims are no more responsible for this than anyone else. I for one will go on tomorrow without worrying about a terror attack safe in the knowledge I am more likely to die by falling out of bed or being run over than be killed by an Islamic terrorist.

---

No snowflake, this is what happens when bleeding heart liberals open the borders to all muslim rapefugees. Londonistan is to be avoided.

---

It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turn out to be British born themselves. They may be the kids of immigrants but many, if not most, of the recent attacks in Europe have been perpetuated by people born in Europe of parents who immigrated decades prior to the attack.

The only reason that is pointed out by the media and others is that it does call into question the rabid anti-current immigration positions of those on the right (i.e. It's similar to the arguments the right makes against gun control in the US--that is stopping current immigration wouldn't have stopped an attack if the attackers parents immigrated decades ago, similar to the arguement that banning a particular type of weapon (assault rifle) wouldn't have stopped a particular attack).

We don't live in an era of Minority Report where you can arrest people for future crimes. If someone is a citizen of a country and they become radicalized it's hard to do anything to them--even if the authorities are aware of them--until they have committed a crime because of free speech related issues. It's also impossible to go back in time and prevent immigration from Muslim countries that occurred in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s--which is when many of the parents of recent terrorists immigrated to Europe and the US (I am thinking of the San Bernadino shootings for the US example).

The problem in Europe appears to have many parallels to the problems of violence in US ghettos--where disenfranchised people (in the US case predominantly African Americans, in the European case predominantly Muslim)--live. The difference is African Americans seem to kill each other most of the time so white America can largely ignore it versus Europe where Muslims target affluent communities (I.e. "Others") rather then "their own kind".

Americans better hope that their disenfranchised populations never figure out how much more politically beneficial it is to target the majority population or they'll be in a lot of trouble.

---

---

FredGSanford wrote:

Our PC snowflake media: Associated Press was reporting it as an "incident" most of the evening and recently was moved to call it "a possibly terror related event."
Don't want to offend anybody now do we?

---

---

Braindead liberals wrote:

---

If African Americans started.. wrote:

---

Another "stan" in the making wrote:

---

Flat Stanley wrote:

Disgusted by some of the posts on here and the gloating. People have been killed for God sake have some respect.

Disgusting how Trump is trying to use this for his own political agenda. Some of you idiots need to get a grip. Over 10000 Americans killed by guns every year and nothing done about gun control. You have the homicide rate of a third world country and your worried about Muslim terror attacks. Far, far safer in Europe than your crime ridden country. Far higher chance of being murdered in the USA than western Europe yet you talk like Europe is a war zone. Totally deluded by your idiotic right wing media.

Some losers (probably born here like all the others have been so far) drove a van into people and attacked people with knives. Hardly a coordinated mastermind of a plot. Police shot them within 8 minutes. Then the media report and report it as and act of terror which is exactly what the losers want. They want to divide people and stop people living a normal life. Trump had one thing right. Stop calling them monsters and terrorists, simply call them losers. No doubt ISIS will claim they were behind it. They may be in a loose sort of way by influencing Behaviour but it's not like some head guy in Syria got on the phone and helped them carry it out and organise it.

Yes people carrying out the attacks might have family who moved here one or two generations ago but you as Americans should understand why it's important for people to be able to resettle and start a new life. Most of the people committing these attacks are young vulnerable and recently radicalized not people with a deep understanding of faith.

A guy murdered 9 people at a dinner party in Russia today. More than died in this recent incident. Best ban all Russians and stop attending dinner parties

Some http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/man-shoots-nine-people-dead-dinner-party-row-russia-moscow-a7772266.html?amp

Get some perspective. This is as much of media problem as anything. See the number of deaths by terrorism in Europe from The 70s until now. Far more were killed by terrorism in the 70s and 80s. When the IRA were murdering people we didn't ban all Irish people, or when ETA were killing people we didn't ban all Catalonian people. Normal Muslims are no more responsible for this than anyone else. I for one will go on tomorrow without worrying about a terror attack safe in the knowledge I am more likely to die by falling out of bed or being run over than be killed by an Islamic terrorist.

---

No snowflake, this is what happens when bleeding heart liberals open the borders to all muslim rapefugees. Londonistan is to be avoided.

---

It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turn out to be British born themselves. They may be the kids of immigrants but many, if not most, of the recent attacks in Europe have been perpetuated by people born in Europe of parents who immigrated decades prior to the attack.

The only reason that is pointed out by the media and others is that it does call into question the rabid anti-current immigration positions of those on the right (i.e. It's similar to the arguments the right makes against gun control in the US--that is stopping current immigration wouldn't have stopped an attack if the attackers parents immigrated decades ago, similar to the arguement that banning a particular type of weapon (assault rifle) wouldn't have stopped a particular attack).

We don't live in an era of Minority Report where you can arrest people for future crimes. If someone is a citizen of a country and they become radicalized it's hard to do anything to them--even if the authorities are aware of them--until they have committed a crime because of free speech related issues. It's also impossible to go back in time and prevent immigration from Muslim countries that occurred in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s--which is when many of the parents of recent terrorists immigrated to Europe and the US (I am thinking of the San Bernadino shootings for the US example).

The problem in Europe appears to have many parallels to the problems of violence in US ghettos--where disenfranchised people (in the US case predominantly African Americans, in the European case predominantly Muslim)--live. The difference is African Americans seem to kill each other most of the time so white America can largely ignore it versus Europe where Muslims target affluent communities (I.e. "Others") rather then "their own kind".

Americans better hope that their disenfranchised populations never figure out how much more politically beneficial it is to target the majority population or they'll be in a lot of trouble.

---

WTF are you talking about you clueless lib-tard? ISIS is taking credit for the attack.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/04/isis-claims-london-terror-attacks-that-killed-7-police-arrest-12-in-raids.html

---

---

If African Americans started.. wrote:

It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turn out to be British born themselves. They may be the kids of immigrants but many, if not most, of the recent attacks in Europe have been perpetuated by people born in Europe of parents who immigrated decades prior to the attack.

The only reason that is pointed out by the media and others is that it does call into question the rabid anti-current immigration positions of those on the right (i.e. It's similar to the arguments the right makes against gun control in the US--that is stopping current immigration wouldn't have stopped an attack if the attackers parents immigrated decades ago, similar to the arguement that banning a particular type of weapon (assault rifle) wouldn't have stopped a particular attack).

We don't live in an era of Minority Report where you can arrest people for future crimes. If someone is a citizen of a country and they become radicalized it's hard to do anything to them--even if the authorities are aware of them--until they have committed a crime because of free speech related issues. It's also impossible to go back in time and prevent immigration from Muslim countries that occurred in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s--which is when many of the parents of recent terrorists immigrated to Europe and the US (I am thinking of the San Bernadino shootings for the US example).

The problem in Europe appears to have many parallels to the problems of violence in US ghettos--where disenfranchised people (in the US case predominantly African Americans, in the European case predominantly Muslim)--live. The difference is African Americans seem to kill each other most of the time so white America can largely ignore it versus Europe where Muslims target affluent communities (I.e. "Others") rather then "their own kind".

Americans better hope that their disenfranchised populations never figure out how much more politically beneficial it is to target the majority population or they'll be in a lot of trouble.

---

---

Scandanavian Incompetence wrote:

The Norwegians obviously aren't as good at organizing as CNN.

---

---

Scandanavian Incompetence wrote:

The Norwegians obviously aren't as good at organizing as CNN.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/shock-video-cnn-creates-fakenews-london-following-terror-attacks-stages-anti-isis-muslim-protesters/

---