Beautiful White woman dead because of Islamic scumbags invading Europe:
https://i.cbc.ca/1.4145799.1496616455
!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/christine-archibald-and-tyler-ferguson.jpg
Beautiful White woman dead because of Islamic scumbags invading Europe:
https://i.cbc.ca/1.4145799.1496616455
!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/christine-archibald-and-tyler-ferguson.jpg
Have the perps been id'd? wrote:
Have they identified the perps? How do you know they were RECENT refugees? Based on recent history they are more likely to be British citizens whose parents immigrated in the 80s or 90s.
At least one of them wasn't.
One of the three London Bridge 'ISIS' killers was a Pakistani-born dad of two who tricked neighbors into thinking he was a 'nice guy' by playing soccer with kids while secretly hating Western values.
I've yet to read, hear or see of any major Muslim cleric, Imam oor leader condemn these attacks or say enough is enough and it must end.
By not saying anything, they endorse them and nothing will change.
markschultz25 wrote:
Beautiful White woman dead because of Islamic scumbags invading Europe:
https://i.cbc.ca/1.4145799.1496616455!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/christine-archibald-and-tyler-ferguson.jpg
And you identify as a Christian???
Pendeho wrote:
I've yet to read, hear or see of any major Muslim cleric, Imam oor leader condemn these attacks or say enough is enough and it must end.
By not saying anything, they endorse them and nothing will change.
^This.
When Dutch papers published cartoons depicting Mohammed, tens of thousands of Muslims gathered in protest and numerous innocent people lost their lives in several different countries. When one of the European governments (I think Norway) tried to organize a rally for Muslims against terrorism in the name of Islam some years ago, there was a turnout of around 50 in an area comprising tens if not hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
a lie too big wrote:
Pendeho wrote:I've yet to read, hear or see of any major Muslim cleric, Imam oor leader condemn these attacks or say enough is enough and it must end.
By not saying anything, they endorse them and nothing will change.
^This.
When Dutch papers published cartoons depicting Mohammed, tens of thousands of Muslims gathered in protest and numerous innocent people lost their lives in several different countries. When one of the European governments (I think Norway) tried to organize a rally for Muslims against terrorism in the name of Islam some years ago, there was a turnout of around 50 in an area comprising tens if not hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
It's the fault of the US, isn't it obvious
If African Americans started.. wrote:
Another "stan" in the making wrote:No snowflake, this is what happens when bleeding heart liberals open the borders to all muslim rapefugees. Londonistan is to be avoided.
It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turn out to be British born themselves. They may be the kids of immigrants but many, if not most, of the recent attacks in Europe have been perpetuated by people born in Europe of parents who immigrated decades prior to the attack.
The only reason that is pointed out by the media and others is that it does call into question the rabid anti-current immigration positions of those on the right (i.e. It's similar to the arguments the right makes against gun control in the US--that is stopping current immigration wouldn't have stopped an attack if the attackers parents immigrated decades ago, similar to the arguement that banning a particular type of weapon (assault rifle) wouldn't have stopped a particular attack).
We don't live in an era of Minority Report where you can arrest people for future crimes. If someone is a citizen of a country and they become radicalized it's hard to do anything to them--even if the authorities are aware of them--until they have committed a crime because of free speech related issues. It's also impossible to go back in time and prevent immigration from Muslim countries that occurred in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s--which is when many of the parents of recent terrorists immigrated to Europe and the US (I am thinking of the San Bernadino shootings for the US example).
The problem in Europe appears to have many parallels to the problems of violence in US ghettos--where disenfranchised people (in the US case predominantly African Americans, in the European case predominantly Muslim)--live. The difference is African Americans seem to kill each other most of the time so white America can largely ignore it versus Europe where Muslims target affluent communities (I.e. "Others") rather then "their own kind".
Americans better hope that their disenfranchised populations never figure out how much more politically beneficial it is to target the majority population or they'll be in a lot of trouble.
WTF are you talking about you clueless lib-tard? ISIS is taking credit for the attack.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/04/isis-claims-london-terror-attacks-that-killed-7-police-arrest-12-in-raids.htmlFredGSanford wrote:
Our PC snowflake media: Associated Press was reporting it as an "incident" most of the evening and recently was moved to call it "a possibly terror related event."
Don't want to offend anybody now do we?
That's because early on we had no idea who had done it and why.
We had an incident here where a bin lorry went out of control and killed loads as a guy was taken ill at the wheel and mowed people down.
We didn't all shout terrorist the second it happened.
We also had a guy going nuts with a machete as he'd had a row with his girlfriend.
We didn't call that terrorism either, as it wasn't.
We just like to wait here until we have some facts.
Not every act of violence is terrorism.
This quickly became obvious it was though, with witnesses saying they were shouting about Allah and slashing throats.
It only took two hours 30 before the PM declared it an act of terror.
Braindead liberals wrote:
If African Americans started.. wrote:It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turn out to be British born themselves. They may be the kids of immigrants but many, if not most, of the recent attacks in Europe have been perpetuated by people born in Europe of parents who immigrated decades prior to the attack.
The only reason that is pointed out by the media and others is that it does call into question the rabid anti-current immigration positions of those on the right (i.e. It's similar to the arguments the right makes against gun control in the US--that is stopping current immigration wouldn't have stopped an attack if the attackers parents immigrated decades ago, similar to the arguement that banning a particular type of weapon (assault rifle) wouldn't have stopped a particular attack).
We don't live in an era of Minority Report where you can arrest people for future crimes. If someone is a citizen of a country and they become radicalized it's hard to do anything to them--even if the authorities are aware of them--until they have committed a crime because of free speech related issues. It's also impossible to go back in time and prevent immigration from Muslim countries that occurred in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s--which is when many of the parents of recent terrorists immigrated to Europe and the US (I am thinking of the San Bernadino shootings for the US example).
The problem in Europe appears to have many parallels to the problems of violence in US ghettos--where disenfranchised people (in the US case predominantly African Americans, in the European case predominantly Muslim)--live. The difference is African Americans seem to kill each other most of the time so white America can largely ignore it versus Europe where Muslims target affluent communities (I.e. "Others") rather then "their own kind".
Americans better hope that their disenfranchised populations never figure out how much more politically beneficial it is to target the majority population or they'll be in a lot of trouble.
WTF are you talking about you clueless lib-tard? ISIS is taking credit for the attack.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/04/isis-claims-london-terror-attacks-that-killed-7-police-arrest-12-in-raids.html
Bruh, ISIS claims "responsibility" for almost all terror attacks even if people where simply "inspired" by ISIS propaganda. In many recent attacks the attackers revived no material support, weapons, training, etc. from ISIS and they still claim "responsibility". That literal means nothing.
If African Americans started.. wrote:
It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turn out to be British born themselves. They may be the kids of immigrants but many, if not most, of the recent attacks in Europe have been perpetuated by people born in Europe of parents who immigrated decades prior to the attack.
The only reason that is pointed out by the media and others is that it does call into question the rabid anti-current immigration positions of those on the right (i.e. It's similar to the arguments the right makes against gun control in the US--that is stopping current immigration wouldn't have stopped an attack if the attackers parents immigrated decades ago, similar to the arguement that banning a particular type of weapon (assault rifle) wouldn't have stopped a particular attack).
We don't live in an era of Minority Report where you can arrest people for future crimes. If someone is a citizen of a country and they become radicalized it's hard to do anything to them--even if the authorities are aware of them--until they have committed a crime because of free speech related issues. It's also impossible to go back in time and prevent immigration from Muslim countries that occurred in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s--which is when many of the parents of recent terrorists immigrated to Europe and the US (I am thinking of the San Bernadino shootings for the US example).
The problem in Europe appears to have many parallels to the problems of violence in US ghettos--where disenfranchised people (in the US case predominantly African Americans, in the European case predominantly Muslim)--live. The difference is African Americans seem to kill each other most of the time so white America can largely ignore it versus Europe where Muslims target affluent communities (I.e. "Others") rather then "their own kind".
Americans better hope that their disenfranchised populations never figure out how much more politically beneficial it is to target the majority population or they'll be in a lot of trouble.
"It wouldn't surprise me if the attackers turned out to be British..."
Ha! Try again, snowflake.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/05/london-terror-attackers-profile-begins-to-emerge.htmlThe Norwegians obviously aren't as good at organizing as CNN.
Were they driving a coal roller?
Scandanavian Incompetence wrote:
The Norwegians obviously aren't as good at organizing as CNN.
A great comment from that link:
"CNN has gone from sick to totally depraved. "
Scandanavian Incompetence wrote:
The Norwegians obviously aren't as good at organizing as CNN.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/shock-video-cnn-creates-fakenews-london-following-terror-attacks-stages-anti-isis-muslim-protesters/
How is that fake news?
A group of Muslims is cooperating with CNN and other media groups to spread the message that terrorism won't be tolerated.
They are going around to different locations with the media and combating the message put out by ISIS.
What part of that is fake news...??
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!