Revolution is here: "the Left is absolutely terrified of free speech and will do literally anything to shut it down"

You're mentally ill.

in Milo we trust wrote:

The establishment is oh so predictable. When Assange became too dangerous to the narrative they were peddling, they attempted to smear him as a rapist. When Trump became a threat to win the presidency, they did likewise.

Lol. Are you kidding me? They don't think he's dangerous, they think he's a perverted f@ggot. Do you know nothing about the people in your party?

Fred Dingus wrote:

in Milo we trust wrote:

The establishment is oh so predictable. When Assange became too dangerous to the narrative they were peddling, they attempted to smear him as a rapist. When Trump became a threat to win the presidency, they did likewise.

Lol. Are you kidding me? They don't think he's dangerous, they think he's a perverted f@ggot. Do you know nothing about the people in your party?

Milo's dangerous because, like Assange, he speaks the truth and more and more people are listening to his message (standing up for Western values and free speech in our countries). I'm not a Republican (or an American, for that matter) so I really don't concern myself with what that party thinks.

Republicans elected Trump, who waved the rainbow flag during his speeches and said that Caitlyn Jenner was welcome to use whichever bathroom he/she wanted in any of his buildings. He spoke in favor of the LGBTQ community and received roaring approval from his audiences. Perhaps the average Republican isn't as bigoted as you seem to think.

Well well well...

All this talk about the left not supporting free speech. Berkeley provided an auditorium for Milo to speak. The school was willing to give him a chance to speak. Some arsholes anarchists violently protested and it had to be cancelled.

The conservative conference disinvited Milo. They are not willing to give him a chance to speak.

It proves Milo is an apologist to Catholic priests molestation of boys.

He tried to play up the benefits of Catholic priests molesting him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJhHwspZGcg

Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet but the violent/damaging protesters weren't even berkeley students, they were an anarchist cult from Oakland that frequently shows up at peaceful protests making them un-peaceful.

gays not defending gays wrote:

Wtfunny, why are you not defending your boyfriend Milo?

"Boyfriend"? Wtf is wrong with you?

Milo is a narcissistic a$$hole. I can see why the right love him.

What is amazing is that he has so little self awareness that he actually is blaming the incident on being a victim of sexual abuse. He built his outrage brand on going after the movement against rape and sexual assault on college campuses by attacking them for their "victim" culture.

But even worse is the fact that he dove head first into what is essentially the version of the blood libel for the LGBT community: pedophilia. The anti-LGBT forces always go straight for child sex abuse in any argument against protecting the rights of members of the LGBT community. Milo is such an entitled millenial that he does not even understand that this is the most powerful source of ant-LGBT sentiment and sees no risk in even joking about it. Milo came on the scene long after all the hard fought victories for LGBT rights and may have set back the LGBT community a decade with his stupidity.

egwf2q wrote:

Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet but the violent/damaging protesters weren't even berkeley students, they were an anarchist cult from Oakland that frequently shows up at peaceful protests making them un-peaceful.

Umm yeah. That's why the Berkeley student newspaper ran a whole week of op-eds by students defending the riots, the majority of them saying they themselves took part.

Precious Roy wrote:

But even worse is the fact that he dove head first into what is essentially the version of the blood libel for the LGBT community: pedophilia.

This is false, and the gist of it is exactly what Milo was saying. The "blood libel" against gays and lesbians has always been the predation/grooming of the vulnerable, usually in the teen to young adult years (whereas paedophilia, as Milo notes, is pre-pubescent). This has been true since Roman times, at the very least. The "lowering of the age of consent" (typically to 12 or 13) is one of the big issues for this NAMBLA crowd, so it's no surprise that Milo fits in well.

MILO RESIGNS!!

Not like he was "forced" out from Breitbart, eh?

He actually had a press conference to announce his resignation?!

What a narcissist.

Use your terms correctly wrote:

The "blood libel" against gays and lesbians has always been the predation/grooming of the vulnerable, usually in the teen to young adult years (whereas paedophilia, as Milo notes, is pre-pubescent). This has been true since Roman times, at the very least. The "lowering of the age of consent" (typically to 12 or 13) is one of the big issues for this NAMBLA crowd, so it's no surprise that Milo fits in well.

This fits in pretty well with my experience. College is a typical time for this, as I can remember my college orientation 20-odd years ago, with various "chicken hawk" characters (is this term still used?) eyeing around for anyone who seemed outside the norm, a proctor-planned trip to "certain places" on Melrose Ave, etc. Of course, unless you know the culture, you might think there was nothing untoward. There's also the almost-always ignored differential in the catch-all "gays" between those who penetrate and those who are penetrated (80-90% don't "swing", and many don't even use the word "gay" for the former).

I can't speak for lesbianism, but I sense that LUGs (lesbians until graduation, i.e. women who get so sick of boorish guys, but still want to live their "sexual potential" while at college) are a more native phenomenon, with there more usually being near equality of status between the participants. OTOH, whereas gay male profs are unlikely to seek out students, this seems (slightly) more common from lesbians. None of this is anywhere near as common as the rampant heterosexual hook-ups of course, but for that the expectations are usually close to mutual.

He actually had a press conference to announce his resignation?!

Transcript available (from prepared remarks):

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/02/21/full-remarks-milo-delivers-speech-press-conference-amid-video-scandal/

in Milo we trust wrote:

Milo's dangerous because, like Assange, he speaks the truth and more and more people are listening to his message (standing up for Western values and free speech in our countries). I'm not a Republican (or an American, for that matter) so I really don't concern myself with what that party thinks.

Republicans elected Trump, who waved the rainbow flag during his speeches and said that Caitlyn Jenner was welcome to use whichever bathroom he/she wanted in any of his buildings. He spoke in favor of the LGBTQ community and received roaring approval from his audiences. Perhaps the average Republican isn't as bigoted as you seem to think.

Milo's as dangerous as lego on the floor in barefeet. He's a hack with not one original thought (said that his fans have so little understanding of history they don't see this).

As for Trump, you're a fool. He held a rainbow flag (upside down) ONCE and that is supposed to make up for appointing that self-hating anti-gay Pence, his support for bathroom laws, saying he would appoint judges who would overturn marriage equality, his support for religious freedom laws which allow discrimination. This solidifies his approval with Republicans...they are exactly as bigots as we think and are even more stupid.

My book, Dangerous, has received interest from publishers after my previous publisher Simon and Schuster informed me they no longer wished to release it. The book will come out this year as planned. I will be donating 10 per cent of my royalties to child sex abuse charities.

Milo says the same thing. You get corrupted at an age where you don't realize it's abuse.

The same targeting can of course occur in other forms of abusive relationships, but the gay world has been this way since forever.

The First Amendment prohibits government from making laws that inhibit free speech. It does not prohibit other people from opposing/commenting/protesting against asshats like Milo. He wants it both ways, he gets to say whatever he wants and cries when people tell him to f-off like on Bill Maher last Friday.