Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

I am completely ok with giving religious communities the option of practicing their religion how they see fit.....even if it means spreading COVID to their at risk population and possibly even killing them. That is their constitutional right to take that risk. However, many congregations have chosen to conduct virtual sermons or virtual bible studies and have chosen to practice their religion in a safer way that does not expose their at risk population to COVID.

Both parties try to have it both ways at times. Many democrats want freedom of gender identity but don't won't religious freedom. Many republicans want religious freedom but don't want women to have the freedom to choose.

However, I think anyone who chooses to congregate with 100+ or more people should be required to get a temporary 14 day tattoo so I know who to stay away from :) :P

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

I am completely ok with giving religious communities the option of practicing their religion how they see fit.....even if it means spreading COVID to their at risk population and possibly even killing them. That is their constitutional right to take that risk. However, many congregations have chosen to conduct virtual sermons or virtual bible studies and have chosen to practice their religion in a safer way that does not expose their at risk population to COVID.

Both parties try to have it both ways at times. Many democrats want freedom of gender identity but don't won't religious freedom. Many republicans want religious freedom but don't want women to have the freedom to choose.

However, I think anyone who chooses to congregate with 100+ or more people should be required to get a temporary 14 day tattoo so I know who to stay away from :) :P

Alan

Sorry, but the bolded part is an example of a terrible method of argumentation. You're basically equating anything and everything with the word "freedom" in it. Complete and utter nonsense.

No. I'm ultimately saying both sides are hypocrites. Which is true.

Let religious folk practice however they want as per their constitutional freedom.

I also say let people who have gone through hormone replacement therapy identify by whatever sex they choose, however there needs to be medical guidelines to do so. This is similar to what the military was pushing at one point and made sense as it's a long drawn out process that includes a complete hormone replacement program.

I have no issue with Billy wanting to be Billy Jean or compete in sports as Billy Jean....but there needs to be guidelines as far as hormone replacement therapy and T:E ratios in order to compete as the opposite of your biological sex.

Alan

+1. That was just dumb.

Runningart2004 wrote:

I am completely ok with giving religious communities the option of practicing their religion how they see fit.....even if it means spreading COVID to their at risk population and possibly even killing them. That is their constitutional right to take that risk. However, many congregations have chosen to conduct virtual sermons or virtual bible studies and have chosen to practice their religion in a safer way that does not expose their at risk population to COVID.

Both parties try to have it both ways at times. Many democrats want freedom of gender identity but don't won't religious freedom. Many republicans want religious freedom but don't want women to have the freedom to choose.

However, I think anyone who chooses to congregate with 100+ or more people should be required to get a temporary 14 day tattoo so I know who to stay away from :) :P

Alan

I like the end bit. IMO the absolute limit to every right is when it starts to get other people killed. These folks decide to congregate because they don’t like zoom and not only do they get themselves killed but they spread the death to others. This is only happened because there is still doubt about the virus’ potency. Would people feel the same if it was Ebola instead? How high does the body count have to be to cross the tolerance threshold?

We Americans have a more extreme take and tolerance of our rights and liberties, from bearing arms to religion to privacy. We are often ok with infringing upon others’s rights or freedoms. I can include a whole bunch of examples but I’m just trying to point out that we are not culturally driven by a sense of care for our communities and environment, even if it means we would be individually better off in the long run.

Lol

https://twitter.com/betweenyesorno/status/1332220541260861442?s=21

DiaperDon is back baby

https://twitter.com/eric_psmith/status/1332224297419632641?s=21

I told you guys this fool wasn’t stopping

https://twitter.com/kloeffler/status/1332123287397265410?s=21

This one was also really good from 2019

https://twitter.com/desertplaya/status/1154539387998228480?s=21

yes yes yes yes wrote:

Flybang mash wrote:

Are you seriously denying that the lack of knowledge as to what the Trump Army may do in the future is ominous? That facts don't support your alleged claim.

Good one. You are starting to become genuinely amusing.

Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family.

It really is amusing. Some are in meltdown that Trump got destroyed, and are trying to make themselves feel better by trying to make others scared?

Ohhh, the trump army is soooo scary!. I hope none have bone spurs.

Gina wrote:

1101 wrote:

Sorry, but the bolded part is an example of a terrible method of argumentation. You're basically equating anything and everything with the word "freedom" in it. Complete and utter nonsense.

+1. That was just dumb.

I gotta go with 1101 on this. But I will say using numbers was a badly written law. 100 people is a small church is packed, but in a huge church is less of a concern.

How absolutely stupid can the trump cult be? Trump said the Cruz cheated when he beat Trump in a couple primaries. He said that the election was rigged when Hillary won the popular vote. And now that he lost the election Biden cheated, again?

What is wrong with you people for still believing him? It is so ridiculous the garbage you people believe!

Trollminator wrote:

I told you guys this fool wasn’t stopping

https://twitter.com/kloeffler/status/1332123287397265410?s=21

:

And I told you guy that this election isn't over.

Judge has halted PA certification

Judge in WI has petition on 150k counterfeit ballots

Judge in NV called hearing

Judge in GA granted review with case headed to circuit court

KAG2020

Trollminator wrote:

I told you guys this fool wasn’t stopping

https://twitter.com/kloeffler/status/1332123287397265410?s=21

I will admit to being surprised that he would go stump for anyone after his loss, especially since it's in a state he lost. I'm not sure what's in it for him...hopeful adoration from those he is speaking to? Somehow being able to monetize this? He doesn't give a damn about the Republican party or America, so that's not it. He COULD be delusional enough at this point to believe he has another shot at winning in 2024. Not sure what his game here is.

What he had better do though is keep his anger over losing in check. He has no filter and is VERY capable of saying something that could get him into serious legal hot water.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

I told you guys this fool wasn’t stopping

https://twitter.com/kloeffler/status/1332123287397265410?s=21

:

And I told you guy that this election isn't over.

Judge has halted PA certification

Judge in WI has petition on 150k counterfeit ballots

Judge in NV called hearing

Judge in GA granted review with case headed to circuit court

KAG2020

Go away fool. Seriously. We know you are outrageously stupid, but it is VERY possible you might be mentally ill. In all seriousness, go see a doctor. All of this because your Orange Menace can't admit that he lost. Pathetic.

But but but muh Norpoth

But but but Ghost said something about Hunter Biden’s lap top

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-host-tucker-carlson-062218949.html

ENJOY YOUR LOSS ??

We accept your unconditional surrender.

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55096851

ENJOY YOUR LOSS ?

I’m sorry, but I don’t see many Democrats trying to restrict people’s religious freedoms. Limiting occupancy in churches at the same time that occupancy is being limited in just about every other context during a public health crisis isn’t an imposition on their right or ability to practice their faith.

So you’re setting up a false dichotomy to argue against and then come back to white knight for trans people to show how un-hypocritical you are when your original argument was hypocritical to start with.

Yeah...that was the biggest error in Alan's part that was bolded by another user. Democrats for the most part are actually religious...Christian even. Black people are overwhelmingly Christian. Democrats who are not religious (like me) don't want to restrict religious freedom. We don't care to hear about the religious beliefs of others as often as we do, but we are all for religious freedom.