jesseriley wrote:
Roger Stone may also be sentenced to wear an “I’m with Stupid” shirt after his release from prison.
Telling that the likes of agent orange and Stone are what tzees have been referring to as "alphas"
jesseriley wrote:
Roger Stone may also be sentenced to wear an “I’m with Stupid” shirt after his release from prison.
Telling that the likes of agent orange and Stone are what tzees have been referring to as "alphas"
Fat hurts wrote:
agip wrote:
that's either the driest sarcasm I've ever heard... or the worst post of the day.
Dry sarcasm for sure. That's the funniest line I've read on here in a very long time. Well done.
Trump doesn't have any faults. If you don't believe me, ask him yourself.
Quid Pro Joe left NH to campaign in South Carolina.
It's over. He'll drop out soon.
single wing wrote:
agip wrote:
one of the most amazing things in American politics is that when you explain actual Republican policies to actual Republicans, they don't believe it. They literally do not believe that their party wants to take health care away and give rich people huge tax breaks.
The dems have failed miserably. Dem policies are popular but Dems get caught up in elitist woke politics so country joe and jane say to themselves 'these snobby city folk are going to force me to change how I look at life - I'm staying with the Rs.'
total political malpractice and we're doing it again with the wokest candidate on the list.
great job, dems.
Yes, Republican policies are not popular and democratic policies are.
For some reason you want Democrats to not actually pursue those popular policies and return to the James Carville model of triangulation.
what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.
I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.
agip wrote:
single wing wrote:
Yes, Republican policies are not popular and democratic policies are.
For some reason you want Democrats to not actually pursue those popular policies and return to the James Carville model of triangulation.
what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.
I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.
Your party wants socialism, that's how they have lost the moderate voters.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
...
^Nothing burger
Agip will now join trumpanzees in bashing bernie.
Meanwhile, bloodbath at DOJ as all Stone prosecutors resign over attempts to override sentencing recommendation.
semsurrrr wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
You said one thing that I agree with 100%. A vote for Trump is a F.U. Vote.
It's a vote of anger and hate.
No, it's literally, a "have sex with yourself" vote... because from what I've seen of many liberals... nobody else will
Not that many liberals vote for Trump. And I can't comment on the sex appeal of liberals voting trump.
agip wrote:
single wing wrote:
Yes, Republican policies are not popular and democratic policies are.
For some reason you want Democrats to not actually pursue those popular policies and return to the James Carville model of triangulation.
what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.
I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.
Many Dems are idealists. But they lose site of the real danger of 4 more years of Trump.
I know a number of smart successful Republicans who are embarrassed by Trump. They won't vote trump but will if Bernie or Elizabeth are running.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Quid Pro Joe left NH to campaign in South Carolina.
It's over. He'll drop out soon.
Good thing you’re not known for your accurate predictive ability.
Conundrum wrote:
agip wrote:
what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.
I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.
Many Dems are idealists. But they lose site of the real danger of 4 more years of Trump.
I know a number of smart successful Republicans who are embarrassed by Trump. They won't vote trump but will if Bernie or Elizabeth are running.
All wealthy Rs will vote for trump, he has really looked out for them. There are also many Rs who will vote for him because they are scared to death of the communist/socialist Dems, deep state, etc. The rest are just trumpanzees like trigged and Sally.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
agip wrote:
what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.
I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.
Your party wants socialism, that's how they have lost the moderate voters.
Bullish!t from you once again. Bernie Sanders and maybe Elizabeth Warren want a form of democratic socialism similar to what’s practiced with success in Scandinavia. There is a world of difference between that and just socialism.
Again that’s one or two Democratic candidates. People like Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg don’t even advocate democratic socialism.
jesseriley wrote:
Agip will now join trumpanzees in bashing bernie.
Meanwhile, bloodbath at DOJ as all Stone prosecutors resign over attempts to override sentencing recommendation.
Unreasonable, agip has a valid point. Pick winnable battles.
Sally Vix wrote:
The Burghh wrote:
I’m curious to know what all the Trump lovers have to say about this. Rigged, Sally, Trump....EXPLAIN
I am not a Trump lover. But most of Obama's jobs were part-time jobs or low-paying jobs.
Can you post a link proving that statement? All Obama’s jobs were part time and low paying and all Trumps jobs are full time and high paying. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE EVIDENCE!!!
There is one critical lesson Dems may perhaps be forced to learn, besides the effectiveness of chronic lying and protecting a leader at all costs. That lesson is blame everything on the prior administration and take credit for anything good that happens while you are in power, even if you didn’t directly cause it. Obama scores a fat F on this. He was modest to a fault while Bush handed him a disastrous economy and political climate. He should have reminded the country daily about how horrendous Bush and the reckless GOP was with the wars, deficit and economy. He should have directly faulted them for everything and boasted every single day about how awesome his miracle economic turnaround was, and how all Americans are as happy and prosperous as ever despite any evidence to the contrary.
Obama fkn sucked at this and let the right control the narrative, diminishing and concealing his accomplishments. Taking the high road is a bull$hit strategy with a country riddled with emotionally charged simpletons.
Dems will have a chance to fix their act after trump. They could blame trump for any bad thing for the next 50 years and they should.
Conundrum wrote:
agip wrote:
what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.
I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.
Many Dems are idealists. But they lose site of the real danger of 4 more years of Trump.
I know a number of smart successful Republicans who are embarrassed by Trump. They won't vote trump but will if Bernie or Elizabeth are running.
Agree, idealists to a fault, severely lacking in pragmatism.
Trump will be out of control if he gets a second term, with no concern regarding reelection and without anyone in the GOP prepared to hold him accountable.
Trump will very likely get to replace another liberal Supreme Court judge with a conservative one. Trump will of course continue filling the courts with conservatives. The impact will be felt for decades.
No liberal of any hue should be “or bust” about their favorite candidate. Sometimes in life you have to be practical and pick the lesser of two evils.
Dreamers and their families will appreciate it, much more than idealist sound-bytes are necessary from the left.
The Burghh wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I am not a Trump lover. But most of Obama's jobs were part-time jobs or low-paying jobs.
Can you post a link proving that statement? All Obama’s jobs were part time and low paying and all Trumps jobs are full time and high paying. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE EVIDENCE!!!
The Forbes article is about Trump and shows that many of the jobs created during his tenure have been part time and low paying.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Quid Pro Joe left NH to campaign in South Carolina.
It's over. He'll drop out soon.
No way two all white states should pick a nominee
Ciro wrote:
The Burghh wrote:
Can you post a link proving that statement? All Obama’s jobs were part time and low paying and all Trumps jobs are full time and high paying. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE EVIDENCE!!!
The Forbes article is about Trump and shows that many of the jobs created during his tenure have been part time and low paying.
So you are saying Sally is full of sh*t. Making up things when he can’t explain the truth.
The Burghh wrote:
Ciro wrote:
The Forbes article is about Trump and shows that many of the jobs created during his tenure have been part time and low paying.
So you are saying Sally is full of sh*t. Making up things when he can’t explain the truth.
I will iterate ... most of the jobs created during Obama's tenure were part-time, low-paying and often service-oriented.