100m times for ELITE MID to LONG DISTANCE

Completely agree.

Sub 11? Hell no. Sub 11.9? Yes, for the most elite of long distance. Now for mid - distance, there are probably a good amount who can snatch 10.99 or less.

Mid's are sub-11 for sure. Maybe some long aren't but they are probably right near there

This forum is rife with people who emphasize lots of easy miles as 'base' and de-emphasize speedwork. Sub 11 is nice, but not terribly impressive in the grand scheme of things; quite common for pro up to 1500, though not sure about 5k.

Ummm ever heard of Jordan Hasay?

Times from blocks are meaningless.

Running start is sufficient. These 100m times

are w/ running start, for top international elite.

Marathon

Idontreallyknow wrote:

Mid's are sub-11 for sure. Maybe some long aren't but they are probably right near there

Zero mid distance runners can break 11 and most long distance runners can't break 12. High mileage harms sprint speed more than it helps. The old book How They Train contains PBs at many distances for top distance athletes and their 100m times are mostly in the 12.x range or 100yd in the 11.x range.

HardLoper wrote:

Idontreallyknow wrote:

Mid's are sub-11 for sure. Maybe some long aren't but they are probably right near there

Zero mid distance runners can break 11 and most long distance runners can't break 12. High mileage harms sprint speed more than it helps. The old book How They Train contains PBs at many distances for top distance athletes and their 100m times are mostly in the 12.x range or 100yd in the 11.x range.

I see now why everyone on this forum talks about politics and the general news.

They have no fking clue about athletics.

HardLoper wrote:

Idontreallyknow wrote:

Mid's are sub-11 for sure. Maybe some long aren't but they are probably right near there

Zero mid distance runners can break 11 and most long distance runners can't break 12. High mileage harms sprint speed more than it helps. The old book How They Train contains PBs at many distances for top distance athletes and their 100m times are mostly in the 12.x range or 100yd in the 11.x range.

A book from like 50 years ago? Rudisha can't break 11? His 400 is in the lower 45s, Clayton Murphy broke 12 in high school, surely he's gotten much faster. Now maybe I was wrong cause I was more thinking the speed based 800 runners but surely some can break 11

I'm just going to post this everywhere morons like you post about distance runners sprinting.

https://youtu.be/KJMIwlQB-28

Now you see three things. First is how much fcking faster 11.5 is than 12.9. Secondly, how little power the skinny distance runner has. Thirdly, why sprinters are built like that boxer who has ZERO track experience but destroyed even the pro high jumper.

BullSlacker wrote:

I'm just going to post this everywhere morons like you post about distance runners sprinting.

https://youtu.be/KJMIwlQB-28

Now you see three things. First is how much fcking faster 11.5 is than 12.9. Secondly, how little power the skinny distance runner has. Thirdly, why sprinters are built like that boxer who has ZERO track experience but destroyed even the pro high jumper.

I'm talking about mid distance guys. Like 800m runners

Elite 800m, some will I'm sure just depends on their background. It's a mixed bag at the 800. But the 800 is hardly 'distance' like the OP says.

Don't mention the 1500m. Farah is 9th All Time. You just saw him be obliterated by an 11.5.

In front of him are Iguider (endurance) Morceli (endurance) Lagat (endurance) El G (endurance).

The guys that could even begin to not embarrass themselves over 100m will be 800m guys that also run the 15, like Coe.

Case closed move on. If you lot still have something to say just watch the 3:28 man run a 12.9 flailing his skinny limbs about another 10 times or so and then remember that 3:28 is 56.5 400m pace (not fast).

BullSlacker wrote:

But the 800 is hardly 'distance' like the OP says.

Read the title MID to Long

Mo Farah is mid to long.

I DON'T CARE

BullSlacker wrote:

I'm just going to post this everywhere morons like you post about distance runners sprinting.

https://youtu.be/KJMIwlQB-28

Now you see three things. First is how much fcking faster 11.5 is than 12.9. Secondly, how little power the skinny distance runner has. Thirdly, why sprinters are built like that boxer who has ZERO track experience but destroyed even the pro high jumper.

There's no way that was 100% Mo. He's closed 5k/10k races faster than 12.9 his final 400. He most likely didn't do his full warm up and didn't want to risk injury for this tv show.

12.9x4= 51.6

12.9 is JV high school girl time.

GGGGGG wrote:

BullSlacker wrote:

I'm just going to post this everywhere morons like you post about distance runners sprinting.

https://youtu.be/KJMIwlQB-28

Now you see three things. First is how much fcking faster 11.5 is than 12.9. Secondly, how little power the skinny distance runner has. Thirdly, why sprinters are built like that boxer who has ZERO track experience but destroyed even the pro high jumper.

There's no way that was 100% Mo. He's closed 5k/10k races faster than 12.9 his final 400. He most likely didn't do his full warm up and didn't want to risk injury for this tv show.

12.9x4= 51.6

12.9 is JV high school girl time.

Now I've seen it all. The idiot that blindly ignores what is put in front of him.

Watch the fking video. He grimaces and flails but has no speed or power. This is to be expected by everyone that knows about athletics.

It is much easier for a distance runner to put 4 rolling start 100ms together than get out of the blocks and sprint one. Bolts rolling 100m is like 8.7. Think about it.

MOVE ON.

BullSlacker wrote:

I'm just going to post this everywhere morons like you post about distance runners sprinting.

Mo was very clearly jogging in that video. Your failure to see that makes you the exact thing you accuse others of being in using the term "moron."

Oh yeah, before you talk about junior girls times, don't forget that Jonathan Brownlee, elite triathlete and 14 flat/28 mid runner was in the same race and managed 14.3.

When are you morons going to learn that distance runners can't sprint. I know you all think you have run 11.x and 50.x in training hand timed by your mate on his iPhone, but if we had a Letsrun special Olympics maybe 1 guy who posts here might break 14 and 54 - actually FAT from the blocks.

Distance runners are SLOW

BullSlacker wrote:

GGGGGG wrote:

There's no way that was 100% Mo. He's closed 5k/10k races faster than 12.9 his final 400. He most likely didn't do his full warm up and didn't want to risk injury for this tv show.

12.9x4= 51.6

12.9 is JV high school girl time.

Now I've seen it all. The idiot that blindly ignores what is put in front of him.

Watch the fking video. He grimaces and flails but has no speed or power. This is to be expected by everyone that knows about athletics.

It is much easier for a distance runner to put 4 rolling start 100ms together than get out of the blocks and sprint one. Bolts rolling 100m is like 8.7. Think about it.

MOVE ON.

You sound angry. I'd urge you to take a look at the prior thread about Mo's 100 race. Btw, I run sub-11. ;)