BREAKING: NCAA Moves Championship Events From North Carolina

random4 wrote:

off base wrote:

Do you think we should get rid of handicap parking since such a small number of people are handicapped and some might be faking it?

I'm not stalking you but,,,

I've paid to have parking lots installed at my businesses and you usually put in %5 of the spaces as handicapped. This is because that is the statistical amount of spaces needed for our population. I would be ok with putting in transgender bathrooms in proportion to their population but not to make EVERY single bathroom available to everyone ALL the time.

I won't say it unless you make me....like if you claim 1 in 4 women are raped every day on college campuses.

Your rape comment serves no purpose here. Saying bathrooms are open to transgender people does not cost any money. Why would you be against this? There is no harm and it can improve the lives of some. Again, you are just being difficult for no good reason.

off base wrote:

random4 wrote:

I'm not stalking you but,,,

I've paid to have parking lots installed at my businesses and you usually put in %5 of the spaces as handicapped. This is because that is the statistical amount of spaces needed for our population. I would be ok with putting in transgender bathrooms in proportion to their population but not to make EVERY single bathroom available to everyone ALL the time.

I won't say it unless you make me....like if you claim 1 in 4 women are raped every day on college campuses.

Your rape comment serves no purpose here. Saying bathrooms are open to transgender people does not cost any money. Why would you be against this? There is no harm and it can improve the lives of some. Again, you are just being difficult for no good reason.

How would you quantify "no harm"? Would it be "no harm" to not offer separate showers for the football team and the female cheerleaders?

thejeff wrote:

How would you quantify "no harm"? Would it be "no harm" to not offer separate showers for the football team and the female cheerleaders?

I'm really interested in seeing his response. I really am worried that he does not see the similarity in these two issues.

off base wrote:

Your rape comment serves no purpose here. Saying bathrooms are open to transgender people does not cost any money. Why would you be against this? There is no harm and it can improve the lives of some. Again, you are just being difficult for no good reason.

What "gain" is there? How are transgendered people currently being harmed by using the current bathroom situation?

thejeff wrote:

How would you quantify "no harm"? Would it be "no harm" to not offer separate showers for the football team and the female cheerleaders?

First, there are not separate showers for football players and cheerleaders as there are some male cheerleaders and some female football players. So I'll assume you mean having the men and women share showers.

That would mean taking away either the men's showers or the women's. With having open bathrooms nothing is being taken away. Also with bathrooms there are individual stalls. I've never seen anyone walking around naked in a bathroom.

off base wrote:

Duhhhhh wrote:

The whole point is that it's outrageous to change everything for the 99.99% in order to accomodate something the 0.001% are essentially making up.

It's not made up and that is something the movement is trying to make people understand.

Do you think we should get rid of handicap parking since such a small number of people are handicapped and some might be faking it?

No because being handicapped is a real thing for plenty of people. Being a male who just decided in your own mind that you identify as female is not a real thing. Was that a serious attempt at a comparison? Christ.

Duhhhh wrote:

No because being handicapped is a real thing for plenty of people. Being a male who just decided in your own mind that you identify as female is not a real thing. Was that a serious attempt at a comparison? Christ.

Most of the country, including the NCAA, knows this is a real, just like being gay is not a lifestyle choice. I'm sorry you are filled with hate and don't understand.

Hmm, yeah its called the Belk Bowl. A fun 5K as part of the event too

If NC allows trannies equal rights then does than mean America has to give Muslims equal rights in the USA and in areas occupied by US militants in the MIddle East such as Palestine?

The 'transgender bathroom law' has nothing to do with bigotry toward transgendered people. How is this so hard to understand? What the law does, is provide legal cover for a pedophile/sex creep to enter, repeatedly, women's restroom/locker rooms, with complete immunity.

A criminal will simply wait until a moment that is deemed 'clear', and an assault will take place. This is the biggest point attempting to be made against these types of law. As was posted earlier (that has never been answered), why the urgency to accommodate a population that represents under 1% of society, and, why has this become such a big deal, recently? What was the spark?

Is it OK if I call rojo a retarded autistic schizophrenic with a brain that is the size of an uncooked grain of basmati rice?

In conclusion:

1) Yes.

(I do not care if it is OK.)

OK?

OK.

Have a nice day.

bigger picture wrote:

The 'transgender bathroom law' has nothing to do with bigotry toward transgendered people. How is this so hard to understand? What the law does, is provide legal cover for a pedophile/sex creep to enter, repeatedly, women's restroom/locker rooms, with complete immunity.

A criminal will simply wait until a moment that is deemed 'clear', and an assault will take place. This is the biggest point attempting to be made against these types of law. As was posted earlier (that has never been answered), why the urgency to accommodate a population that represents under 1% of society, and, why has this become such a big deal, recently? What was the spark?

So we shouldn't protect groups of less than 1% of the population, for example, Arabs, Japanese, US veterans of ground combat action, etc.?

You're not providing an answer to the post... You're diverting. Answer the post, and I will reply yours.

Screw the PC liberal loonies. It's time for people to fight back. Shouldn't be viewed as hateful to not want my daughters at the mercy of perverts.

Screw the NCAA. Screw Bruce Springsteen. Screw you pervert-enablers.

Less than 1% wrote:

bigger picture wrote:

The 'transgender bathroom law' has nothing to do with bigotry toward transgendered people. How is this so hard to understand? What the law does, is provide legal cover for a pedophile/sex creep to enter, repeatedly, women's restroom/locker rooms, with complete immunity.

A criminal will simply wait until a moment that is deemed 'clear', and an assault will take place. This is the biggest point attempting to be made against these types of law. As was posted earlier (that has never been answered), why the urgency to accommodate a population that represents under 1% of society, and, why has this become such a big deal, recently? What was the spark?

So we shouldn't protect groups of less than 1% of the population, for example, Arabs, Japanese, US veterans of ground combat action, etc.?

That's right you ding bat. Put those three groups you refer to in concentration camps.

Less than 1%, no answer??? It's pretty difficult when you realize that you're actually supporting pedophiles and sex criminals, to a greater extent, eh?

Crooked Hillary wrote:

Screw the PC liberal loonies. It's time for people to fight back. Shouldn't be viewed as hateful to not want my daughters at the mercy of perverts.

Screw the NCAA. Screw Bruce Springsteen. Screw you pervert-enablers.

I'm sure no one will watch football tomorrow or basketball in March.

bigger picture wrote:

What the law does, is provide legal cover for a pedophile/sex creep to enter, repeatedly, women's restroom/locker rooms, with complete immunity.

No, it doesn't.

bigger picture wrote:

A criminal will simply wait until a moment that is deemed 'clear', and [insert crime] will take place.

Wait... Isn't that what criminals have always done?

Hard hitting rebuttal!!! You sure are, the mac! Yeah.

So, by your 'logic', since criminals "have always done" this, you're okay with granting legal protection for them to simply be in the restroom/locker room?

You're the type of rationalizer that says, "but assault/rape is illegal, already"... and you completely miss the forest for the trees.

Keep on hittin'... heavy stuff!