I'd take warriors in five before I took OKC to win the series still.
I'd take warriors in five before I took OKC to win the series still.
Yeah, that wrote:
rememberer wrote:Remember when the 00-01 Lakers swept through the playoffs undefeated until they lost game 1 of the Finals against the 76ers?
Yeah, that.
Ahem, this was the Warriors 3rd loss.
Both were unexpected game 1 playoff losses at home. In the long run, the Lakers game 1 finals loss was rather significant, even though it blemished their run towards playoff perfection.
Try to keep up.
Boost wrote:
0%. LMAO. Thanks for the laugh.
I will bump this after the Thunder lose the next game, just you wait.
Again, I like the Thunder to win this series. They just won't win the next game. I GUARANTEE IT, I KNOW MORE ABOUT BASKETBALL THAN YOU
coach deez nuts wrote:
Boost wrote:0%. LMAO. Thanks for the laugh.
I GUARANTEE IT, I KNOW MORE ABOUT BASKETBALL THAN YOU
LMAO! Fraid, not, idiot, not even close. Saying something as stupid as they have a 0% chance after they completely dominated the second half of that game makes you about as smart as a turd I left in my toilet this morning.
rememberer wrote:
Yeah, that wrote:Ahem, this was the Warriors 3rd loss.
Both were unexpected game 1 playoff losses at home. In the long run, the Lakers game 1 finals loss was rather significant, even though it blemished their run towards playoff perfection.
Try to keep up.
Ahem, the Lakers went 16-1 in those playoffs. How does a three loss, so far, GW team match that?
Yeah, that wrote:
rememberer wrote:Both were unexpected game 1 playoff losses at home. In the long run, the Lakers game 1 finals loss was rather insignificant, even though it blemished their run towards playoff perfection.
Try to keep up.
Ahem, the Lakers went 16-1 in those playoffs. How does a three loss, so far, GW team match that?
Who said anything about matching that? It was a simple analogy.
Both were unexpected game 1 playoff losses at home.
Why do I bother repeating myself in these forums when people respond without even reading................
rememberer wrote:
Yeah, that wrote:Ahem, the Lakers went 16-1 in those playoffs. How does a three loss, so far, GW team match that?
Who said anything about matching that? It was a simple analogy.
Both were unexpected game 1 playoff losses at home.
Why do I bother repeating myself in these forums when people respond without even reading................
Urine idiot. You are trying to compare a multi-playoff game loser, GW, to the Lakers who only lost a SINGLE GAME!. Lakers playoffs 16-1 >>>>> GW 3 losses, so far.
A better team to compare the 2016 Warriors to is the 2001 Seattle Mariners.
Screw the Warriors & their splish splash brothers & their bandwagon trendy fans & arrogant annoying players with no respect for the game. Screw them all the way Tijuana.
OKC fans are the worst I've seen of any location. Westbrook returns from injury, plays HARD, has moxie & competitive spirit. He leaves it on the floor every game. But "fans" criticize him. WB is unbelievable.
Boost wrote:
coach deez nuts wrote:I GUARANTEE IT, I KNOW MORE ABOUT BASKETBALL THAN YOU
LMAO! Fraid, not, idiot, not even close. Saying something as stupid as they have a 0% chance after they completely dominated the second half of that game makes you about as smart as a turd I left in my toilet this morning.
27 point loss, I knew what the f*ck I was talking about when I said 0% chance for the Thunder in this game BRO. Anyone who didn't think the Warriors were going to win (and win big) was an imbecile who hasn't payed attention to both teams this year. I do like the Thunder to win the series, I will say that again. Thinking it will be in 6.
Now run along and leave the real basketball talk to those who actually know the game.
coach deez nuts wrote:
Now run along and leave the real basketball talk to those who actually know the game.
You don't seem to realize, despite GW's win tonight, that OKC has home court advantage.
Home Court wrote:
coach deez nuts wrote:Now run along and leave the real basketball talk to those who actually know the game.
You don't seem to realize, despite GW's win tonight, that OKC has home court advantage.
Ummmmm, can you read? I have said all along in this thread I think the Thunder will win this series in 6. Everything about game 2 just screamed a Warriors win and I was 100% right. Does not mean I don't think the Thunder are amazing and I really do like them to end up in the Finals.
Boost wrote:
coach deez nuts wrote:There is no way in hell the Thunder sweep. There is 0% chance the Thunder win game 2.
That said, Thunder win the series in 6.
0%. LMAO. Thanks for the laugh. The only way the Warriors can beat this team is if the Thunder self destruct with TOs, bricked FTs and horrible shooting from Westbrook, like in the first half. That happened and they got several hail mary 3s from Curry and still lost.
A road game doesn't mean squat to the Thunder, this is their 4th WCF in the last 6 seasons.
You don't seem so smart right about now, do you?
Boost wrote:
coach deez nuts wrote:I GUARANTEE IT, I KNOW MORE ABOUT BASKETBALL THAN YOU
LMAO! Fraid, not, idiot, not even close. Saying something as stupid as they have a 0% chance after they completely dominated the second half of that game makes you about as smart as a turd I left in my toilet this morning.
You REALLY don't seem so smart now. Do you?
coach deez nuts wrote:
Home Court wrote:You don't seem to realize, despite GW's win tonight, that OKC has home court advantage.
Ummmmm, can you read? I have said all along in this thread I think the Thunder will win this series in 6. Everything about game 2 just screamed a Warriors win and I was 100% right. Does not mean I don't think the Thunder are amazing and I really do like them to end up in the Finals.
Why would anyone read your nonsense?
coach deez nuts wrote:
Home Court wrote:You don't seem to realize, despite GW's win tonight, that OKC has home court advantage.
Ummmmm, can you read? I have said all along in this thread I think the Thunder will win this series in 6. Everything about game 2 just screamed a Warriors win and I was 100% right. Does not mean I don't think the Thunder are amazing and I really do like them to end up in the Finals.
You obviously know a good bit more than that 'boost' moron. Still, I'm gonna have to say that the Warriors are still the favorites in spite of losing home court advantage. They will most likely split in OKC, evening the series at 2-2. They will win game 5 at home and most likely close it out in OKC. Though perhaps they will need a game 7 to finish it off.
Gentlemen Gym wrote:
coach deez nuts wrote:Ummmmm, can you read? I have said all along in this thread I think the Thunder will win this series in 6. Everything about game 2 just screamed a Warriors win and I was 100% right. Does not mean I don't think the Thunder are amazing and I really do like them to end up in the Finals.
You obviously know a good bit more than that 'boost' moron. Still, I'm gonna have to say that the Warriors are still the favorites in spite of losing home court advantage. They will most likely split in OKC, evening the series at 2-2. They will win game 5 at home and most likely close it out in OKC. Though perhaps they will need a game 7 to finish it off.
I disagree with you. GW is not invincible on the road. OKC takes the next two. GW gets a win at home. OKC wins game 6 at home; GW runs out of energy.
Home Court wrote:
coach deez nuts wrote:Ummmmm, can you read? I have said all along in this thread I think the Thunder will win this series in 6. Everything about game 2 just screamed a Warriors win and I was 100% right. Does not mean I don't think the Thunder are amazing and I really do like them to end up in the Finals.
Why would anyone read your nonsense?
Because I know what I'm talking about, we are thinking the same thing in terms of final series outcome anyways moron. You seem like a douchebag OKC fan which pisses me off, I hate people like you but I do think your team is going to win this series.
San Fran blew out the Oakies