S. Canaday wrote:
I lived/trained with Zach at Cornell, Hansons, and in Boulder. Dude is a sharp guy with a masters in chemical engineering from Cornell. I think he got mid 1500s on his SAT (when it was out of 1600).
I'm pretty sure he's worked to earn his way on his own and is for sure not a spoiled trust funder (like many in Boulder for example).
How far do we fall in accepting a mediocre performance as excellence?
The drop off in talent at Boston speaks for itself, but to elevate Zach or to congratulate a mediocre coach is beyond reproach.
When are we honest enough tell the truth to stop the backside kissing.
None of this has to do with SAT scores or degrees or personal wealth just running fast.