Bad Wigins wrote:
Jon Orange wrote:There is no phase of the 100 meter race that requires any type of drug. The real drug problem is idiots like you propagating the stupid drug obsession.
Got evidence, or just shit to talk?
A 3/10 of a second drop in barely 10 years, followed by miniscule improvements in the decades since amphetamines were banned - a ban which happened to work because they are only effective in competition and are nearly impossible to mask - is powerful circumstantial evidence at the least.
Sprinters constantly being caught using "cold medicine" as a substitute only illustrates how effective the real deal was.
But by all means talk more shit if that's all you got, even more people will realize how bankrupt your position is.
Has any human run faster than 12 meters per second on the flat without a strong following wind?
No.
Do sprinters need methamphetamine to run that fast?
No.
Do sprinters need methamphetamine to react quickly?
No.
Do sprinters need methamphetamine to hold speed endurance?
No.
Do sprinters need methamphetamine to be confident in their ability?
No.
Have I got any evidence that you are somewhat obsessed with Methamphetamine?
Yes.
Next stupid question?