Sucks to be you. But, really, all you really need to do is grow a pair. Chicks dig guys with self confidence, which apparently you have very little of....bet you can find an ugly betty type who feels the same way about American men that you do about American women. You can pair up and spend all your time angry and critical of social norms and demand immediate change. In other words, you can become liberals.
I lift. I play in a band.
I lift. I play in a band.
I lift. I play in a band.
I lift. I play in a band.
I lift. I play in a band.
I lift. I play in a band.
I lift. I play in a band.
Jess,
Interesting thoughts but doesn't that mean that women would be better bosses as they would have learned how to say no?
Wouldn't the two even out? Guys would get more promotions but girls would be better at keeping them?
Frustrated Workforce Person wrote:
Let me help you:
http://www.sexualcontrol.com/masturbation-addiction.html
Thanks for the link.
dial it up wrote:
You need to go after less attractive women.
Yes. Lower your standards.
You need to build your confidence and that stink on you.
Then you can move up.
Please don't become a serial killer. Not an expert, but....
jess from crabtown wrote:
I think gender roles in dating and sex from a young age actually play a role.
Society expects boys to ask girls on dates, not the other way around. Boys have to go out on a limb and risk rejection from a young age. Girls are taught to be passive and wait for a guy to ask them out. Then they have a choice - yes or no.
.
You really think society taught men to make the first step in mating? What would be the reason behind that, honest question? Why do you think in primates, and in most animal species the male is the aggressor (in terms of mating/ reproduction) and the female the passive one? And so you think only in humans this has been at some point "taught" to us by society? If so, when did that start? Middle ages, stone age? Or earlier?
Also, a personal question: when was the last time you tried to seduce a guy, actively in terms of approaching him, asking him out etc.? And how did he respond? Or did you not do that because "society taught you so?" How did you feel when a guy you were dreaming about finally approached you and asked you out or whatever? Did that feel unnatural or natural?
You are getting a lucrative degree. You are fit. You are musical. You have social skills. When you finish school you are going to make more money than 98% of the world's population regardless of what you do. You will have a nice car and meet interesting people. You will travel and see interesting things.
Sorry. I'm just not sympathetic.
Temper your raging inferiority complex and stop blaming 'feminism'. You are not entitled to anything.
Look around, get some perspective. Then, stop speaking in generalizations.
Yeah. And why does some old lady whose main accomplishment was being married to a President considered a role model for little girls? And why does she think that qualifies her to be president?
jess from crabtown wrote:
And I blame disney movies for this situation. It boggles my mind that we are still subjecting our daughters to the whole princess fantasy. Why is a rich woman in a pretty dress who, by fate alone, ends up with a handsome rich prince, considered a good role model for little girls?
krispy kremlin wrote:
I know I harp on this a lot but the personal-responsibility effacing nature of neo-liberalism contributes to this kind of society.
+1, my friend.
LastRealHedgie wrote:
Yeah. And why does some old lady whose main accomplishment was being married to a President considered a role model for little girls? And why does she think that qualifies her to be president?
jess from crabtown wrote:And I blame disney movies for this situation. It boggles my mind that we are still subjecting our daughters to the whole princess fantasy. Why is a rich woman in a pretty dress who, by fate alone, ends up with a handsome rich prince, considered a good role model for little girls?
Are you talking about Senator Clinton, the lady who served two terms as a Senator and was later Secretary of State? If you need someone to explain why she thinks she could be president, I don't think you should be offering your thoughts to the world. No, I'm not a fan and probably wouldn't vote for her, but lamebrained misogyny like yours is even worse.
Harry Pi wrote:
krispy kremlin wrote:I know I harp on this a lot but the personal-responsibility effacing nature of neo-liberalism contributes to this kind of society.
+1, my friend.
Right, it is the fault of liberals that the OP has put the blame on the entire US female population instead of looking at himself.
genuine random a hole wrote:
krispy kremlin wrote:A lot of factors at play here but you write a good summation.
I blame everyone: the parents, society, the media and the princesses themselves. But how is a father suppose to tell his daughter that she isn't all that great and she should settle for less-than-ideal? - yikes, that sounds like a one way ticket to the gutter.
One can only hope that it doesn't take until their early 30s to realize what really matters - if so, that's an issue of maturity. After years of rejection from the Pitts and Efrons and/or a disastrous relationship or two, they'll come around to reality - but then who wants to pick up the heavy-baggage, heavy-waistline, drama-laden aging-princess after she's been Cruise's sex-toy for two years?
We all have a lot of responsibilities, men, women, boys and girls, whether we like it or not. And we don't have unlimited shots at this game and after enough mistakes, its game over, again, whether we realize/accept it or not.
I know I harp on this a lot but the personal-responsibility effacing nature of neo-liberalism contributes to this kind of society.
Apparently you are not aware of the situations in Yemen, new potetial for Greek default, etc. Why would you discuss something so trivial at such a time?
The trajectory of the next generation of americans who will contributed to the strongest country in the world for the next century is worthy of consideration. Other trajectories of concern include male child-selection in China's One Child society, India's arranged marriage structure in a global context, and the children of slain Middle Eastern parents following over a decade of Western warfare (despite historical perpetual disarray in the region).
We aren't talking about air in a ball here. Update: still being reported on business outlets, morning radio/television, 3-threads on LRC first two discussion pages. Air in a ball.
You really think society taught men to make the first step in mating? What would be the reason behind that, honest question? Why do you think in primates, and in most animal species the male is the aggressor (in terms of mating/ reproduction) and the female the passive one? And so you think only in humans this has been at some point "taught" to us by society? If so, when did that start? Middle ages, stone age? Or earlier?
Also, a personal question: when was the last time you tried to seduce a guy, actively in terms of approaching him, asking him out etc.? And how did he respond? Or did you not do that because "society taught you so?" How did you feel when a guy you were dreaming about finally approached you and asked you out or whatever? Did that feel unnatural or natural?
Oh great argument - other animals do it so we should too. Male chimpanzees, our closest relatives, beat and rape the females. They also kill babies of other males. Some mammals eat their young. Perhaps we should adopt these practices too?
And men pursuing women is NOT something that's been going on for millenia in many societies. Throughout much of the world arranged marriage is and was the norm. That feels "unnatural" to Americans because it's not what we're used to. Moreover, if you are going to use historical precedent to argue what is natural and unnatural let's just get all women out of the workplace and back in the kitchen then.
Frustrated College Student wrote:
I play in a band.
OP, I found your problem. This isn't middle school, dude.
That and you also sound whiny and high maintenance. Sack up.
OP you are absolutely full of it, you sound like that kid in CA who shot up people last year... Blaming women! Like it is their fault they don't like you. News Flash you actually don't have game... Your probably really awkward.
You need to seek help before you hurt people or rape women you psycho.
How tall are you? Are you short?
Guess what? Most girls just don't dog short dudes!
I'm a tall, skinny runner and have never had a problem with women. Maybe it's because I don't feel they owe me! I ask women out because I like them, not because I want to "get some"
You are the one who has be brainwashed by Hollywood... I bet you actually believe you can "pick up" chicks at bars just to sleep with them once...
That does NOT happen. Only with skanks!
I think that happens maybe once to every normal guy.
You view women as objects, not as people...
This rinks of all that psycho talk these looser lone wolf mass shooters speak of after they killed a bunch of people, always being rejected by women, blaming them for not liking you! F*** that you piece of $h!t looser!
Disturbing crap!
Get help you turd
Frustrated College Student wrote:
People say that I struggle with women because I have "no game." "No game" my ass. I'm going to a good school, on track with lucrative degree that I'm passionate about. I work. I lift. I play in a band. I groom myself well. I'm a nice guy but not a pushover. I'm sociable. And guess what? I'm 20 and I haven't kissed a girl. Women have been conditioned from birth by the media with bullshit TV shows and pop idols to think that they're all special princesses who deserve a Brad Pitt or a Zac Efron... and they won't settle for anything less. Certainly not someone below 5,10 like me. Oh no no. Throughout high school and college, they ride the carousel of jocks and hot trailer trash, and when they're 30, they decide to settle down with some rich guy who cheats on them. And now, with feminism—because ignoring the bottom 90% of men wasn't enough— they now have an arsenal of shaming tactics to beat down on men with and add salt to our wounds. It is almost as if men are supposed to be ashamed of themselves for even wanting to meet someone in the first place. I applaud the men who find Russian brides for seeing through AMERICAN WOMENS' nonsense and getting out while they can. The more men glorify women and get down on their knees for them, the more this situation will be exacerbated.
You demonstrate ZERO value at all. No self respecting woman would ever want to date a loser which is what you are.
Frustrated College Student wrote:
People say that I struggle with women because I have "no game." "No game" my ass. I'm going to a good school, on track with lucrative degree that I'm passionate about. I work. I lift. I play in a band. I groom myself well. I'm a nice guy but not a pushover. I'm sociable. And guess what? I'm 20 and I haven't kissed a girl. Women have been conditioned from birth by the media with bullshit TV shows and pop idols to think that they're all special princesses who deserve a Brad Pitt or a Zac Efron... and they won't settle for anything less. Certainly not someone below 5,10 like me. Oh no no. Throughout high school and college, they ride the carousel of jocks and hot trailer trash, and when they're 30, they decide to settle down with some rich guy who cheats on them. And now, with feminism—because ignoring the bottom 90% of men wasn't enough— they now have an arsenal of shaming tactics to beat down on men with and add salt to our wounds. It is almost as if men are supposed to be ashamed of themselves for even wanting to meet someone in the first place. I applaud the men who find Russian brides for seeing through AMERICAN WOMENS' nonsense and getting out while they can. The more men glorify women and get down on their knees for them, the more this situation will be exacerbated.
What is "lucrative." 50k, 100k, 400k, 900k?
This won't help you know but just remember, "Men age like wine, women age like milk."
Most of those women would end up looking hideous by age 35, by mid40s- even the best just "look good for their age".
Get a good job, you'll land a decent women. Especially if you find one really into kids. All she wants is a sperm donor and someone to pay for her house, clothes, etc.. That man is YOU!
OP, be yourself. There is now a law on the books Rape by Deception, which you can be charged with if you pretend to be someone else.
The premise being she would never have gone to bed with the real you if she had known the truth.
I am not making this up - it was on Dateline NBC this past weekend.