Here are the cartoons that got 12 innocent people at Charlie Hebdo slaughtered

Bjbbmxgtss wrote:

le veritable wrote:

That is completely irrelevant to the point I was making. I take it, then, that you are tacitly accepting that my point was correct? That "political correctness" applies just as much to flag burning as it does to anti-islamism?

No. I wrote go ahead and burn the flag and reference those who saved your country from nazis as pedophiles.

Have at it dumb dumb. Now if you go on a murder spree against Americans expect that an American service member will put a bullet in your dome;)

Clear enough?

Is your reading comprehension so poor that you really don't understand my point?

I made a point about the fact that free speech includes the right to attack things that the right wing holds dear. I did not at any point actually threaten to burn a flag, nor did I actually say that I believed that American soldiers are criminals

Your hysterical reaction has apparently been to threaten to kill me for doing something I did not even allude to, so you clearly seem to have some issues with free speech yourself. I dare say you are something of a hypocrite.

By the way, here is a thread from last month which discussed making flag burning illegal, so yes, the right wing does engage in its own form of political correctness.

Kgdfvlr wrote:

Frightened Inmate # 5 wrote:

Brand Nubian, you come across as a psychopath. I'm glad I'm not sharing the same continent with you right now.

If you are prepared to use your cherished guns to protect some cartoon magazine's right to install a p1ss Chr1st outside the state house in Alabama, then I will listen to your hysterical ranting, otherwise STFU with your holier than thou free speech bs.

Of course from the security of your computer you have no problems talking $hit. If confronted face to face I assure you the outcome would NOT favor your weak a$$.

Q E D

I'm glad you can assume that I am some right wing dude who objects to idiots burning flags...you must be clairvoyant?

You don't have a point. You have a bruised mangina.

Jkutd wrote:

I'm glad you can assume that I am some right wing dude who objects to idiots burning flags...you must be clairvoyant?

You don't have a point. You have a bruised mangina.

Terrific, Ad Hominem now.

Now please clarify, do you think that the desire to outlaw flag burning, or slander against veterans and the military counts as political correctness? Do you agree that attempts to outlaw this is against free speech.

le veritable wrote:

Jkutd wrote:

I'm glad you can assume that I am some right wing dude who objects to idiots burning flags...you must be clairvoyant?

You don't have a point. You have a bruised mangina.

Terrific, Ad Hominem now.

Now please clarify, do you think that the desire to outlaw flag burning, or slander against veterans and the military counts as political correctness? Do you agree that attempts to outlaw this is against free speech.

It isn't outlawed. Idiots are free to be idiots; until the day they cross over to idiots murdering cartoon publishers.

Those idiots get a bullet to the dome. Actually lots of bullets...

Again you don't have a point.

Hktddc wrote:

le veritable wrote:

Terrific, Ad Hominem now.

Now please clarify, do you think that the desire to outlaw flag burning, or slander against veterans and the military counts as political correctness? Do you agree that attempts to outlaw this is against free speech.

It isn't outlawed. Idiots are free to be idiots; until the day they cross over to idiots murdering cartoon publishers.

Those idiots get a bullet to the dome. Actually lots of bullets...

Again you don't have a point.

Interesting, English isn't even my first language, and yet I appear to speak it better than you too.

Let me rephrase: Regardless of you own opinions does getting offended at the above two examples count as political correctness?

As the thread I linked to shows, there clearly is a segment of people who find this offensive to the point of no longer allowing it. There is also a major social taboo against either of those things, far more than there is against criticising Islam.

What else, other than political correctness, is this then?

le veritable wrote:

Hktddc wrote:

It isn't outlawed. Idiots are free to be idiots; until the day they cross over to idiots murdering cartoon publishers.

Those idiots get a bullet to the dome. Actually lots of bullets...

Again you don't have a point.

Interesting, English isn't even my first language, and yet I appear to speak it better than you too.

Let me rephrase: Regardless of you own opinions does getting offended at the above two examples count as political correctness?

As the thread I linked to shows, there clearly is a segment of people who find this offensive to the point of no longer allowing it. There is also a major social taboo against either of those things, far more than there is against criticising Islam.

What else, other than political correctness, is this then?

It is called "stupidity" frenchie.

You can't outlaw stupity, only liberals believe that stupidity can be outlawed.

Unfortunately, stupidity is and will always exist until the day of mans extinction. I know that comes as a shocker too many but it is a reality none the less....

Your English is not as "good" as you believe it to be..but certainly better than my French.

It's stupid to get offended by it? Or it's stupid to do it?

Are you deliberately misunderstanding the question?

There clearly is a desire to stop people from doing these things, does this desire count as political correctness?

I notice this thread soon got off the subject.

Coming back to it somewhat, I have just received a relevant e-mail featuring a very courageous French woman.

I doubt I’d have her kind of bravery under fire as it were.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY

Binks wrote:

I notice this thread soon got off the subject.

Coming back to it somewhat, I have just received a relevant e-mail featuring a very courageous French woman.

I doubt I’d have her kind of bravery under fire as it were.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY

You don't have any woman's bravery.

Perhaps the French should have all their women do the fighting. Anything is better than having the French "males" do it.

Binks wrote:

I notice this thread soon got off the subject.

Coming back to it somewhat, I have just received a relevant e-mail featuring a very courageous French woman.

I doubt I’d have her kind of bravery under fire as it were.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY

An article from the 700 Club. LOL.

How about this video of the family of the brave Muslim policeman who dies protecting free speech?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2015/jan/10/charlie-hebdo-victims-family-france-paris-ahmed-merabet-video

I'm not going to deny that there some unpleasant things going on in the banlieues, but I do think that we need to ask the question why radical Islam currently has an appeal that it did not have 20 or 30 years ago.

le veritable wrote:

It's stupid to get offended by it? Or it's stupid to do it?

Are you deliberately misunderstanding the question?

There clearly is a desire to stop people from doing these things, does this desire count as political correctness?

It is all stupidity. But even more stupid are those whom contemplate the stupidity of others to the level you do.

Stop wasting your life focused on the stupidity of others....

Ah, the courage of one hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.

Haven’t you any school homework to finish or are you having a rest from those playstaion games that are making you feel all brave and manly.

le veritable wrote:

How about this video of the family of the brave Muslim policeman who dies protecting free speech?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2015/jan/10/charlie-hebdo-victims-family-france-paris-ahmed-merabet-video

I'm not going to deny that there some unpleasant things going on in the banlieues, but I do think that we need to ask the question why radical Islam currently has an appeal that it did not have 20 or 30 years ago.

Corrupt leaders, mentally weak people, mass communication, and funding by places such as Saudi Arabia.

Man has and will always be crawling around this rock killing each other. Our history hasn't eluded to another scenario.

It pays to have a well funded and trained military.

It is no coincidence that the USA has the best military on the planet. State of the Art to more precise.

Binks wrote:

Ah, the courage of one hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.

Haven’t you any school homework to finish or are you having a rest from those playstaion games that are making you feel all brave and manly.

You aren't even good a personal insults.

America pity's you.

“It is no coincidence the USA has the best military on the planet.”

What!

The last successful campaigns the Americans fought was D-Day and Okinawa.

Every conflict since then the Americans have managed to make a complete pig’s ear of.

Korea - a classic case of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Vietnam - too painful to re-examine.

Afghanistan - 13 years (and $5 trillion) down the drain.

Iraq - easy victory over Saddam, leaving the Islamic fundamentalists in control.

Libya - again, the since Qaddafi was overthrown - the Muslim madmen have run riot.

Serbia - unbelievably, once again, the US handed another state, Kosovo, over to the Islamic extremists.

And it was only Russian pressure that stopped the Americans attacking Assad, leaving the way open for ISIS to take over Syria.

It’s as if the Three Stooges or Lauren and Hardy were in charge of the Pentagon.

D Troof wrote:

Observer of this thread wrote:

This was easily the best thread of the last few months, with a nice exchange of ideals and thoughts on important subject matter, but in true letsrun fashion, first it gets taken over by a obnoxious adolescent then two morons debating guns.

Do you people ever consider keeping your posts in the context of the discussion or does your self interest and absorption have no bounds?

Yeah, no one likes Trex. I think that is unanimous at this point.

Lol. You couldn't be a bigger idiot if you tried.

A) You are CLEARLY one of the "morons debating guns" in the appraisal of the mighty (and might I add, cowardly [typical name changer] ) poster named "Observer". Did you seriously miss that?? He's calingl YOU out, nimrod.

B) And even if he isn't also referring to you as the "obnoxious adolescent", he should be , because YOU are the one who started in, yet again, with the "BUTTHURTS!!! and "LIBTARDS!!" and pretending to be me, and the rest of your mind boggling infantile routine of yours. No one EVER on letsrun has performed in a more "obnoxious(ly) adolescent" manner as you did with that "shtick" of yours and you know it! And you STILL haven't admitted it or, or defended it, no, just sorta pretended it didn't happen. And look at you now, you were capable of writing fairly complete sentence, and semi-coherent thoughts all along. But instead, you considered writing "BUTTHURT!!!" and "LIBTARD!!!!" and "TROOF"" HA HA HA...over and over, and over, and over again as a good use of your time.

I'll say it again: you are BY FAR the biggest juvenile idiot I've encountered ANYwhere (in real life, on letsrun, or ANYwhere in cyberspace for that matter) Bar none. Congrats.

Like I said, no one likes Trex. Not even Trex.