Duh Silly wrote:
I wonder if Galen Rupp was training like this in high school???
He wasn't because Alberto had a well thought out plan for LONG TERM DEVELOPMENT. Ritz's highest international placing was his 3rd place world junior xc finish. Sacrificing long term development for short term gains. Maybe Ritz would have put the 10k AR in the 26:30s with Alberto's guidance from the start.
Look at this list of PRs by age
Bekele 26:17 (23 years old)
Geb 26:22 (24 years old)
Tergat 26:27 (28 years old)
Kemboi 26:30 (20 years old)
Negera 26:30 (21 years old)
Kogo 26:35 (20 years old)
Koech 26:36 (28 years old)
Tadese 26:37 (24 years old)
Hissou 26:38 (24 years old)
Hassan 26:38 (22 years old)
Sihine 26:39 (21 years old)
Kiprop 26:39 (19 years old)
Wanjiru 26:41 (18 years old)
Rotich 26:43 (21 years old)
Rupp 26:44 (28 years old)
Farah 26:46 (28 years old)
....
Solinsky 26:59 (25 years old)
...
Ritz 27:22 (26 years old)
Most runners hit their peaks in there early to mid-20s. You can claim age cheating, but I doubt that would change things by more than two years.
I don't understand the people on the boards who always blame coaches for training kids at a high level in high school.
Since your best years should typically occur around 23-25 years old shouldn't we be training a little harder at younger ages. Doing 50 miles a week for Grant Fisher can't possibly be the best thing for his long term development, because he won't reach his aerobic potential or the neuromuscular efficiency he needs to by 23-25. At this rate Fisher might be a good runner by the time he's 28 or 30, but thats past his prime.