Has anyone seen a Sasquatch while trail running?

In search of

Not search and rescue. KH-11 is not for search and rescue.

Whether bear or manape search and destroy has been the m.o.

I seriously doubt there are any left if they ever existed. There are a lot of dead ones thanks to modern ordinance delivery systems tested in that arena.

Sorry to spoil your Sasquatch party but it is what it is

"I would venture to guess that the majority of the posters who make the joking comments about this topic live in mostly urban areas."

-This. Mostly people that have rarely ventured off the beaten paths. Go to BC...Pacific NW...get lost..explore....you'll figure out that you're no longer at the top of the foodchain. You'll be shocked at waft is out there.

So we are more or less doing a bit of target practice on man-like subjects in the Northwest using instruments designed for recon? Not that this really surprises me... If that is the case, then they won't last long. The more interesting question is why do this? To save the logging industry? (or Oil sands industry) Look at what the spotted owl did back in the 90s to prevent industrial expansion. Now just imagine what the discovery of a Sasquatch might do to stop expansion in this area. If they really did exist and the Oil lobbyists found out, they would almost certainly look to protect their interests. just imagine what the reaction would be if they were in fact discovered and recognized. All of Canada would be a habitat sanctuary for the Sasquatch! Now that won't fly with those who have an economic interest....

Hey "Not gonna find one" Are you still out there? Do you really believe we would target practice on these creatures? Of course we have the technology to do so, but what would be our motive? Just look at the SR 71 Build on 1950s technology. It´s cameras could take photos from 80,000 feet that would allow you to read the fine print on a newspaper! Back in the day, It set the world speed record from London to Panama despite having to descend from 80,000 feet to 40,000 feet to refuel. If that is what we could deliver in the 1950´s, I cannot even begin to imagine what we have now-a-days when it comes to Recon. Would we deliberately try to exterminate them? To save the oil industry or the paper industry? What do you think....or know? Or can't you say?

Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:

In search of wrote:

i like your post...

You like his post?!? So, did you mean that you enjoy being mocked? Or you enjoy reading posts that you do not understand?

Because my posts RULE. Ha ha sucker nobody likes you.

In search of wrote:

What if there were just 3000 Sasquatch?

I would venture to guess that the majority of the posters who make the joking comments about this topic live in mostly urban areas. Out.

A very safe bet.

According to numbers released by the U.S. Census Bureau, 80.7 percent of the U.S. population lived in urban areas(2010 Census)

How big a population does the Sasquatch need to keep from going extinct?

Maybe as few as 600?

I expect to last this long at low population levels they have bred out all the problematic genes.

Rocket2 wrote:

Hey "Not gonna find one" Are you still out there? Do you really believe we would target practice on these creatures? Of course we have the technology to do so, but what would be our motive? Just look at the SR 71 Build on 1950s technology. It´s cameras could take photos from 80,000 feet that would allow you to read the fine print on a newspaper! Back in the day, It set the world speed record from London to Panama despite having to descend from 80,000 feet to 40,000 feet to refuel. If that is what we could deliver in the 1950´s, I cannot even begin to imagine what we have now-a-days when it comes to Recon. Would we deliberately try to exterminate them? To save the oil industry or the paper industry? What do you think....or know? Or can't you say?

can't say

i don't know the why, just the how

Yet he seems elusive too wrote:

In search of wrote:

What if there were just 3000 Sasquatch?

I would venture to guess that the majority of the posters who make the joking comments about this topic live in mostly urban areas. Out.

A very safe bet.

According to numbers released by the U.S. Census Bureau, 80.7 percent of the U.S. population lived in urban areas(2010 Census)

How big a population does the Sasquatch need to keep from going extinct?

Maybe as few as 600?

I expect to last this long at low population levels they have bred out all the problematic genes.

to keep from extinct they need 1 sasquatch

Umm no wrote:

Honestly just sounds like you're scared. The first thing you never saw anything, and the second time you "saw movement" which could be anything from a leave falling, a squirrel jumping, or a bear.

Don't forget ruffed grouse - the national give-you-a-heart-attack bird of the United States. These woodland and avian jerks have taken years off my life and pigmentation from my hair from the surprises they've given me while hiking and running.

Louie Louie wrote:

Umm no wrote:

Honestly just sounds like you're scared. The first thing you never saw anything, and the second time you "saw movement" which could be anything from a leave falling, a squirrel jumping, or a bear.

Don't forget ruffed grouse - the national give-you-a-heart-attack bird of the United States. These woodland and avian jerks have taken years off my life and pigmentation from my hair from the surprises they've given me while hiking and running.

Hitting the jug again Lou?

This one my farts were smelling so nasty that my neighbors called animal control. They thought either a sasquatch died our took a dump in the area

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

This one my farts were smelling so nasty that my neighbors called animal control. They thought either a sasquatch died ore took a dump in the area

fixed

I'm part of a Snipe Hunting Club, several members have claimed to have seen a Sasquatch on several occasions. If you are interested, you should learn to Snipe hunt first, it will help master your skills locating Sasquatch.

http://neoleadership.wordpress.com/2013/03/28/are-you-snipe-hunting/

I post about farting. Do you think I give a shit about proofreading my post before submitting?

have a fishnet stocking fetish wrote:

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

This one my farts were smelling so nasty that my neighbors called animal control. They thought either a sasquatch died ore took a dump in the area

fixed

Next time run right towards it.

That would be a bit like swimming towards a shark, or running towards a grizzly bear. Obviously you cannot relate to such an experience, but feel somehow inclined to comment on it to show me how foolish you think I am for posting it. It would take a huge act of courage to do what you are asking. Try petting a raccoon when it feels trapped! We had one that got stuck in our garage once when I was a kid. It was no joking matter trying to get it out. We had to call in the DNR. And that it a small animal. I realise you were being fecitious, however when it happens to you....it becomes very real. Anyway, thanks for reading the post. Perhaps one day we will get some solid proof and all you naysayers out there will suddenly change your tunes.

Bad Wigins wrote:

Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:

You like his post?!? So, did you mean that you enjoy being mocked? Or you enjoy reading posts that you do not understand?

Because my posts RULE. Ha ha sucker nobody likes you.

Being liked on LRC is a point of pride for you?

Seriously?

You are doing well in pretending to believe in fairies.

Butrery wrote:

I saw one and actually snapped a picture....

http://goo.gl/WgISw

If this it's what the OP thought he saw then, indeed they can run fast, much faster than any of you!