Media instigators pull out of Furguson after evidence piles up in support of police officer

Simple Justice wrote:

I will not support the police officer because he was bad at his job. Assuming the rumors (unconfirmed) about Michael Brown giving the cop an orbital fracture are true, assuming he "reached for his gun" (he didn't get it), assuming every worse possible, rumored, unconfirmed scenario, one fact still stands:

The cop couldn't avoid shooting an unarmed suspect. Furthermore, he had to shoot him six times, once in the head.

By any standard of police work, this guy is a terrible cop who is a danger to people.

1) He had to resort to deadly force against an unarmed person when he was in a freaking car to begin with (according to the cop).

2) He had to fire six times, not once.

3) He is a bad shot. You don't shoot people in the head when trying to disarm them.

Terrible cop

He's a danger to criminals and a savior of the law-abiding citizens. The streets need more cops like Wilson. Takes a sever beating and still takes the thug down.

First a 296 lbs. Pound man at 6'4 is armed. He assaulted the officer. The damage is so bad he didn't just give him an orbital blow out his eye was hanging slightly out of socket. Hard to shoot when you are fighting for your life and your eye is out of you head. He charged the officer again. Mike Brown was charged as a juvenile and did commit a crime earlier that day which speaks to his mind set. I am from the area and I can tell you very few people that support what the people of St. Louis have been doing this last week.

Don't you think it is odd that the police officer did not shoot at Brown's friend, who was walking with him?

It took the cops 9 days to concoct a story about Wilson's eye, and there's no evidence that any damage was caused by Brown. If Wilson's eye had been damaged at the start, why wasn't this reported to the press? It's possible that Wilson sustained the damage after the murder, and now they are trying to pin it on Brown. None of the witnesses who were at the scene saw any such attack or damage to Wilson.

Wilson murdered brown wrote:

It took the cops 9 days to concoct a story about Wilson's eye, and there's no evidence that any damage was caused by Brown. If Wilson's eye had been damaged at the start, why wasn't this reported to the press? It's possible that Wilson sustained the damage after the murder, and now they are trying to pin it on Brown. None of the witnesses who were at the scene saw any such attack or damage to Wilson.

As always , when witnesses are interviewed by the police and exact facts are brought out , the eye witness accounts never add up. Its actually about a 99% failure rate and when eye witness are asked about taking a lie detector test they seem not so sure about what they saw.

What will settle this case will probably be the dashboard tape , until we see it its all 100% speculation.

Wow.......

Do YOU even believe you? Its been reported numerous times that Wilson suffered no broken anything let along having his eye hanging slightly out of the socket......

[quote]Media excellence again. wrote:

Facts indicate no racism involved at all,

Other than a white cop shooting an unarmed black kid for the crime of walking in the street who had his hands raised in a surrender gesture.

box brah wrote:

And how many in just Chicago, just this week, by non cops?

Let's be real here.

Ever since IDF veteran and Israel loyalist Rahm Emanuel was put into place as mayor of Chicago it has been open season on black kids

kkkkkk wrote:

5 unarmed black men have been killed by police in the past month.

A very fine start. Keep up the good work. Other black men should feel a lot safer.

No cameras in this department's cruisers. Too bad too. No doubt it would have highlighted the savagery of the assault on the officer.

Quit spreading your lies and trying to persuade people with them. Him having a broken eye socket isn't even a question.

Correction Volk wrote:

[quote]Media excellence again. wrote:

Facts indicate no racism involved at all,

Other than a white cop shooting an unarmed black kid for the crime of walking in the street who had his hands raised in a surrender gesture.

I know you lime to THINK this is true, fact is no one that is credible has said he had his hands up. You also neglect to answer why or explain why Wilson didn't even shoot at Dorian Johnson. Fact is, as any intelligent person can see, Brown was shot and killed because he beat on a cop and then came after him again.Cop haters like you and the other "witnesses" who say Brown was shot at with his hands up as he ran away have no credibility because they already have evidence that this is not the case.If this was a racist crime, Wilson would have shot both Johnson and Brown. He didn't. He only eliminated the one who was a threat to him. Someone who minutes earlier committed strong arm robbery. Your defense of this thug is absolutely pathetic. I am so thankful Brown is no longer a threat to society.I saw a survey that said only 21% of blacks think Wilson did anything wrong. 26% said he did nothing wrong and the rest undecided.

Correction Volk wrote:

[quote]Media excellence again. wrote:

Facts indicate no racism involved at all,

Other than a white cop shooting an unarmed black kid for the crime of walking in the street who had his hands raised in a surrender gesture.

[quote]get used to it. wrote:

I know you lime to THINK this is true, fact is no one that is credible has said he had his hands up.

He was shot three times on the inside of his arm which could only occur if he had his hands raised.

You also neglect to answer why or explain why Wilson didn't even shoot at Dorian Johnson.

Not so. In fact, the cop shot several times at both men as they fled. He just missed them.

Fact is, as any intelligent person can see, Brown was shot and killed because he beat on a cop and then came after him again.

So Brown ran from the cop, only to stop and raise his hands after the cop shot at him several times. Then what. He runs at the armed, crazed cop to attack him all the while holding his hands up in surrender fashion?

Cop haters like you and the other "witnesses" who say Brown was shot at with his hands up as he ran away have no credibility because they already have evidence that this is not the case.

No, the incontrovertible forensic info shows this is exactly the case.

If this was a racist crime, Wilson would have shot both Johnson and Brown. He didn't.

He did shoot at both of them. Why is it not a racist crime because he only killed one unarmed black man and not more? You need to explain the "logic" behind such an assertions.

He only eliminated the one who was a threat to him. Someone who minutes earlier committed strong arm robbery.

The cop of course knew nothing about any accusations against Brown in the store so that comment has nothing to do with took place there. As far as the threat, the cop tried to pull Brown into the car for walking in the street, than shot at him several times as Brown fled, then murdered him when Brown surrendered. The actual threat was the cop toward Brown.

I saw a survey that said only 21% of blacks think Wilson did anything wrong. 26% said he did nothing wrong and the rest undecided.

A survey of Letsrun would likely show that well more then 26% think that murdering an unarmed black man who is surrendering is "nothing wrong'

Conclusion. Do you have any idea how much of a racist you are to spin this murder into a justified law enforcement action?

So punching cops and grabbing their guns without having to risk being shot by the cop is a civil right? Not exactly what Rosa Parks stood for.

Supporters of this guy are probably going to face a few problems. (1) His DNA was found on the gun/inside the car. (2) The Facebook video someone posted of the immediate aftermath recorded two people off camera describing the incident exactly how the cop said it happened. (3) His friend's description of the incident is clearly false. There are no shots to Brown's back, and his description of seeing Brown looking at him with a face in pain is impossible, as Brown was dead before he hit the ground. Plus, the way this friend described it, he (the friend) was simultaneously running away and hiding while watching the whole thing happen. Which is it?

In reference to M. Brown, you don't need the media to figure out that...

IF YOU PLAY STUPID GAMES YOU WIN STUPID PRIZES.

Brown is dead because of his own actions. Attack an LEO you can expect to be shot.

Surrender and you can expect to be murdered.

Your logic is faulty.

Cops shoot to stop, not to kill.

The "six shots" thing is easily misunderstood. Too, you're wrong to claim that a 10-foot gap means that the cop had "established distance." Ten feet is three yards. Have you ever been on a football field? Three yards is nothing. Brown could probably have run TWELVE yards--36 feet--in under two seconds. That's less time than it would take an officer to unholster, aim, and shoot his weapon. It's not very far.

For all we know, the cop may have tried to stop Brown by shooting anywhere BUT at his midsection and head. That would explain the arm injuries. Unfortunately, that doesn't stop him. The final shot or two, in rapid succession, were designed to stop somebody who the four earlier, more conservative shots didn't stop.

By the time he died, Brown had already committed several felonies and misdemeanors--theft, assault, assaulting a police officer, resisting arrest. He was high, and a bully. He was not the "gentle giant" that the media and his family portrayed him as.

What nobody is talking about is the heartbreak the family must have felt to realize that THE WEEKEND BEFORE HE WAS ABOUT TO BEGIN COLLEGE, their "gentle giant" was stealing blunts and physically assaulting a local businessman in order to get high. That is sad. That is just a sad joke. Was he trying to prove to his friends in the 'hood that his intelligence and ambition were nothing to be afraid of? You know: "I may be moving on up, but I'm still a criminal."

THAT is the unacknowledged tragedy here. The kid DID have ambition. He DID finish highschool. But he still needed to show that he was a thug.

If I'm his parents, that video in the convenience store broke my heart because it showed me all that. His death was just icing on the cake of his own refusal to grow up, man up, and head off to college without thugging out.