Discussion below please.
Discussion below please.
Wouldn't it be physically impossible to have the physical conditioning to finish the race off only a 10 mpw lifestyle? Or are you assuming/proposing as a hypothetical, former ultra-endurance athletes who have proven themselves before now switch to this do-nothing lifestyle?
My goodness people. Cross training. These threads aren't that interesting.
Hardloper wrote:
My goodness people. Cross training. These threads aren't that interesting.
True!! Why only 10 miles? Why not 9 or 11 or 16, etc. What's the deal with 10??
Hardloper wrote:
My goodness people. Cross training. These threads aren't that interesting.
True!! Why only 10 miles? Why not 9 or 11 or 16, etc. What's the deal with 10??
Hardloper wrote:
My goodness people. Cross training. These threads aren't that interesting.
None of your threads are interesting either. You're one of the worst contributors here, douchebag.
lane 8 wrote:
Hardloper wrote:My goodness people. Cross training. These threads aren't that interesting.
True!! Why only 10 miles? Why not 9 or 11 or 16, etc. What's the deal with 10??
Ooh, you're so edgy, you want to chose an arbitrary number one above or below the OPs maybe less than original pick. You sir are a MADMAN!!!!
You sir are a MADMAN!!!!
Thank You!! I consider that as a very high compliment!
Not one poster answered my question. I'm going to cry.
Xbgzfrys wrote:
Not one poster answered my question. I'm going to cry.
LOL!!
In 2008, I was at a 100 miler that a competitor apparently finished on 0 mpw. He did tons and tons of hot yoga, but didn't run at all in training. His time was slow (27 hours-ish), but he made it to the line. With focused cross training and 10 miles of very steep hill work, I could still see people running WS100 in sub-17 hours.