is this a joke ???
can't you read or think ???
Bob ran 10.06 on dirt chewed-up by immediate prior finish of 20k walk before his race in lane-1
without that messed-up dirt, he wouda been looking at
~ 9.95 - 10.00
in same run
here is actual :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9Ff4P7QrQohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ88Iq_GGjcon synthetic of '68 onwards, worst he was looking at is
9.75 - 9.80
nonsense
he was 10.05 - 10.07 guy at peak
got beat 2 v 1 against floyd & lost zurich
legend
eh ???
are you are a fuucking idiot ???
if you had clue about 100m, you woud realise it was best ever run until Carl at least started running 100s
fact
eh ???
i damn well do !!!
how inept are you ???
guys in lane 2 - 8 had virtually virgin track but Big Bob got shafted with lane-1 where 20k walk just before had chomped it to smithereens
eh ???
do you have any clue about sprinting ???
he won it in most legendary run until at least '84
wells running 10.11 in prelim in '80 was utter drivel compared to Bob in '64
eh ??
what is this drivel ???
i am only happy with nearest to absolute truth
the absolute truth by end-'80 is that wells was 2nd best guy of year at best, after floyd, discounting injured Sanford, who, if uninjured, wouda probably run
~ 10.00
easing up in a prelim v wells 10.11pb
sanford was quantum leap better
utter drivel
have you not been able to comprehend brit documentary of pumping brit guys with drugs in '80 ???
idiot
he was kid
what previous you expect ???
what the fuuck was wells doing at 19y for 100 ???
idiot
he ran 10.07 in america
country where guys before had run 10.03 on domestic soil
country which produced
Riddick running 10.05 into a 1.2 !!! in Zurich !!! in '75 !!!
that last run was worth at worst a basic :
9.99
what the f***ck was wells' fastest in a zurich/brussels/rome/etc ???
nonsense
i only look at runs listed in history
eh ?
only of relevant
wells has non-similar reputation after broadcast
long gone with death of "supplier"...
clueless
huge number of allegations
why does wells never get invited to commentate on sprints for last 30+y ???
easy $ 5- 10k / year money for nothing effort ???
why is he is doing ? labouring work for past 30+y instead of invited by domestic tv to commentate on sprints ???
no
no one does
do you have clue about sprints ???
utterly clueless
200 is nonsense event
it took 19.32 to even get it look into ballpark of 100 interest, even with bailey running 9.84wr, that still got most press interest after games
"19.32" if he'd run 100 was in 9.7-low/mid shape off that & wouda whupped bailey, but no one was interested then or now
you have any clue about sprints ?
utter drivel
mo 6.39 / 9.79 was fantastic interest
woeful
clueless about sprinting