beast girl wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7249jj7qFM
From 0:45 to 0:55 I genuinely thought that was a woman speaking.
beast girl wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7249jj7qFM
From 0:45 to 0:55 I genuinely thought that was a woman speaking.
This is funny enough, except your cut and paste job makes is appear that I wrote the second paragraph, which I didn't.
Dohflex wrote:
Montesquieu wrote:This is an idiotic comparison. Cain has a good chance to meet the "A" standard in the 1500 this year; she has a good chance to make the World team this year; Cain is already a national class runner on the senior level. Baxter might become a national class runner in the 5 and 10
Cain is clearly better on the track at any distance 2 miles or below. Baxter may break 10:00 or even around 9:50, but she will not approach 9:40.
But Baxter has been HELD BACK in her running. She literally has a squad of boys whose only job is to grab her and tackle her to the ground if she begins to run fast AT ALL in training. Her highest mileage was 53 miles... for the YEAR. She does most of her training in army boots while doing her AP calculus homework. She wanted to run an extra lap at NXN, but her coach tackled her at the finish line to keep her from continuing. She doesn't run in the mud, the mud IMPLORES her to "Step here!" so that it can buoy her forward. The rest of the mud gets mad and spits in the eye of Mary Cain.[/quote]
beast girl wrote:
Mary Cain just ran 5:05
Race time is not a sufficient statistic. Don't know what that means, it is not a descriptive term, it is a technical term so look it up if you do not know its meaning.
At the end of the day, Baxter 'may' have the best career because she is looper. Baxter's lower leg slings as opposed to planting, which is ineffective for speed, but you stay healthy and have a long career. Athletes like Mary Decker, Kim Gallagher and Suzy Hamilton were beautiful to watch, but they could not stay healthy, Baxter on the other hand looks like Denna Kaster and Jordan Hasay.
freezeframe wrote:
She is so awkward............ AWKWARD as hell.
is she or is she confident and well ajusted enough not to pander
One hundred years from now this will be a trivia question:
WHO BEAT MARY CAIN TWICE AND NEVER, NOT EVER, NO NEVER, NO WAY EVER, NOT EVEN ONCE, NOT EVEN THAT CLOSE TO ONCE EVEN IN SANSKRIT (WHATEVER ONCE IS IN SANSKRIT) LOST TO MARY CAIN?
fgfg wrote:
freezeframe wrote:She is so awkward............ AWKWARD as hell.
is she or is she confident and well ajusted enough not to pander
What do you mean by pandering and well adjusted?