Canada1978 wrote:
Remind us - why should we care who you respect?
Where in the post did I ask you to care about my opinion?
Of course you did anyway or you wouldn't have replied to it.
Canada1978 wrote:
Remind us - why should we care who you respect?
Where in the post did I ask you to care about my opinion?
Of course you did anyway or you wouldn't have replied to it.
"For every cheater, there are 99 of us doing it right"
In the Top 100 of cycling, there are 99 cheaters of everyone who is doing it right.
In the Top 100 of running, there are probably 2 who are doing it right for every cheater.
A Duck wrote:
I think her writing last week, as opposed to after athletes tested positive on the women's side at the Olympics...
You know where was her passionate rant then?
Oh, gee, I don't know -- maybe because everyone in the civilized world knows who Lance Armstrong is, whereas no one except for niche sports fans have heard of those women?
I'll make this more clear for you with an example. If you were arrested for stealing a car, no one would notice or care besides your friends, neighbors and family members. If Lebron James got busted for Grand Theft Auto, it would be headline news around the country and most of the rest of the world as well.
People don't need to be Lauren fans to appreciate what she's at least trying to do here.
yes, sir... wrote:
Lauren's letter was for no other purpose than to garnish publicity for herself.
*presses fingers to temples, squeezes eyes shut, shakes head miserably*
I like how she calls herself a "pro-athlete" Yeah try winning something. Lauren and not just the race to get pregnant. Silly women who think.
hoop de doo dum. wrote:
I like how she calls herself a "pro-athlete" Yeah try winning something. Lauren and not just the race to get pregnant. Silly women who think.
Had you written this in English, what would it have attempted to convey?
Lauren *is* a pro athlete. She's paid to run. She's been on several World Champs teams.
Try winning something, you say? She's won a pair of 5,000-meter national titles.
I'm not surprised at the racism on this board, but I admit to being somewhat surprised at the level of outright scorn toward women. Seriously, would you say that shit about women trying to think to your daughter or even a female friend?
Lauren could have doped herself.
She wasn't being tested 24/7.
Easy to microdose and use grey area supps and pass inept USADA testing.
what did you mean to say there lol, try not arguing with so much emotion
Pediatric gynecologist wrote:
hoop de doo dum. wrote:I like how she calls herself a "pro-athlete" Yeah try winning something. Lauren and not just the race to get pregnant. Silly women who think.
Had you written this in English, what would it have attempted to convey?
Lauren *is* a pro athlete. She's paid to run. She's been on several World Champs teams.
Try winning something, you say? She's won a pair of 5,000-meter national titles.
I'm not surprised at the racism on this board, but I admit to being somewhat surprised at the level of outright scorn toward women. Seriously, would you say that shit about women trying to think to your daughter or even a female friend?
ooOoooOOoooo! :D
I'm pretty sure you can say that about 100% of people who haven't been tested 24/7. They all could have doped. Yes, that possibility is always there...lurking in the corner :D
What's the dealio? Why do you want me to have a doping problem? I fear you will be terribly disappointed at how vanilla I am. Though I do looked drugged sometimes when I didn't remove my mascara from the night before.
I am confused as to your response. Do you feel I used the word garnish inappropriately?
Wounded Buffalo soldier wrote:
yes, sir... wrote:Lauren's letter was for no other purpose than to garnish publicity for herself.
*presses fingers to temples, squeezes eyes shut, shakes head miserably*
It's almost lunchtime. You could take an early lunch, sneak over here, plant a big one on me, give me a good shake, pat me on the bum and tell me I"m going to do great. I really need it. I really really do.
. . . wrote:
what did you mean to say there lol, try not arguing with so much emotion
Pediatric gynecologist wrote:[quote]hoop de doo dum. wrote:
I'm not surprised at the racism on this board, but I admit to being somewhat surprised at the level of outright scorn toward women. Seriously, would you say that shit about women trying to think to your daughter or even a female friend?
No one mentioned her race dillhole. Lauren hasn't done anything lately except spread her legs for babymaking.
She's also just trying to get attention for her shit "aka picky" bars.
yes, sir wrote:
I am confused as to your response.
You are evidently confused as to a lot of things.
Let me give you a couple of hints. Have you ever heard of the IRS garnering anyone's wages? Have you ever added a garner -- say, paprika -- to a dish to make it more appealing?
you really are an a*shole.
Um, yes, but garnish has other meanings. Check out dictionary.com.
Synonyms: adorn, array, beautify, bedeck, bedizen, blazon, caparison, deck, do, doll up, do up, drape, dress, embellish, emblaze, emboss, enrich, fancify, fancy up, festoon, decorate, glitz (up), grace, gussy up, ornament, pretty (up), trim
So she is garnishing attention on herself...i.e. making herself look better.
Perhaps though I could have also used the word garner, but that isn't exactly where I was going with the thought. I wasn't just trying to say she was trying to bring attention to herself, but to bring attention to herself and make herself look better in the process.
Hmmm, tempting, but I need a picture first.
iloveu wrote:
It's almost lunchtime. You could take an early lunch, sneak over here, plant a big one on me, give me a good shake, pat me on the bum and tell me I"m going to do great. I really need it. I really really do.
okay, but are you drinking? See I have to be focused today and I'm not going to be focused if I am worried that you are drinking again.
garner/ garnering you dipstick.
Sweet Lauren and a couple of her FB friends saw this thread. Letsrun 1, ignoring letsrun: 0