Ashmeade 9.97, Bledman 9.89 in Orlando!!!!!

Who?

Sprintgeezer wrote:

again I hope the time is legit.

why would it not be legit?

Why would it not be legit?

...dito

The prevalence of drugs in running.

well first aint no one heard of this dude so you gotta suspect something is up.

second is this the track where a couple of years ago tyson gay and a few caribbean men and women ran crazy times at some 'meet' that no one knew about and they didnt touch those times the rest of the year? or was that in clermont?

Like Clermont track, this Orlando track must to be downhill or short, or bad wind readings, or the timer is turned on later than normal.

Bledman is a 10.0x athlete at his peak...maybe high 9.9x being generous.

So you have at least 4 "superfast tracks" (without altitude advantage) in the circuit:

Eugene

Clermont

Rieti

That Orlando track

Of course...the times are almost bogus.

Note that some weeks ago, Travis Padgett was running on the 10.2x's...and now he ran 10.04 in Orlando!!! He must be a magician!

Or that Junior called Tyreek Hill...who ran 10.19 in Orlando at the same meet. 10.19 at 18 years old is awesome.

Same with Bledman (ran SB 10.06 in Rio some weeks ago, and regular 10.0x's and 10.1x's in IAAF circuit)

Same with Ramone McKenzie - (10.10 in Clermont 10 days ago...impossible!)

Same with Cordero Gray (10.11 in...in..let me guess...CLERMONT!!)

Same with Dentarius Locke (ran his PB in...oh! Clermont again!)

Same with Irish Paralympian Jason Smyth. Ran his SB at Clermont (10.24...+1.5 wind). His PB is 10.22 with +2.0 wind last year, again in Clermont. And he will try to make "A" Olympic standard this weekend in...let me see...oh!! bingo!! Clermont!!!

Nesta Carter 9.78, Ryan Bailey 9.87, Forsythe 9.95, Bledman 9.89, Ashmeade 9.95...ALL BOGUS.

9.89 is fast, especially this early in the season at a small meet. However, Bledman has run fast before, he has been around 10 flat for a couple of years, but he has not run fast when it counts. I never see him in the big finals or DL meets holding his own against the big boys. With that said, 9.89 is 9.89; he is now someone we have to keep our eyes on.

Ah, a 9.89 is sometimes not a 9.89

I showed last year how the times from Clermont and Eugene in the 100 were bogus. Many, including myself, believe that Rieti is also bogus, and suspect Doha as well.

It might be too early to do any kind of analysis on the Orlando meet this year, but in the meantime we should keep our eye on these results.

I might have to add another venue to my PR circuit of meets.

Oh... my... God...

While not understanding exactly what it is that you mean by that comment, I will say that both Bledman and Ashmeade looked really good in those videos that I linked to--REALLY good, which is why I think the times might possibly be legit.

It would be really great if Bledman were to prove himself a bona fide 9.8x guy this year. So far, including Bledman, there are FIVE 9.8x guys this year...in MAY!!!

Unprecedented.

Plus, if Ashmeade was real, he just might bump somebody from the relay team...although Carter has proven himself to be a dependable first leg.

Sprintgeezer wrote:I showed last year how the times from Clermont and Eugene in the 100 were bogus. Many, including myself, believe that Rieti is also bogus, and suspect Doha as well

let's see this drivel

if it is an iaaf certified track/accurate auto timing & fully working wind gauge which are pre-requisites which are assumed, then tell us which other factors make the times "bogus" ???

You can search for it yourself, VenTARD, it's on this forum.

Lazy VenTARD.

I regret the incivility, VenTARD, but I can't bring myself to feel anything for you but contempt. Even in this last post you couldn't avoid the insulting use of the word "drivel".

Up yours, VenTARD.

I'm kinda lazy too. What are you talking about SG?

Sprintgeezer wrote:

You can search for it yourself, VenTARD, it's on this forum.

Lazy VenTARD.

Please, please don't make me satisfy any request VenTARD has made, if only indirectly.

Sprintgeezer wrote:You can search for it yourself, VenTARD, it's on this forum.

Lazy VenTARD.

moron

it's going to be utter drivel

i just wanted to give the forum a laugh when whatever crap you

"showed last year how the times from Clermont and Eugene in the 100 were bogus. Many, including myself, believe that Rieti is also bogus, and suspect Doha as well"

was put up for annihilation

Ventolin...Keston Bledman has no chances to run sub 9.90 in another track.

He only can run 9.89 in Clermont, Eugene or Rieti. That's for sure.

Sign me up for the Ventolin^3 bandwagon, what possible factors do you think can be making times at a track "bogus"?

Put up or shut up homie, this is a forum, not your blog, give some deets.

Ben Wrong wrote:Ventolin...Keston Bledman has no chances to run sub 9.90 in another track.

He only can run 9.89 in Clermont, Eugene or Rieti. That's for sure.

idiot

look at those other guys he blew away in that race

oh yes, of course, the 2nd - 8th guys will never run a faster 100 this season...