I'm not sure how BFS works exactly I guess. Does someone have an incentive to push the program? The FB coach is pushing it pretty hard, but I figured it was just because he wanted his FB players to be in the weight room.
He has discouraged all FB players from running track because we don't lift as much as they would in his program.
I have the distance runners use the weight room a couple times a week, but only incorporate light weight/high rep squats on the weight racks. The rest of their resistance training is done off the machines (med ball work, body weight squats, plyo drills, pull/chin ups, pushups, ab work, etc..)
The sprinters do cleans and squats as their core lifts, along with other supplemental lifts.
The throwers do the BFS program and I really don't have an issue with that because they also do a lot of extra explosive drills after the BFS lifting session. I have a throws coach that writes their workouts, and he is also a FB assistant coach. I didn't have a problem with the program until this year when I lost most of my star sprinters and was told I have to do this particular program.
I can't go to my AD about this because he seems to have no understanding about how different sports demand different training. Also, the BFS cycle does not fit in with our schedule. We need recover days, and we cannot be lifting heavy the day before a meet. I think it's dangerous and counter-productive to the kids' training....am I wrong in thinking that? I feel like this is some sort of practical joke!...how can an athletic department full of educated former athletes possibly think this is good for a school?
I need articles and direct examples of how this is detrimental to a school's sports program.
I've also been told that I need to combine the girls and boys programs. Aren't there gender equity issues there? Title nine issues?