lolz
lolz
23 seconds off the outdoor world record (and 7 seconds faster than Alan Webb)! Geez, I am impressed!
you're not very good at understanding statistics.
Plenty of people were probably impressed, but only 4% think that her performance was the MOST impressive of the weekend.
Go back to class.
lt7i9l wrote:
lolz
I think you need to go back and read what you wrote.
this just in wrote:
you're not very good at understanding statistics.
Plenty of people were probably impressed, but only 4% think that her performance was the MOST impressive of the weekend.
Go back to class.
You aren't very good at reading. That 7:43 3k is the most impressive athletic performance in the history of womynkind!
The 96% who voted for others are idiots.
bro montana wrote:
lt7i9l wrote:lolz
I think you need to go back and read what you wrote.
I think you need to go back and read what the poll says.
its funny because the brojos cant read.
malmo wrote:
this just in wrote:you're not very good at understanding statistics.
Plenty of people were probably impressed, but only 4% think that her performance was the MOST impressive of the weekend.
Go back to class.
You aren't very good at reading. That 7:43 3k is the most impressive athletic performance in the history of womynkind!
The 96% who voted for others are idiots.
I'm not making any judgments about what is or is not impressive... all I'm saying is that the assertion that only 4% of letsrunners find her performance impressive is incorrect.
you supider than brojos. 7:43 not girls time--it boys time.
runerpe8rso2 wrote:
you supider than brojos. 7:43 not girls time--it boys time.
Doesn't matter who's time it is... they could have said that the time was 1:45 for 3k... it still doesn't change the fact that the 4% is incorrect.
If you want to make fun of the brojos for typos... there are plenty of threads for that
If she was hot, it would be different.
If she ran 7:43, we'd be very impressed.