Global Warming is a Hoax

-22 real feel and a foot of snow here. Al Gore is a hypocrite, a liar, and an idiot. And he didn't invent the Internet either.

0 degrees, icy, and a few inches of snow here. Al Gore is a piece of crap.

Not going to make a stance on whether global warming is or isn't real but your evidence is rather poor. Saying its cold LOCALLY doesn't by any stretch of the imagination mean that GLOABAL warming is a hoax. Also, more snow supports global warming because when it is hotter water evaporates faster so there is more water going up into the air and by definition more water coming back down which means more preciipitation, in this case snow.

Beside the fact that 2010 was tied for the warmest year on record, you guys are COMPLETELY right.

I am always amazed when I learn that people don't believe in global warming. I view it as kind of like being fat, sure there may be some genetic and environmental factors, but with hard work you can overcome it.

The notion that global warming is fake is on par with creationism and the idea that the earth is flat and the center of the universe. Every argument you could possibly have against global warming is flawed in some way and the thought that humans have nothing to do with it and there will be no serious conseqences flies in the face of reality and any scientist who has done any research whatsoever into the phenomenon of global warming and does not believe that it is true, serious and caused by humans doesn't deserve to be called a scientist.

Gbgurt wrote:

Not going to make a stance on whether global warming is or isn't real but your evidence is rather poor. Saying its cold LOCALLY doesn't by any stretch of the imagination mean that GLOABAL warming is a hoax. Also, more snow supports global warming because when it is hotter water evaporates faster so there is more water going up into the air and by definition more water coming back down which means more preciipitation, in this case snow.

1st. You are right, they don't do a very good job at supporting there statement causing them to come across as ignorant.

2nd. You are wrong. This weather is caused by la nina which is the lowering in the oceans temperature in the tropics of up to 5 degrees Celsius. Unlike el nino which caused 2005 to be such a bad hurricane season. These are natural weather occurrences that would be very hard to prove weather "global warming" is causing it or not. In short, its easy to sell to people that these weather events are caused by the oceans temperature going up, and the oceans temperature is going up because the earths is. However in reality, I think the scientist should be the ones telling us this and not politicians. It's quite obvious that this has to do more with political agendas then is does science.

The sea level used to be 130 feet lower than before we became industrialized. so tell me, is it possible the climate can change that drastically before humans had any impact or is the biblical flood true. You can only choose one.

How the hell does global warming lead to another ice age???

Next time help yourself to a textbook because you sound like a F*%$in' idiot!!!

Okay you chose option A. Thank you for proving my point that there is massive change in climate before man became industrialized.

I agree 100% with the OP, I have always said this. GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX!!!!

1. Global warming is a hoax.

2. Al Gore is an idiot.

3. If you believe in the global warming myth then you too are an idiot.

Do you have solid prof the ocean has risen 130 feet? I live on the ocean up in Maine, 16 feet above sea level, and when looking at pictures from 90 years ago, land marks that were right on the ocean such beaches, are still there with no sign of the water being any bit closer to them....I seem to always see these pictures of what would happen to the coast if the sea raised 10 feet and I would think after 130 feet, there would be whole towns under water. Yet for some reason everything appears to look the same as it did 100 years ago.

The pile is super cool wrote:

How the hell does global warming lead to another ice age???

Next time help yourself to a textbook because you sound like a F*%$in' idiot!!!

Chet - Redneck: How about we cause more global warming? So that in the future the polar ice caps melt; and it ushers in a new ice age.

Pissed off Redneck: How the hell is global warming going to cause an ice age?

Chet - Redneck: Well you know, the global warming could be on a climate shift or something.

Pissed off Redneck: Chet, you are a f***in' retard you know that? Even IF global warming were real, which all proven scientific data shows it isn't, it would take millions of years for a climate shift to happen. You think an ice age can just happen all a sudden like?

Chet - Redneck: Well I was just trying to be helpful.

Pissed off Redneck: Well help yourself to a f***in' science book, cause you're talking like a f***in' retard

That is one of my all time favorite south park quotes.

I saw something similar to this story randomly on yahoo. It is an underwater city of the coast of India. If you look at historical sea level it is much more.

http://www.hermetics.org/cambay.html

So like I said the earth is capable of massive change in climate before humans, or the biblical flood is true.

good point, it snowed today, global warming can't be real. never mind the fact that the 8 hottest years on record have been in the past decade, it was cold and snowed today.

weather and climate are two different things, a warming atmosphere would create more intense weather variation like we have been seeing. it would also create higher global annual temperature averages, like we have been seeing...

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

the rise in atmospheric carbon matches the temperature changes perfectly. both the temperature and carbon are increasing at extremely high levels, higher than could possibly be attributed to solely natural causes. Although there are natural causes for increases in atmospheric carbon these variations have a unique carbon isotope fingerprint. The carbon being pumped into the atmosphere now is istopoically lighter than any natural sources. this is because the fossil fuels we are burning are isotopically light. (

http://green.yahoo.com/blog/climate411/134/how-we-know-humans-cause-global-warming-part-2-of-5-chemistry.html

) despite what fox news may say there is no actual scientific ambiguity in regards to the existence of anthropogenic global warming.

Exactly right.....except for the fact that the Arctic glaciers have been melting for HUNDREDS- if not thousands- of years.It's nice to finally have a climate scientist chime in on Letsrun though. Haha.Temperatures have NOT kept pace with the early GW projections of carbon in the atmosphere. Think about all the carbon being pumped into the air EVERY FUKKING SECOND of EVERY FUKKING DAY....for the last 100 years....and we're talking about the tempteratures increasing 0.5 degrees AT TIMES (also not at times)? And we'll say that's causing the glaciers to melt?Oh, and I own a Honda Civic Hybrid, just for kicks.

a wrote:

the rise in atmospheric carbon matches the temperature changes perfectly. both the temperature and carbon are increasing at extremely high levels, higher than could possibly be attributed to solely natural causes. Although there are natural causes for increases in atmospheric carbon these variations have a unique carbon isotope fingerprint. The carbon being pumped into the atmosphere now is istopoically lighter than any natural sources. this is because the fossil fuels we are burning are isotopically light. (

http://green.yahoo.com/blog/climate411/134/how-we-know-humans-cause-global-warming-part-2-of-5-chemistry.html

) despite what fox news may say there is no actual scientific ambiguity in regards to the existence of anthropogenic global warming.

I predict warming sometime over the next two months. I can't wait.

That civilization dates back to 9,000 years ago. Which is right around the time of the end of the last ice age. Meaning, most likely when glaciers thawed they released back in to the ocean causing a rise in the oceans level. The industrial revolution, when we started releasing larger amounts co2 into the air, is considered to be the 18th and 19th century. This rise in the oceans level which occurred over 9,000 years ago could not have been caused by our effect on the environment. So going back to what you originally posted, the sea level has not risen 130 feet scenes we became industrialized, in fact it has risen 130 feet after the last ice age over 9,000 years ago. I can understand that that if all the glaciers were to melt right now the sea would rise, but how do you connect these events with global warming due to our industrialization if it occurred over NINE THOUSAND YEARS AGO?