Probably the most important film in decades gets snubbed by Hollywood liberals.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/superman_slapped_FZm1642OnX19HNjf4jflNM
"Welcome to reverse McCarthyism. Not only are conservatives unwelcome (bordering on unemployable) in Hollywood, but even fully paid-up and lionized liberals like Guggenheim must be shunned for making a case that conservatives agree with."
The New York Post? Great.
In any case, doesn't this very same column suggest that all "liberal" critics loved and praised this movie? So it didn't make the cut of five nominees. Gosh, what a VAST liberal conspiracy.
Zzzzzzz.
It's Hollywood faggies that wire up shit teams in the BCS for ratings.
Nomination for dumbest post of the year...
Waiting for Superman wrote:
Probably the most important film in decades gets snubbed by Hollywood liberals.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/superman_slapped_FZm1642OnX19HNjf4jflNM"Welcome to reverse McCarthyism. Not only are conservatives unwelcome (bordering on unemployable) in Hollywood, but even fully paid-up and lionized liberals like Guggenheim must be shunned for making a case that conservatives agree with."
Waiting for Superman wrote:
Probably the most important film in decades gets snubbed by Hollywood liberals.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/superman_slapped_FZm1642OnX19HNjf4jflNM"Welcome to reverse McCarthyism. Not only are conservatives unwelcome (bordering on unemployable) in Hollywood, but even fully paid-up and lionized liberals like Guggenheim must be shunned for making a case that conservatives agree with."
On what basis do you make the claim that this is probably the most important film in decades? It is a biased slant that presents something that most people already know (schools in poor areas suck). It's call to action is weak, and nothing has actually happened as a result of the film. It was not a great achievement in cinematography (of course neither were half the movies nominated). Why should it have been nominated? Just because it made people feel bad for some kids? Too bad none of those people who felt bad actually did anything. A good documentary might have led to more change.