Skip - good question and there are many good answers, some of which emphasize the physiological, some the psychological, some both. How you treat a long run in your training, in my opinion, depends where your emphasis lies in racing at the end of roughly a 6-month cycle. The longer your goal race (5,000m +), the more important having a consistent long-run every 7-14 days becomes.If you are bored, it probably means you're no longer getting a fitness benefit and your body is stale with it. Trust that instinct and develop in other ways besides the cookie-cookie program of 2 workouts and a long run every week. Try something like this:Let's say your primary race is the 1500 or the 5000 coming from the 1500 rather than the 10k:Space your long run out to once every 2 weeks. In the middle week, complete a 75' modified long run where you build up your speed throughout, hitting a period where you are at your 60' long-fast pace and then go beyond that near the end. This will help build the strength to increasing the stress within your actual 60' runs and make the 90' long runs seem a bit like a gift. Let's say your primary race is the 5000 or 10000:Complete a shorter long-fast tempo (say, 20'-40') each week plus one of a 50'-70' variety. The shorter tempo would be faster than the longer tempo. Each week, set out to do a long run of at least 80', but at 40' or 50', start increasing the effort and if you feel good, try to stretch the long run beyond 90' on that day. If you don't feel good by the time you get to 80', simply cut it off and do a shorter long run that week so you're not slogging through. If every 1-3 weeks you feel good and are running fast beyond 90', then you're strength will improve. This is never a bad thing.Note: You are essentially trying to build a bridge between these types of training (ie., long reps (1k-3k), short tempos (20-40'), long tempos (50' - 75'), and long runs (75' - 100')) that, for sake of space, I am suggesting are inherent to building a long-term improvement curve without a full justification. I am saying these things assuming a certain amount of philosophical agreement. How deep into your ~6-month cycle you want to take these different components comes back, again, to what your goal race is and what your philosophies are in terms of supporting and specific work in the peak race season.
skip wrote:
thanks long and fast, how about using your 6 week progression in place of my 90min run, to be honest getting real bored with running easy for 90min every week and really don't feel like it's a benefit at all
As for your original question, I don't think you implied you should only progress for six weeks, but just in case, I don't want to give you an impression that is not in line with my beliefs. That is, a long-fast run necessitates well-beyond a 6-week progression. I believe it's something you want to be continuously developing through the majority of every 6-month cycle. I simply left it at 6 to get you started and, after that, either use your internal measures as your way to extend your efforts or simply follow a logical extension of that beginning 6-week model and stretch it to 12 - 16 weeks by, among other methods, increasing the pace and going beyond 60'.
A final note for this post: ask yourself why you run easy for an entire 90'. At some point, you do get an aerobic benefit by being out there that long. But you can get more out of it mentally and physically - which is one way to keep it fresh - by making it more challenging?
To take, admittedly, an oversimplified stance by looking at the merits of philosophies that have dominated distance running the last 30-40 years, can we suppose that a combination of quality and quantity has been the catalyst to the evolution in speed seen in the 5k - Marathon the past 15 years, rather than an adherence to one of those ideologies?
If yes, then we can run long to race long races, but run fast, as well, to run those long races faster.
Run long and fast. Get better. Period.