"These functional PJs have a unique, patent-pending design that makes them not only escape-proof but diaper access-proof as well."
I don't have a child, so I clearly don't understand parenting. Why is it a bad thing to have access to the diaper? Wouldn't a parent want access to the diaper for changing purposes? Or is it just easier to take off the entire PJs and change the kid?
runsforfuns wrote:
"These functional PJs have a unique, patent-pending design that makes them not only escape-proof but diaper access-proof as well."
I don't have a child, so I clearly don't understand parenting. Why is it a bad thing to have access to the diaper? Wouldn't a parent want access to the diaper for changing purposes? Or is it just easier to take off the entire PJs and change the kid?
I don't have a kid either, but since I run with Paul (the founder of EscapeeJays) a lot, I know a little bit about the pajamas.
The goal is to prevent the kid from having access to his/her diaper. The whole reason Escapee Jays came about is if a kid can get in his own diaper a huge mess can be everywhere in the morning. That was the problem EscapeeJays solve.
Some kids just get out of their clothes without getting into the diaper but that is another problem.
wejo wrote:
The goal is to prevent the kid from having access to his/her diaper. The whole reason Escapee Jays came about is if a kid can get in his own diaper a huge mess can be everywhere in the morning. That was the problem EscapeeJays solve.
This was such a problem that an entire line of jammies was invented to address? Seems like this would be more of a problem with adult diapers (patent pending).
Yes, they need an update to "Oops I Crapped My Pants" called "Oops I crapped my pants and then ripped off my clothes and threw my feces all over the room."