She runs 1:59.90

TheTruthOrConsequences wrote:

The ladies should just refuse to run with Caster.

I agree.

They were being way too nice to him a year ago and still are.

I think of a guy hopped in there and said "I'm a guy", and the IAAF let him run, the women would still not say much.

I guess that's because they are classy, and focused on doing their best whatever the obstacles.

But it's still not right to let him run with the women.

It's not right, and everyone should speak up against the travesty so it stops.

knofosho wrote:

What a joke... I agree with you wholeheartedly.

Needs to grow a pair....she has a pair internal and have not dropped.

True theses past three races have been effortless tempo runs hitting her goal on point perfectly.

This just infuriates me that WOMEN have to race this "in between sex" person with obvious advantages of male hormones during the 20 yrs of his development. Very bad KARMA for South African Athletics, IAAF, and Caster.

I DO Believe that Semanya, now fully aware, is just as crooked, and slimy as the coaches, federation, and IAAF for running against women and acting like the races are fair.

Not Good Karma, Bad JUJU will ensue this cheaterator.

I'm pretty sure he was the first one to know.

Track and Field was the one place the rules mattered. Letting this hermaphrodite compete with women is not only unfair to women, it undermines the entire sports credibility.

Has anyone watched the video of the race? She makes a mockery of it by staying in the middle of the pack and then weaving in and out in the last 50. At least it was entertaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgCe3zZyDtw

Did you hear that voice in the interview? Shirley Temple not.

There is no doubt Caster was taking it easy all the way... could have won by 20 meters. You could see the look of frustration/anger on the ladies behind.

thanks for the link...clearly (s)he can win any 800m race (s)he wants...with a negative split too.

rojo wrote:

Has anyone watched the video of the race? She makes a mockery of it by staying in the middle of the pack and then weaving in and out in the last 50. At least it was entertaining.

this seems like an unduly cynical perspective. she "weaves" in the last straightaway exactly once. she tries to pass on the inside, sees the opening closing and shifts to the outside of lane 1/ inside of lane 2. she seems to be running all out after that point.

as for the earlier parts of the race, she's holding back, yes, but wouldn't any athlete racing at the top level for the first time in over a year? (in an 800)

that said, as we all discussed last year in depth, this is a challenging situation. i hope the IAAF imposed some sort of hormone testing. she doesn't look as ripped as she did last year, which may reflect hormone treatment or it may be a sign that she didn't work out quite as hard this year due to uncertainty regarding IAAF procedures.

as much as the caster semenya of last year appeared to clearly be over any sensible line for defining female for athletic purposes, the issue of line drawing is certainly rife with difficulty. there isn't a single world championships finalist who is not a genetic outlier. even with hard training and dedication, there is something extremely unique and special (in an athletic sense) about their dna.

not fair either way wrote:

She's not completely male either, so would it be fair to allow her to compete as a man? The divisions are male and female, not female and other.

I think you are incorrect.

There is one open division for anyone who can qualify, regardless of gender (but so far only men have been able to qualify).

Then there is another division for women only. I figure, to be in that division, one needs to be 100% female, otherwise, compete in the open division.

Is it me or does she look kind of like Pootie-Tang?

http://www.imdb.com/media/rm283746048/tt0258038

So women are the default category for all hermaphrodites with distinctly male genital and hormonal characteristics.

Hmmmm..... Peter Tegen told me in 1992 that Ma's Chinese Army were Men posing as Women racing against Women and were all hermaphrodites. Funny how only 1-2 of those Chinese athletes ever raced outside of China.

They had the distinct advantage of a cheating federation backing them up at the Asian games with the International doping lab in Beijing.

We won't get duped again! This bunch of cheaters will fall hard Karma is coming and it is Instant, just like it was in 2009 in Berlin. If Caster thought this last year was hell, that was just purgatory.

she doesnt get congratulated by any of the actual females who just raced, seems to indicate a lack of respect to me. when i get beat i always give the guy a little hand shake or some sort of acknowledgement that he was better than me on that day.

kaitainen wrote:

as much as the caster semenya of last year appeared to clearly be over any sensible line for defining female for athletic purposes, the issue of line drawing is certainly rife with difficulty. there isn't a single world championships finalist who is not a genetic outlier. even with hard training and dedication, there is something extremely unique and special (in an athletic sense) about their dna.

You seem to be forgetting one thing here. Semenya has testicles. The other ladies that compete against her do not.

Seems like a VERY clear distinction to me.

Carnage on the track wrote:

You seem to be forgetting one thing here. Semenya has testicles. The other ladies that compete against her do not.

Seems like a VERY clear distinction to me.

so the line for you is testicles (would one testicle do it?). does that mean that your line must be the one adopted? why? would most people around the world, when confronted with a human being with a vagina and no penis, say that the person in question is male? or not female?

i'm not even saying i disagree with your drawing of the line. i just don't know why it must be the line.

and who do we test? world record breakers? gold medalists? all finalists?

semenya is the "easy" case and the IAAF can't even handle it properly.

I am so confused right now. Is this entire thread a troll or have I been grossly misinformed?!

rsbones wrote:

Then there is another division for women only. I figure, to be in that division, one needs to be 100% female, otherwise, compete in the open division.

then NOBODY would be allowed to compete in the women's division....

What does "100% female" mean?

There is a reason the IAAF cannot form a policy on this issue. There is no binary answer to this question.

It is amazing how it upsets the high school boys on this board, tho...

www.fund-king.com wrote:

What does "100% female" mean?

It means "not a guy."

You should probably be aware of this before you go out on dates.

They said she received a large ovation at the meet. Whats wrong with the spectators?!?! They're so happy to see a man run amongst women? What is there logic ????

their logic

Cummins comments to the media regarding Caster are disgraceful! "like running against a man!" She should be fine for unsportsmanlike conduct. Truly bring the sport into disrepute for a 1.59!!!!! Talk about being a sore loser - my god that's jealously in the worst form possible.