A sprinter or a distance runner?

a possible future in hockey.

That runner would probably be best off focusing on the 800m.

1500m/5000m runner

sorry, that didnt work the fist time.

Summary: You have good natural speed, but your best development would probably occur 800 and up.

I would say concentrating on the 800 and 1500 would be best in the short term. This will give you important racing skills and get you used to racing and working out with a high level of intensity. During the next few years it would be advisable to slowly increase your weekly mileage. I think at some point in the future, your best event would be the 5k o possibly even longer, but that would depend on your ability to handle mileage.

You should run 600 indoors.

At 800m/mile the miles still need to be run.

70 to 80 miles a week, at least.

The problem with giving the "at least 70-80 a week" advice is that this person has never run more than 40/week. It is going to take some time to acclimate to consistent higher mileage so as not to run into injury problems.

On the other hand, yes, to be successful at the 1500m distance I would say that 70-80 miles per week during a base phase is necessary. Of course during the racing portion of the season mileage does not necessarily need to be that high.

My advice, get a coach to help you individually. This is all conjecture unless someone can work with you on a consistent basis.

Of course he would need to be brought up gradually, but that's where he will need to get to.

I'd have to say more of a sprinter, but definitely one with some decent endurance. I think the best range for you or whoever to work on would be 400 possibly 800. That's just my opinion, seeing as how your 400 and below times are better than me but I've got you 800 and up. The 400's definitely your most impressive time, at least to me.

Are you more prone to get injured from running too far too fast or running too fast too fast?

I have the same question, and have many of the samr prs only on about 30-35mpw. 53, 203, 432, 1010. Any advice.

He'll never be very good at 400 or 800 meters. I bet he couldn't run faster than low 49s, or high 48s, which puts him as either a 1500m runner, with the potential to run 3:31, or as a 5000m (and up) runner with much more competetive potential.

It appears you have a future in irrelevant bullshit. Thanks for wasting my time.