I was reading joe's book and there is a table on page 152 that shows mileage for emerging marathoners. My question is what do you guys think of this schedule. I copied it exactly from his book. I was thinking about doing this but for track. What do you guys think?
50
70
60
80
70
100
80
120
90
120
90
70
70
70
Just assume I can handle the jumps, so leave out the you'll get injured parts. And I have been running about 50mpw all winter but want to get back to big miles again and thought this looks like an interesting plan to try. The most I have done is 120mpw so I know I can go that high. Thanks.
Why would you copy that or any plan written in a book? If you want to build up your mileage, go ahead but listen to your body and go at a level you can handle.
bump
where does one even get this book?
You used to be able to get them from the Adams State bookstore when you couldn't find them anywhere else. I haven't checked in a couple of years, but you might try calling there if your really want one.
That looks a lot like Deena did:
http://www.coolrunning.com/engine/2/2_1/the-anatomy-of-a-medal.shtml
jaguar1 wrote:
That looks a lot like Deena did:
http://www.coolrunning.com/engine/2/2_1/the-anatomy-of-a-medal.shtml
Yeah thats in the book and is for the more expirienced marathoners. I was just looking at this one its kinda of intermediate.
Also to get the book you send Joe a letter with your address. I can't find the page with his address. It used to be under a review of his book on amazon but it looks like its gone.
Still there.
Am an aspiring 'thon runner and found this. The issue w/the address and having the book sent to you is fixable as the review is still there.
Jose Vigil wrote:
50
70
60
80
70
100
80
120
90
120
90
70
70
70
Always found people planning out mileage weeks ahead of time as stupid. Listen to your body. Be consistent. Some weeks you'll run more. Other weeks not so much. Week of your goal race, cut a bit back on volume. Look at Bill Rodgers training log as a excellent example of what I'm talking about.
Never to late to respond wrote:
Jose Vigil wrote:
50
70
60
80
70
100
80
120
90
120
90
70
70
70
Always found people planning out mileage weeks ahead of time as stupid. Listen to your body. Be consistent. Some weeks you'll run more. Other weeks not so much. Week of your goal race, cut a bit back on volume. Look at Bill Rodgers training log as a excellent example of what I'm talking about.
agreed
Nothing wrong with making out a training plan. If you are feeling worn down you probably needed a recovery week a few weeeks prior. I see no harm with this as long as you are flexible and willing to adjust on the fly.
Nothingwrong wrote:
Nothing wrong with making out a training plan. If you are feeling worn down you probably needed a recovery week a few weeeks prior. I see no harm with this as long as you are flexible and willing to adjust on the fly.
No one should follow Vigil's training. It's just a book and a lot of story's he tells. I heard Vigil telling people five guys broke 4 minutes in the mile in the middle of a workout at practice (at 7500ft).
If you actually believe that , then you should follow his training I guess.
Colin Sahlman runs 1:45 and Nico Young runs 1:47 in the 800m tonight at the Desert Heat Classic
Molly Seidel Fails To Debut As An Ultra Runner After Running A Road Marathon The Week Before
Megan Keith (14:43) DESTROYS Parker Valby's 5000 PB in Shanghai
Hallowed sub-16 barrier finally falls - 3 teams led by Villanova's 15:51.91 do it at Penn Relays!!!
Need female opinions: I’m dating a woman that is very sexual with me in public. Any tips/insight?