Here's the situation. If I run, I won't be able to see my family as much because I'll be running.
Is this right? I mean I have responsibilities to these 'people' don't I? some of whom I helped bring into the world...so I quess I 'have' to be there. But I want to run really really badly.
Is it right to put myself first, before my 'family'.
Anyone who has a child is contributing to overpopulation.
We have a major overpopulation problem in the US.
Typical Letsrun Answer wrote:
Anyone who has a child is contributing to overpopulation.
We have a major overpopulation problem in the US.
Depends on the type of child. It appears we have an underpopulation problem of quality people.
if you want to be the best you can be, running has to come before everything.
why would you run? you should play basketball. greg oden gets girls like his mother.
Throw out your TV and you will regain all of the time "lost" to running.
You think maybe your family members can bike along side you from time to time? That's a way to get your run in and get some quality time with the family.
Your running and your ego should truimp everything. Put the little bastards out for adoption. You come first.
So they hate you for the rest of their lives and you end up in a nursing home alone and abandoned. You got that last run in.
I think it is a hypothetical family since he used several quotation marks around 'people' and 'family.' Thus, he is a troll. But seriously, you do not spend all day 24/7 running. There has to be some time when the kids are sleeping, at school, or taking a dump when you can get your run in.
Typical Letsrun Answer wrote:
Anyone who has a child is contributing to overpopulation.
We have a major overpopulation problem in the US.
A real Typical Letsrun Answer would be something like Rupp/Hall/Ritz/Webb/A.J./?? sucks, sack up, or troll.