Is it the shoe that costs $500 and has bad durability? Although honestly if it’s 250km you can get 6 marathons out of it, 3 years at 2 marathons / year, not bad if you are chasing gains.
Interesting. It looks like they are using that classic (Vaporfly shaped) spoon-shaped plate that Nike patented. I wonder if they decided it was just worth paying fees to Nike to use that?
A plate for an article of footwear having a sole structure includes an anterior-most point disposed in a forefoot region of the sole structure, a posterior-most point disposed closer to a heel region of the sole structure tha...
So normally around lunch time, I give Jonathan Gault a call to see what he's up to. He said he'd just gotten off the phone (or maybe it was a text exchange) with a shoe exec. The exec said that the reason why no one is gettin...
Wow, under 100g. Using the old rule of thumb of saving 2 seconds per mile per ounce of shoe (counting weight of one side, not doubling for left and right), that's 6-7 seconds per mile? just from the weight savings alone over other supershoes before you consider other refinements in foam/plate design since the OG Vaporfly.
Answering myself on a different device, the old rule of thumb was 1 second per ounce of shoe. That's rounded up from 0.83 second that I see Jack Daniels cited. Considering only the weight advantage and if energy return was assumed to be otherwise the same, the Vaporfly (190g) is 70ish seconds slower in a marathon, while the Alphafly 3 (218g) is 93ish seconds slower over a marathon. That absolutely made the difference that allowed for the first sub-2s.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.