US president posts twice today about executing his opponents.

this is noteworthy, no? wrote:

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/G6NTrQ9WgAEPug1.jp...

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/G6NEUsBX0AAt4lv.jp...

We're supposed to pretend this is normal?

dems are violent wrote:

You are leaving out context.

He is responding to congress critters who are envouraging military personnel to ignore and disobey orders.

A military can't be run effectively if everyone is their own commanding officer.

feeeeel better now wrote:

this is noteworthy, no? wrote:

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/G6NTrQ9WgAEPug1.jp...

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/G6NEUsBX0AAt4lv.jp...

We're supposed to pretend this is normal?

No, it's not note worthy.

Have you forgotten Obama's words?

Liberals are such sissy little girlies.

More context wrote:

dems are violent wrote:

You are leaving out context.

He is responding to congress critters who are envouraging military personnel to ignore and disobey orders.

A military can't be run effectively if everyone is their own commanding officer.

And you are also leaving out context, which you know. They are urging the military to disobey illegal orders to attack their own citizens.

dems are violent wrote:

You are leaving out context.

He is responding to congress critters who are envouraging military personnel to ignore and disobey orders.

A military can't be run effectively if everyone is their own commanding officer.

you sound really really dumb wrote:

feeeeel better now wrote:

No, it's not note worthy.

Have you forgotten Obama's words?

Liberals are such sissy little girlies.

Obama spoke a lot of words, what are you referring to? I'm guessing something you've made up in your mind and have become convinced of... aka delusion.

More context wrote:

And you are also leaving out context, which you know. They are urging the military to disobey illegal orders to attack their own citizens.

Sweaty old Steve wrote:

No, they were reminding military personnel that they swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and to disobey ILLEGAL orders. Military personnel who follow ILLEGAL orders are committing crimes and can and will be prosecuted.

dems are violent wrote:

More context wrote:

And you are also leaving out context, which you know. They are urging the military to disobey illegal orders to attack their own citizens.

Well, that assumes that illegal orders have or will be given.

It is not the place of military personnel to question their orders.

If a military officer (commissioned or non-com) gives an illegal order, that individual can be court martialed.

If a civilian commander (such as Secretary of War or POTUS) gives an illegal order, that individual can be removed and/or impeached.

If you simply don't like the orders the Commander in Chief issues, we have these things called elections every four years.

dems are violent wrote:

What are these illegal orders?

Is any order given by Trump illegal because "Orange Man Bad"?

Sweaty old Steve wrote:

dems are violent wrote:

Well, that assumes that illegal orders have or will be given.

It is not the place of military personnel to question their orders.

If a military officer (commissioned or non-com) gives an illegal order, that individual can be court martialed.

If a civilian commander (such as Secretary of War or POTUS) gives an illegal order, that individual can be removed and/or impeached.

If you simply don't like the orders the Commander in Chief issues, we have these things called elections every four years.

That excuse did not fly at Nuremberg trials.

feeeeel better now wrote:

You sound even dumber girlie man

dems are violent wrote:

So, Dems, answer me this:

Let's say Newscum becomes president on 1/20/2029.

Would you support military personnel ignoring his orders because they believe them to be illegal?