Maybe. But that record was set by a high reaponding juicer doped to his eyeballs (and protected, for the good of the sport of course). That’s why it’s taken the world decades to catch up.
Maybe. But that record was set by a high reaponding juicer doped to his eyeballs (and protected, for the good of the sport of course). That’s why it’s taken the world decades to catch up.
We do know that nobody would get protected now of course.
Maybe. But that record was set by a high reaponding juicer doped to his eyeballs (and protected, for the good of the sport of course). That’s why it’s taken the world decades to catch up.
Honest question: why would El G be protected but not Jakob (or some other runner capable in this era)?
Wouldn’t it be good for athletics to have an athlete breaking world records, and therefore someone worth “protecting”?
Maybe. But that record was set by a high reaponding juicer doped to his eyeballs (and protected, for the good of the sport of course). That’s why it’s taken the world decades to catch up.
Honest question: why would El G be protected but not Jakob (or some other runner capable in this era)?
Wouldn’t it be good for athletics to have an athlete breaking world records, and therefore someone worth “protecting”?
No EPO test during El G’s “peak”. Runners are now tested more often worldwide - with the exception of the East Africans. Let that settle in.
Interesting aside, before EPO the Kenyan 1500 record was always behind the US record, never mind other nations. Interesting indeed. Meanwhile, a certain Moroccan with amazing range came along. A Moroccan who later became a coach and lost a great job because he told at least one charge that drugs were the way to go. Or so we’re told.
Jakob is turning 25 in two months. Jakob’s window is closing. Maybe it just wasn’t meant to be.
Actually it's another of the many red flags concerning El G.
He ran that on 14th July (27 years ago today) with four more 1500m time trials to come at Monaco, Zurich, Brussels, and Berlin and no major championships to aim for that year.
After the race, he declared he would run 3:24 before the end of the season.
Of course he didn't. He ran his mile WR the following year.
In the winter of 1999/2000, his coach declared that they were training to run sub 3:24/3:40 and were confident he would do it.
He had had no injury problems, yet did not touch his WRs again.
The first testing for EPO came in 2000, although it was pretty ineffective (but did nab Bernard B-Sample Lagat in 2003).
El G did the job better than Morceli who did a better job than Richard Virenque who did a better job than Marco Pantani. I believe Ovett and Cram were clean but Coe didn't get toxoplasmosis by accident, Peter was doing experimental science on his son (ring a bell)
what a fun era
were you not entertained?
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Maybe. But that record was set by a high reaponding juicer doped to his eyeballs (and protected, for the good of the sport of course). That’s why it’s taken the world decades to catch up.
… or maybe the record was set by a superior runner.
The fact that this record is a day away from being 27 years old despite advances in tracks and shoe technology is bonkers.
You don’t think the longevity of the record means that that maybe the new shoes and tracks make a minimal difference.
Not at all. All other records, 2000, 3000, 2 mile, 5000, 10000, HM, Marathon all set in the supershoe era. I think El G was simply an outlier or he was doped or both. I think you also can't focus on ONE runner. Look at how many more guys are running 3:32 or better now.