The Trump administration approved a first of its kind waiver for Nebraska, allowing a ban on soda purchases through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, starting next year.
I’m a lib and I can back this 100%. there is good in the rfk movement, mixed in with a lot of bad.
But America’s obesity problem is an epidemic. I feel very privileged to be fit and in an environment where I am around healthy people and being active and eating healthy is the norm. Many in the US are not so lucky: don’t have good education about health, don’t have access to healthy food, and are getting taken advantage of by big food processors that make their food intentionally addictive.
If congress adds a work or volunteer requirement for SNAP benefits, can people dig ditches and then fill them back in? I propose starting a charity where volunteers sit in a chair to watch wet paint to make sure it's drying properly...
As long as they don't force kids to eat healthy food in schools like Michele Obama wanted...
I'm all for legislation like this.
LOL.
Yep
This is a good thing. Kennedy is a whack job but actually has done some good - restricting what SNAP recipients can buy, looking at food additives, etc.
If he does look at school lunches, as the Obama administration did, the MAGA sheep will be rejoicing and starting stupid threads here that have stupid acronyms like “MAHA.” BTW, in medical parlance, MAHA means microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, a condition that can be serious and/or fatal.
The notoriously oddball but actually pretty accurate surveyors at Public Policy Polling are out with another one of their headline-grabbing polls today, with questions set on "Food issues polarizing America" — you know, Chik-...
The ban is good but it's funny that "republicans" are now OK with the government telling people what they can and can't do. I hope none of them ever fly a "Don't Tread on Me" flag.
People consider me liberal (I'm moderate) but I agree with this.
I had a situation about 30 years ago when I was in grad school and I had a wife, two kids and a house. We were scraping by for about a year. I put together 98 cents to buy a half gallon of ice cream.
In front of me at the grocery store was a guy with food stamps and cash buying beer and junk food- candy, chips, etc.
I was mad. I could have probably gotten food stamps but we were able to do it on our own and we "sacrificed" junk food and alcohol.
The ban is good but it's funny that "republicans" are now OK with the government telling people what they can and can't do. I hope none of them ever fly a "Don't Tread on Me" flag.
I agree!
The persons receiving taxpayer funded benefits should be allowed to spend that money any way they want to.
If they want to spend it on smokes, vapes, or alcohol, then they should be allowed to.
Who are we to tell those people how to spend the money that we are giving them?
As long as they don't force kids to eat healthy food in schools like Michele Obama wanted...
I'm all for legislation like this.
LOL.
LOL, its the same thing. So wealthy people (98%) can eat unhealthy food but poor people have to have healthy eating legislated? I know why people feel this way, but it feels wrong to me. I get no cigs, alcohol etc... But soda at least has water and carbs. An occasional soda is not heroin. Let me eat what they want.
I don't begrudge those on food stamps for buying soda, their lives are already challenging enough without judgment from control-freak Republicans, who likely spend $20 on breakfast each day.
This isn't about promoting healthy eating, it's about demoralizing the working class. "Give up your minor luxuries and jump through our hoops poors!"
Why not impose restrictions on everyone? The truth is that if you're wealthy enough, they don't care about your choices.