Ryan Hall wrote:
It’s not a 2:04:58 day with my shoes. But with your shoes, it is.
I don't know, something about the quote rubs me the wrong way. On one hand, Hall is implying that conditions were very good the day he ran 2:04. And he's saying that conditions yesterday were tougher.
Plus, bringing up the shoes is fair game; they really do make a multiple minute difference. And even ignoring Boston 2011, Hall's career was really exceptional, better than Mantz or any current US marathoner.
On the other hand, Hall's comment goes beyond just saying that Mantz has advantages which he himself didn't have. He isn't just saying "I had some advantages in 2011, runners today have different ones, and they cancel out". He's saying that 2:04:58 would be impossible without the new shoes, but possible with them. In other words, if Mantz had run faster than 2:04:58, according to Hall, the only possible explanation would have been the shoes.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, and it was just an inspirational quip. What do you all think?