I talked about him never being anything special at 100m but could make it as a long sprinter talking 200/400,
Most white sprinters have more success at 200 and 400 than in a 100. They are better at sustained speed than explosive speed,
Please don't waste your time and mine trying to dispute that, I have done the work know what I;m talking about,
You’re wrong. You cannot prove from genetic evidence that white-skinned people can run the 200/400 better than the 100. Such evidence does not exist. All you can do is list the number of people of African descent who win, versus the number of white skinned people. This is not evidence, it is circumstantial. I might as well claim that blacks are less intelligent because so few run Fortune 500 companies. Ridiculous.
I talked about him never being anything special at 100m but could make it as a long sprinter talking 200/400,
Most white sprinters have more success at 200 and 400 than in a 100. They are better at sustained speed than explosive speed,
Please don't waste your time and mine trying to dispute that, I have done the work know what I;m talking about,
You’re wrong. You cannot prove from genetic evidence that white-skinned people can run the 200/400 better than the 100. Such evidence does not exist. All you can do is list the number of people of African descent who win, versus the number of white skinned people. This is not evidence, it is circumstantial. I might as well claim that blacks are less intelligent because so few run Fortune 500 companies. Ridiculous.
How about honors won, world rankings, Olympians, superior times?
Actually track results are data and findings can be drawn using statistical analysis methods, including those based on race. They do it all the time on test scores.
You’re wrong. You cannot prove from genetic evidence that white-skinned people can run the 200/400 better than the 100. Such evidence does not exist. All you can do is list the number of people of African descent who win, versus the number of white skinned people. This is not evidence, it is circumstantial. I might as well claim that blacks are less intelligent because so few run Fortune 500 companies. Ridiculous.
How about honors won, world rankings, Olympians, superior times?
Will that work to prove my point?
Of course it won’t prove your point. As I made clear, for your thesis to be proven true it will require genetic proof that white skinned people are better at 200/400 than at the 100. If you uncover that evidence, I will agree with you. But just listing names proves nothing.
As I said before, I could list countless white skinned people, but far fewer blacks, who run top corporations or have won Nobel Prizes. By your logic this would “prove” blacks are cognitively incapable. It would also be a very foolish argument.
But at the pro level he can squeeze into the competition better than the 1 and 2. Atleast right now, there 4 or 5 guys who are gonna be on top in the 1 and 2 at most meets. It may not be that way in a few years.
His youth may be an advantage to come back down to the 1 and 2 after a few ppl (you know who they are) retire.
I talked about him never being anything special at 100m but could make it as a long sprinter talking 200/400,
Most white sprinters have more success at 200 and 400 than in a 100. They are better at sustained speed than explosive speed,
Please don't waste your time and mine trying to dispute that, I have done the work know what I;m talking about,
You guys are very good at having explosive tempers and engaging in impulsive behaviors like stabbing people at track meets just because you feel like “Imma stab someone” like some murderous clown recently posted in his social media before making his dream come true.