Could this be the reason some black men are reluctant to support Kamala Harris. Many men, especially deeply religious men feel women shouldn’t even lead a church much less a country. Although they may come up with a variety of excuses, a large percentage of men(black and white) would never vote for a women to be POTUS. I’ve even heard some women say they could never vote for a woman for POTUS because men are meant to be leaders.
Could this be the reason some black men are reluctant to support Kamala Harris. Many men, especially deeply religious men feel women shouldn’t even lead a church much less a country. Although they may come up with a variety of excuses, a large percentage of men(black and white) would never vote for a women to be POTUS. I’ve even heard some women say they could never vote for a woman for POTUS because men are meant to be leaders.
No it would not be wrong. Being vehemently anti-government, I would rather there be no president. But if we are going to have one, I prefer it not be a woman. I love women and all, I just think they generally don't make the best of leaders. I gather a lot of men think this, including black men, but are too afraid to say.
No it would not be wrong. Being vehemently anti-government, I would rather there be no president. But if we are going to have one, I prefer it not be a woman. I love women and all, I just think they generally don't make the best of leaders. I gather a lot of men think this, including black men, but are too afraid to say.
I understand the general thinking and mindset that comes to this conclusion and would agree that a lot men think like this, but I'd love to see just pure numbers behind male vs female leadership, or how confident you'd be in betting money on being able to reliable distinguish between male vs female leadership. I don't think you'd bet a dollar beyond what you'd consider "play money."
TBH, if all I could vote on was male vs female leadership, I'd probably lean towards female. What about the power hungry males whose egos get in the way and devolve to dictatorial behavior?
No it would not be wrong. Being vehemently anti-government, I would rather there be no president. But if we are going to have one, I prefer it not be a woman. I love women and all, I just think they generally don't make the best of leaders. I gather a lot of men think this, including black men, but are too afraid to say.
I understand the general thinking and mindset that comes to this conclusion and would agree that a lot men think like this, but I'd love to see just pure numbers behind male vs female leadership, or how confident you'd be in betting money on being able to reliable distinguish between male vs female leadership. I don't think you'd bet a dollar beyond what you'd consider "play money."
TBH, if all I could vote on was male vs female leadership, I'd probably lean towards female. What about the power hungry males whose egos get in the way and devolve to dictatorial behavior?
You may in fact be correct about distinguishing between male and female leadership, though I will admit probably a lot of it is symbolic. Much like a woman on the world stage, a football team shouldn't make their kicker a captain and send him out for the coin toss.
Could this be the reason some black men are reluctant to support Kamala Harris. Many men, especially deeply religious men feel women shouldn’t even lead a church much less a country. Although they may come up with a variety of excuses, a large percentage of men(black and white) would never vote for a women to be POTUS. I’ve even heard some women say they could never vote for a woman for POTUS because men are meant to be leaders.
You clearly don't know a damn thing about black people. 96% of all black men voted for Hillary and a higher percentage will be voting for Harris.
Could this be the reason some black men are reluctant to support Kamala Harris. Many men, especially deeply religious men feel women shouldn’t even lead a church much less a country. Although they may come up with a variety of excuses, a large percentage of men(black and white) would never vote for a women to be POTUS. I’ve even heard some women say they could never vote for a woman for POTUS because men are meant to be leaders.
No it would not be wrong. Being vehemently anti-government, I would rather there be no president. But if we are going to have one, I prefer it not be a woman. I love women and all, I just think they generally don't make the best of leaders. I gather a lot of men think this, including black men, but are too afraid to say.
SMH...numerous nation's have had a female lead the executive branch. The United States seems to always be last among the world when it comes putting to rest dumb ass beliefs that white men need to be in charge of everything. When they had affirmative action for themselves for 450 years...all they did was steal, rape and murder and discriminate still to this very day.
White Male Fragility.....America's ongoing sickness.
No it would not be wrong. Being vehemently anti-government, I would rather there be no president. But if we are going to have one, I prefer it not be a woman. I love women and all, I just think they generally don't make the best of leaders. I gather a lot of men think this, including black men, but are too afraid to say.
SMH...numerous nation's have had a female lead the executive branch. The United States seems to always be last among the world when it comes putting to rest dumb ass beliefs that white men need to be in charge of everything. When they had affirmative action for themselves for 450 years...all they did was steal, rape and murder and discriminate still to this very day.
White Male Fragility.....America's ongoing sickness.
Apparently I'm making you cry on multiple threads😉
Before 1920 Women could not vote, much less Run for President, I heard one of the reasons given is Women have too much empathy to be a leader, but Current Women in politics seem to be for constant wars, Nicki Haley supposedly even profits from wars by way of the Military Industry complex, Harris will keep us busy in wars or proxy wars as well so there is no truth whatsoever that Women have more empathy then Men, so I am okay with them running for President or any office. I will vote for Trump, but I expect Kamala Harris to win, she has the Middle Class, The Women (Over 50 % of the Voters)The LGBT groups about 30-40 % of The American people are LGBTQ, The only group Trump is Winning is White Men, I don't see any way Trump wins.
The LGBT groups about 30-40 % of The American people are LGBTQ. That’s both of us You and Me Pal and The whole goddamn neighborhood association even Larry. God Bless.
I understand the general thinking and mindset that comes to this conclusion and would agree that a lot men think like this, but I'd love to see just pure numbers behind male vs female leadership, or how confident you'd be in betting money on being able to reliable distinguish between male vs female leadership. I don't think you'd bet a dollar beyond what you'd consider "play money."
TBH, if all I could vote on was male vs female leadership, I'd probably lean towards female. What about the power hungry males whose egos get in the way and devolve to dictatorial behavior?
You may in fact be correct about distinguishing between male and female leadership, though I will admit probably a lot of it is symbolic. Much like a woman on the world stage, a football team shouldn't make their kicker a captain and send him out for the coin toss.
Why, exactly? I'm so confused. Is the coin toss an important part of the game? Are some players better at the coin toss? I think this is exactly why it's fine to vote for Harris. The president doesn't have actually take the hits, but they do need to be capable of careful preparation and accuracy. Harris will do the work, listen, and try to get it right. Trump will decide what to do based on who compliments him that day or whether or not he has had lunch. And he has never criticized Putin. Not once. Isn't that weird?