21 min flat, 5 months off of an acl tear. Have to admit I’m impressed, not bad for a 40 year old hobbyjogger
-
9221
-
Respectable time wrote:
21 min flat, 5 months off of an acl tear. Have to admit I’m impressed, not bad for a 40 year old hobbyjogger
Man 40 is not that old. 5 months is a long time.
6439 -
Respectable time wrote:
21 min flat, 5 months off of an acl tear. Have to admit I’m impressed, not bad for a 40 year old hobbyjogger
Yes, impressive. He’s also an MMA fighter and possesses visible abs to show off. Not bad for a billionaire hundred+ times over running a trillion dollar company.
2027 -
I'd like to see Derek with M.I. look into this. Yes, 21:02 only translates into a 63.87% age grading but 5 months after surgery? 6:45 pace seems fishy.
1127 -
InvestigateThis wrote:
I'd like to see Derek with M.I. look into this. Yes, 21:02 only translates into a 63.87% age grading but 5 months after surgery? 6:45 pace seems fishy.
They call him Mark Juicerberg.
His little son also ran. America's next big distance running hope? Imagine the top tier coaching Zuckerberg could pay for.
645 -
ejsnsnz wrote:
InvestigateThis wrote:
I'd like to see Derek with M.I. look into this. Yes, 21:02 only translates into a 63.87% age grading but 5 months after surgery? 6:45 pace seems fishy.
They call him Mark Juicerberg.
His little son also ran. America's next big distance running hope? Imagine the top tier coaching Zuckerberg could pay for.
Ah, doping. That would explain it.
326 -
Results link? Certified course?
33 -
Daughter
51 -
Bio Duder wrote:
Results link? Certified course?
He posted a picture of his watch so likely accurate course
310 -
40 years <5 months? Please.
12 -
Can we stop pretending 40 is old? Dudes are running 2:04 or faster at this age now.
549 -
He ran 19:34 51 weeks ago:
373 -
dasdfsad wrote:
Can we stop pretending 40 is old? Dudes are running 2:04 or faster at this age now.
No, we can’t stop. They still can’t run 2:04, which is our arbitrary cutoff in response to yours.
68 -
I could understand if he was running low 18s or mid 17's, then I'd say yeah it's pretty impressive. For a hobbyjogger billionaire that would be cool. But 21 mins?? We are reaching a bit here.
3815 -
dasdfsad wrote:
Can we stop pretending 40 is old? Dudes are running 2:04 or faster at this age now.
There's one dude that's done it twice. Doesn't count as "dudes".
340 -
I am not impressed at all by someone all out racing a 5k at a normal runner's easy pace
2329 -
annoyed track fan wrote:
I am not impressed at all by someone all out racing a 5k at a normal runner's easy pace
What do you think the word normal means? Zuck would destroy most normal runners that are attending park runs for example.
503 -
John Wesley Harding wrote:
He ran 19:34 51 weeks ago:
Last year, and at that time he said he barely runs anymore. He must have become bored with running.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted. Reason provided: Added content17 -
Respectable time wrote:
21 min flat, 5 months off of an acl tear. Have to admit I’m impressed, not bad for a 40 year old hobbyjogger
He is a poser and a bad person. I am not saying this because of his financial status I am saying this because of how he treats people.
205 -
feynman wrote:
dasdfsad wrote:
Can we stop pretending 40 is old? Dudes are running 2:04 or faster at this age now.
There's one dude that's done it twice. Doesn't count as "dudes".
Kipchoge and Bekele. I personally don't believe Kipchoge's age is accurate.
Let's move the needle though - there are 40 olds running sub 2:30 for the marathon.
My point still stands - 40 is not old. 21 minutes is not fast.
159
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.