We’ve seen a new era in distance running for non African born athletes jakob, Kerr, Nico, fisher ect.
this has definitely begun to show it’s not about “genetics”
what’s stopping us from catching up in the sprints? Is it a psychological barrier???
It is about genetics. No quotation marks necessary: genetics are a real thing.
I get what you’re saying but the whole East African dominance was majority cultural influence along with doping and that created a narrative that they had some inherent genetic adaptations which we can see now has been disproved. The same should be able to be articulated in sprints, Afro Caribbean, and west African descent people also have this sprinting genetic stereotype which imo isn’t true
It is about genetics. No quotation marks necessary: genetics are a real thing.
I get what you’re saying but the whole East African dominance was majority cultural influence along with doping and that created a narrative that they had some inherent genetic adaptations which we can see now has been disproved. The same should be able to be articulated in sprints, Afro Caribbean, and west African descent people also have this sprinting genetic stereotype which imo isn’t true
Running is more talent base than long distance running so it might take some time.
It is about genetics. No quotation marks necessary: genetics are a real thing.
I get what you’re saying but the whole East African dominance was majority cultural influence along with doping and that created a narrative that they had some inherent genetic adaptations which we can see now has been disproved. The same should be able to be articulated in sprints, Afro Caribbean, and west African descent people also have this sprinting genetic stereotype which imo isn’t true
The apparent West African talent for 'explosive' athletic ability has carried over to dozens of sports. The supposed 'natural born runner' genes of the East African has not crossed over into any other sport. There have been a couple of promising East African cyclists recently, but that is likely due to professional teams scouting East Africa - i.e. self-fulfilling. Imagine if East African soccer players could run around the pitch significantly more than other ethnicities without getting tired. But they can't.
Also,.haven't they found a 'speed gene' that West Africans possess to a greater frequency? Despite many efforts, no 'special genes' have been found among East Africans to explain their success.
No doubt the 'myth' of West African descent having a greater talent for sprinting is at least to an extent self-fulfilling. But in the case of East Africans and distance running its been entirely disproven (or proven to be a myth).
And yes, saying that 'blacks can run faster' opens the door to racists saying 'whites are more intelligent'.
From 1932 to 1964, 100m dash was multi-ethnic with participants from all over the world.
N Young & Fisher have no world records and no international medals.
Dominate? That's a strong word. From 1960 Olympics through most recent Olympic, men and women from all over the world appear to have legit medal hopes, 200m to 5000m.
From 1932 to 1964, 100m dash was multi-ethnic with participants from all over the world.
N Young & Fisher have no world records and no international medals.
Dominate? That's a strong word. From 1960 Olympics through most recent Olympic, men and women from all over the world appear to have legit medal hopes, 200m to 5000m.
When was the last time a Non Afro man/Lady won a 100m or 200m??
I get what you’re saying but the whole East African dominance was majority cultural influence along with doping and that created a narrative that they had some inherent genetic adaptations which we can see now has been disproved. The same should be able to be articulated in sprints, Afro Caribbean, and west African descent people also have this sprinting genetic stereotype which imo isn’t true
The apparent West African talent for 'explosive' athletic ability has carried over to dozens of sports. The supposed 'natural born runner' genes of the East African has not crossed over into any other sport. There have been a couple of promising East African cyclists recently, but that is likely due to professional teams scouting East Africa - i.e. self-fulfilling. Imagine if East African soccer players could run around the pitch significantly more than other ethnicities without getting tired. But they can't.
Also,.haven't they found a 'speed gene' that West Africans possess to a greater frequency? Despite many efforts, no 'special genes' have been found among East Africans to explain their success.
No doubt the 'myth' of West African descent having a greater talent for sprinting is at least to an extent self-fulfilling. But in the case of East Africans and distance running its been entirely disproven (or proven to be a myth).
And yes, saying that 'blacks can run faster' opens the door to racists saying 'whites are more intelligent'.
Cycling takes much more resources and training and actually makes Africans lose the mechanical advantage that they have. Also the gene is called Actn 3 which 99% of Nigerians have…. The kicker is that 99% and 80% of Kenyans and Ethiopian have these gene 🧬. This a much higher frequency than Caucasian population along with the fact that Most kalejin and Oromo populations respond to altitude much better than other ethnic groups is another factor. African tends to have better heat dissipation, Denser and finer bones, Longer tendons which all contribute to better running economy and efficiency at faster speeds. Caucasian dominant at a plethora of sports that on average their body composition suits more, strong man, weightlifting, Rowing, Cycling ect. My question to you coevett is would put your money on 500 Caucasian kids at random vs 500 East African at random ( Kenyan/Ethiopian/South Sudan/Somali) give them the same resources and training and which group would outperform the other? I’m talking the EA.
Enjoy this recent study on Israeli Ethiopians 2021
“The dominance of Ethiopian origin Israeli long-distance runners is associated not only with endurance genetic polymorphisms but also with polymorphisms of enhanced speed performance (ACTN3 RR), improved lactate clearance (MCT1 AA), and better recovery capabilities (low IL-6-174C”
The apparent West African talent for 'explosive' athletic ability has carried over to dozens of sports. The supposed 'natural born runner' genes of the East African has not crossed over into any other sport. There have been a couple of promising East African cyclists recently, but that is likely due to professional teams scouting East Africa - i.e. self-fulfilling. Imagine if East African soccer players could run around the pitch significantly more than other ethnicities without getting tired. But they can't.
Also,.haven't they found a 'speed gene' that West Africans possess to a greater frequency? Despite many efforts, no 'special genes' have been found among East Africans to explain their success.
No doubt the 'myth' of West African descent having a greater talent for sprinting is at least to an extent self-fulfilling. But in the case of East Africans and distance running its been entirely disproven (or proven to be a myth).
And yes, saying that 'blacks can run faster' opens the door to racists saying 'whites are more intelligent'.
Cycling takes much more resources and training and actually makes Africans lose the mechanical advantage that they have. Also the gene is called Actn 3 which 99% of Nigerians have…. The kicker is that 99% and 80% of Kenyans and Ethiopian have these gene 🧬. This a much higher frequency than Caucasian population along with the fact that Most kalejin and Oromo populations respond to altitude much better than other ethnic groups is another factor. African tends to have better heat dissipation, Denser and finer bones, Longer tendons which all contribute to better running economy and efficiency at faster speeds. Caucasian dominant at a plethora of sports that on average their body composition suits more, strong man, weightlifting, Rowing, Cycling ect. My question to you coevett is would put your money on 500 Caucasian kids at random vs 500 East African at random ( Kenyan/Ethiopian/South Sudan/Somali) give them the same resources and training and which group would outperform the other? I’m talking the EA.
Enjoy this recent study on Israeli Ethiopians 2021
“The dominance of Ethiopian origin Israeli long-distance runners is associated not only with endurance genetic polymorphisms but also with polymorphisms of enhanced speed performance (ACTN3 RR), improved lactate clearance (MCT1 AA), and better recovery capabilities (low IL-6-174C”
Kenyan don’t have high level of ACTN gene where did you get that from?
From 1932 to 1964, 100m dash was multi-ethnic with participants from all over the world.
N Young & Fisher have no world records and no international medals.
Dominate? That's a strong word. From 1960 Olympics through most recent Olympic, men and women from all over the world appear to have legit medal hopes, 200m to 5000m.
Including 1992 Olympic, more racial diversity, men 200m than men 10000m, medal stand.
Unless steroid massages, does Rupp earn 10000m Olympic medal?
It is about genetics. No quotation marks necessary: genetics are a real thing.
No, all races are the same. Saying that 1 race is faster or more athletic is like saying that 1 race is more intelligent.
Sure seems that way, It sure seems some groups dominate some things in spite of the numbers astronically against them, Example 70-80 percent of Americans are fat, but it sure seems like Fat People NEVER make The USA Olympic Team in the Marathon, There are more Weak Americans Than Strong Americans, yet Weak people NEVER make The USA Weightlifting Team, There are More People with poor coordination than great Coordination, Yet Most people making The Olympic Gymnastics Teams are Coordinated.
Ibram X Khendi says when people get different results, then the ONLY EXPLANATION must be Racism, So if you are runnin A Marathon this Weekend and for whatever reason you do not run 2:00.35 then that means you are CLEARLY A Victim of Racism.
Personally I like Khendi's theory, so if Einstien was more Brilliant than me I am a Victim of Racism, If I decide to play Hocket and I am not as good as Wayne Gretzky in his prime, Then I am a victim of Racism. If you are not at least as good as anyone in the History of the World, It is because you are a Victim of racism, That is the ONLY EXPANATION Right? LOL
I get what you’re saying but the whole East African dominance was majority cultural influence along with doping and that created a narrative that they had some inherent genetic adaptations which we can see now has been disproved. The same should be able to be articulated in sprints, Afro Caribbean, and west African descent people also have this sprinting genetic stereotype which imo isn’t true
The apparent West African talent for 'explosive' athletic ability has carried over to dozens of sports. The supposed 'natural born runner' genes of the East African has not crossed over into any other sport. There have been a couple of promising East African cyclists recently, but that is likely due to professional teams scouting East Africa - i.e. self-fulfilling. Imagine if East African soccer players could run around the pitch significantly more than other ethnicities without getting tired. But they can't.
Also,.haven't they found a 'speed gene' that West Africans possess to a greater frequency? Despite many efforts, no 'special genes' have been found among East Africans to explain their success.
No doubt the 'myth' of West African descent having a greater talent for sprinting is at least to an extent self-fulfilling. But in the case of East Africans and distance running its been entirely disproven (or proven to be a myth).
And yes, saying that 'blacks can run faster' opens the door to racists saying 'whites are more intelligent'.
There's a much simpler explanation. Running is basically a time trial. You run 30-120min as fast as you can. Cycling is draft dominant and because of that the most important metric is 1-5min power. Aside from sprint/climb races, most bike racers win because of their ability to "break the elastic" with their ~3min power.
If we revise the genetic component to select for 60+min running ability vs 3min cycling ability then it's not hard to explain. Rift Valley people have pretty clear morphology and tested physio differences, combined with a wholesale wanting to compete in the sport celebrated in that community.
Rift Valley people have not proven themselves to be superior 3mim power output cyclists. They have again and again proven to be superior 60+min running athletes. That could be for 100 different reasons, but the reasons matter less than the outcome.
My theory was IT VARIES BY INDIVIDUAL, but Khendi opened my eyes that eveyone is equal to the greatest ever to do whatever and Racism is the ONLY reason everything is not totally equal, if we can eliminate racism, every sporting competition would end up in a Draw/Tied
On other threads I have offered a gene pool theory. Read username. From 1932 to 1964, there was not one ethnic or racial group earning sprint medals, Olympics. From 1932, men from various ethnic and racial groups earned 100m dash Olympic medals, 10.2 or 10.3.[Low 10.xx 100m on cinder with heavy leather shoes was fast.] I have stated WW2 altered Eurasian gene pool due to millions of Eurasian infantrymen deaths. I haven't see a better theory. Did Black male genes mutate, post-1960? Explain 1972 Olympic then. I rarely read on here: Ovett had a hollow victory, 800m. No James Robinson, no Mike Boit, no Don Paige, no unknown young Kenyan, etc. I never read on here: Coe had a hollow victory, 1500m. No Steve Scott, no Thomas Wessinghage, no Wilson Waigwa, no unknown Kenyan, etc. Coe and Ovett lined up and beat who showed up. Same for Allan Wells. Allan Wells, Olympic 100m gold, 1980.
The apparent West African talent for 'explosive' athletic ability has carried over to dozens of sports. The supposed 'natural born runner' genes of the East African has not crossed over into any other sport. There have been a couple of promising East African cyclists recently, but that is likely due to professional teams scouting East Africa - i.e. self-fulfilling. Imagine if East African soccer players could run around the pitch significantly more than other ethnicities without getting tired. But they can't.
Also,.haven't they found a 'speed gene' that West Africans possess to a greater frequency? Despite many efforts, no 'special genes' have been found among East Africans to explain their success.
No doubt the 'myth' of West African descent having a greater talent for sprinting is at least to an extent self-fulfilling. But in the case of East Africans and distance running its been entirely disproven (or proven to be a myth).
And yes, saying that 'blacks can run faster' opens the door to racists saying 'whites are more intelligent'.
Cycling takes much more resources and training and actually makes Africans lose the mechanical advantage that they have. Also the gene is called Actn 3 which 99% of Nigerians have…. The kicker is that 99% and 80% of Kenyans and Ethiopian have these gene 🧬. This a much higher frequency than Caucasian population along with the fact that Most kalejin and Oromo populations respond to altitude much better than other ethnic groups is another factor. African tends to have better heat dissipation, Denser and finer bones, Longer tendons which all contribute to better running economy and efficiency at faster speeds. Caucasian dominant at a plethora of sports that on average their body composition suits more, strong man, weightlifting, Rowing, Cycling ect. My question to you coevett is would put your money on 500 Caucasian kids at random vs 500 East African at random ( Kenyan/Ethiopian/South Sudan/Somali) give them the same resources and training and which group would outperform the other? I’m talking the EA.
Enjoy this recent study on Israeli Ethiopians 2021
“The dominance of Ethiopian origin Israeli long-distance runners is associated not only with endurance genetic polymorphisms but also with polymorphisms of enhanced speed performance (ACTN3 RR), improved lactate clearance (MCT1 AA), and better recovery capabilities (low IL-6-174C”
On other threads I have offered a gene pool theory. Read username. From 1932 to 1964, there was not one ethnic or racial group earning sprint medals, Olympics. From 1932, men from various ethnic and racial groups earned 100m dash Olympic medals, 10.2 or 10.3.[Low 10.xx 100m on cinder with heavy leather shoes was fast.] I have stated WW2 altered Eurasian gene pool due to millions of Eurasian infantrymen deaths. I haven't see a better theory. Did Black male genes mutate, post-1960? Explain 1972 Olympic then. I rarely read on here: Ovett had a hollow victory, 800m. No James Robinson, no Mike Boit, no Don Paige, no unknown young Kenyan, etc. I never read on here: Coe had a hollow victory, 1500m. No Steve Scott, no Thomas Wessinghage, no Wilson Waigwa, no unknown Kenyan, etc. Coe and Ovett lined up and beat who showed up. Same for Allan Wells. Allan Wells, Olympic 100m gold, 1980.
Africa has been in a famine for how long ? East Africa is probably about 200 million people the rest of the world is like 50x that bro. No matter how many men died in WW they always still outnumber EA