With current technology? Sub-3:30?
With current technology? Sub-3:30?
How about Ronald Bannister?
Maybe a 1400 meter race.
....well you can call me Robert, you can call me Ronald, .....
kmaclam wrote:
....well you can call me Robert, you can call me Ronald, .....
Where does Roger Cannister store his track spikes?
It depends on his case load and whether or not he has to race in a horsehair wig.
Barrister Problems wrote:
It depends on his case load and whether or not he has to race in a horsehair wig.
Judging by your response, do you think he's guilty of not trying enough?
Reg Bannister
At least sub-4:00.
Sheikh Yabouti wrote:
With current technology? Sub-3:30?
I don't think any amount of tech will help him now. (Unless you count a flashlight and a shovel.)
.....assuming (exhuming?) Roger Bannister, that is.
hughjh wrote:
How about Ronald Bannister?
How about Rojo Basturd?
I could see Robbie Bandrews going sub-4
Roger Bannister, with today's shoes and today's tracks would race 1 mile in 3:47.xx to 3:52.xx range. Reminder. No Olympic medal. Reminder. 3:43.xx 1500m is inferior to 3:58.xx 1 mile. His 1500m today would also be inferior. He would not race sub-3:32 1500m.
Your title and your post don\'t match. wrote:
Roger Bannister, with today's shoes and today's tracks would race 1 mile in 3:47.xx to 3:52.xx range. Reminder. No Olympic medal. Reminder. 3:43.xx 1500m is inferior to 3:58.xx 1 mile. His 1500m today would also be inferior. He would not race sub-3:32 1500m.
But would the doctor be faster than the barrister?
I believe its "Sir" Roberto Bannistero
F*ck I can't stop laughing
Sheikh Yabouti wrote:
With current technology? Sub-3:30?
Ron-Bert Banmaster would run 4:06 most likely
1 post was removed from this page.