Biden signs executive order on women's health research, but not for men

Of course, you are trolling, as good little incels do. But you clearly do not know how to read, and this is not a man v. women issue-nearly all health research funding goes to study conditions without parsing how men or women respond. A cardiovascular study will enter both men and women and then, with protocol set, will provide the same dose to both sexes. But what if the sexes do not respond the same? How would you know unless you studied it? And women often have unique health problems ones that traditionally have not received the kind of funding general health issues have- except these are general health issues as well, just limited to one sec. Now, you could do factor analysis or sensitivity analysis, but you would be working with smaller populations so would have less power. All this is well known by everyone except, apparently, you. But your post really has nothing to do with reality; it is just more idiocy on letsrun by stupid little college kids with nothing to do but stir the pot. "You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!"

Your writing is so bad lol. Uneducated Dims….

Learn how to use semi colon properly. Then apostrophes. It’s also sect* not sec lol.

President = woke idiot

This is woke that is woke everything I don’t like is woke.

actually it was my understanding historically most research was done on men as women were perceived as hormonal/time of month which might skew results. it's only in recent decades it dawned on folks that studying only men meant they didn't understand how, say, a drug impacted women differently, or needed to be dosed different at lower weights.

anyhow, it's funny listening to white conservative men act like they are history's afterthought rather than unusually empowered relative to anyone else and desperately trying to hold on in the guise of how they are so mistreated.

i mean, both presidential candidates are white men. you have it so hard.

How binding is an executive order?

Does any rigorous legal process punish those who contradict it?

The Republican party has no courage or ethics and are lead by a conman/criminal so you can't vote Republican.

However you make an excellent point. James Carville (sp) made that same point. The Democrats are losing the male vote and seem not to care.

^ This! Yes, historically most studies and data were generated using male only subjects, and the outcomes were assumed to be the same for women. Which in many areas they are not. Including cardiology. It is important to fund studies where the aim is specific to the female population so we better understand how disease/ health issues can be proper managed and treated for this gender.

Let me get this straight. You think the NIH in 2024, with its $50 billion budget, doesn't know that drugs need to be dosed differently at different weights?

but not for men?

Why not men?

Why not solve problems today instead of re-solve already-solved problems from 1950?

Today, men's health is under-funded, not women's, but no politician is allowed to say that truth.