She's that good.
She's that good.
In terms of average pace or equivalent performance? The courses were similar enough that I think equivalent performance would actually be a pretty good metric.
229 of the 244 male finishers came through the 6K split faster than any of the women ... while running a 10K.
Parker is very good and ran a great race, but this assertion is not true.
Why do people post things that are so obviously false? Don't they have anything better to do with their time?
There are far better threads than this one that contain false doping allegations, left-wing propaganda, alt-right conspiracies, sexless marriages, and my 400k salary.
Please someone delete this garbage take.
But, to me, she looks better than all of them, and nearly all or all of the women, too.
Strangely enough she may have been right there with Stanford’s Zane Bergen at the finish (226th/236 finishers, 32:44).
Stanford yet again ruining a talented athlete
It's because they aren't cross-training and running only twice a week.
Found the Parker fan boy.
You guy's have got to calm down about this womon. She's very good and run's well in the NCAA. But she is a 23year old with a PR of 15:20 for 5000 meters. She has alot of worlk to do to just place in any Diamond League race.
WTF are you talking about?
Who could disagree with the impossible to measure metric of “could have”
Let alone qualify for any diamond league. Her cross country performances are more impressive than her track. With some added strength, Valby and Touhy will be meters behind Wiley in their own specialty--the 5000 m.
The combination of Epo and steroids is a hell of a drug. Just look what they did for Houlihan.
She is 21. She is a world ahead of where Monson and Schweizer were at this age.
What is a womon?
I don’t think she’s 23 btw. She graduated high school in 2020.
No one seems to know how old she is. Well except for the scam artists that took her to the cleaners. They learned everything. Anyway I will show myself out.
PS-I think she is 21.
This post was removed.