It is the nature of the sport and any clean track or road athlete should expect it and wear the accusations as a traditional badge of honor.
It is the nature of the sport and any clean track or road athlete should expect it and wear the accusations as a traditional badge of honor.
d'accord
The absurd evolution of distance running performances is killing the sport for me. Sure, shoes gave a boost. But even if you take shoes out of the equation, distance running is at least 20-30 years missing the big bang that hit cycling in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Its not even like the sport is getting more professional. There may be the rare occasion of training groups like the NN running team with a certain amount of infrastructure and more thorough planning in nutrition and training, but in its fundamentals its the same same thing as ever. Hard working young athletes from Africa getting shipped to Europe by the same managers. Lots of them with questionable records and a bad reputation.
Hearing a semi-public rant by the former head coach of a pretty big european nation on the doping situation in Africa (basically saying that its more than widespread...) finally killed it for me. The sport is killing itself because no one wants and can relate to these performances. Especially not us amateur runners, because there is a variable more in the equation than just commitment and hard work, which is killing the dreams you have during a scenic morning run in the woods.
Dunno. Always with the whataboutism.
Eilish being hypocritical isn't relevant here.
Paula's doping status has no bearing on this particular obvious cheat.
I think she belongs here on the Savage board.
I remember lisa,years ago,complaining about chinese dopers,and women with facial hair in long distance,but maybe she protesteth too much.Who knows what she was on?
If YOU want to clean up the doping problem since you, Jeff ( along with Astro, Armstronglivs, Trollism, etc.) claim that everyone is doping, then put your money where your mouth is - pay for it out of your own pocket. That would mean testing of ALL athletes twice a day every day of the year - sounds expensive. Because the only thing I get out of all the complaining is that the system as it stands doesn't work. So pay for a more inclusive one.
I don't accuse those who haven't tested positive (regardless of the performance level) as I don't have access to the information that proves that anyone has been doping, so I have to wait/rely on the doping agencies to do their work (even if I think they get it wrong sometimes as no system is infallible) - I presume that you people do have access to this information?! Of course I do have suspicions that SOME people are doping, but I generally keep it to myself as anything else is unfair to innocent athletes. I certainly wouldn't want anyone accusing me without some evidence/proof, so why would I do that to others?
just a bunch of complainers wrote:
If YOU want to clean up the doping problem since you, Jeff ( along with Astro, Armstronglivs, Trollism, etc.) claim that everyone is doping, then put your money where your mouth is - pay for it out of your own pocket. That would mean testing of ALL athletes twice a day every day of the year - sounds expensive. Because the only thing I get out of all the complaining is that the system as it stands doesn't work. So pay for a more inclusive one.
I don't accuse those who haven't tested positive (regardless of the performance level) as I don't have access to the information that proves that anyone has been doping, so I have to wait/rely on the doping agencies to do their work (even if I think they get it wrong sometimes as no system is infallible) - I presume that you people do have access to this information?! Of course I do have suspicions that SOME people are doping, but I generally keep it to myself as anything else is unfair to innocent athletes. I certainly wouldn't want anyone accusing me without some evidence/proof, so why would I do that to others?
So we should pay to fix a problem caused by others? That isn't what I would call persuasive. Personally, I doubt it can be fixed now - doping is too far ahead in the game. Testing catches very few.
just a bunch of complainers wrote:
If YOU want to clean up the doping problem since you, Jeff ( along with Astro, Armstronglivs, Trollism, etc.) claim that everyone is doping, then put your money where your mouth is - pay for it out of your own pocket. That would mean testing of ALL athletes twice a day every day of the year - sounds expensive. Because the only thing I get out of all the complaining is that the system as it stands doesn't work. So pay for a more inclusive one.
I don't accuse those who haven't tested positive (regardless of the performance level) as I don't have access to the information that proves that anyone has been doping, so I have to wait/rely on the doping agencies to do their work (even if I think they get it wrong sometimes as no system is infallible) - I presume that you people do have access to this information?! Of course I do have suspicions that SOME people are doping, but I generally keep it to myself as anything else is unfair to innocent athletes. I certainly wouldn't want anyone accusing me without some evidence/proof, so why would I do that to others?
Literally everyone at top level in most sports are doping.Thats not complaining.Thats fact.Sport wouldnt be sport without drugs.
Is a 25K race a half ultra?
Parker Valby post 5k interview... Worst of all time? Are Parker Valby interviews always cringe?
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Start Lists for the Men's and Women's Mile/1500 at Pre are up
MSU men > NAU by 1 point even though Nico Young and Colin Sahlman tripled!!
What is the worst insult anyone gave you about your running ability and how did you respond?