Scumbag getting what he deserves. Not eligible for parole for 30 years.
That 70's Show' actor Masterson sentenced to 30 years to life in prison for raping two women.
-
397
-
The women said Masterson drugged and raped them in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003 at his house in the Hollywood Hills.
No more statute of limitations?
Seems there is.
How does the law get around the law (statute of limitations) to get indictments and convictions?
793 -
Newname wrote:
The women said Masterson drugged and raped them in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003 at his house in the Hollywood Hills.
No more statute of limitations?
Seems there is.
How does the law get around the law (statute of limitations) to get indictments and convictions?
Do you feel as if Masterson was wronged?
7712 -
Newname wrote:
The women said Masterson drugged and raped them in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003 at his house in the Hollywood Hills.
No more statute of limitations?
Seems there is.
How does the law get around the law (statute of limitations) to get indictments and convictions?
Prosecutors were able to file the charge under a “one-strike” sex crimes law that extends the statute of limitations for multiple forcible rapes.
632 -
legalbeagal wrote:
Newname wrote:
The women said Masterson drugged and raped them in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003 at his house in the Hollywood Hills.
No more statute of limitations?
Seems there is.
How does the law get around the law (statute of limitations) to get indictments and convictions?
Prosecutors were able to file the charge under a “one-strike” sex crimes law that extends the statute of limitations for multiple forcible rapes.
Don't see that in findlaw.
The statute of limitations exists for a reason.
These claims are 20 years old and I see no evidence that was presented at trial in the article. Seems the only evidence are the claims of the women.
9109 -
You're forgetting this forum in full of incels, meaning they always side with the rapist.
10131 -
Newname wrote:
Don't see that in findlaw.
The statute of limitations exists for a reason.
These claims are 20 years old and I see no evidence that was presented at trial in the article. Seems the only evidence are the claims of the women.
So you do feel as if he was wronged?
That isn't hard to believe knowing your posting history.
5111 -
He has a long predatory history wrote:
Newname wrote:
The women said Masterson drugged and raped them in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003 at his house in the Hollywood Hills.
No more statute of limitations?
Seems there is.
How does the law get around the law (statute of limitations) to get indictments and convictions?
Do you feel as if Masterson was wronged?
No idea as to whether he did this or not. No evidence presented in the article which means, in all likelihood, none presented at trial. Just accusations.
Did these women come forward 20 years ago? Were rape kits performed?
1681 -
He has a long predatory history wrote:
Newname wrote:
Don't see that in findlaw.
The statute of limitations exists for a reason.
These claims are 20 years old and I see no evidence that was presented at trial in the article. Seems the only evidence are the claims of the women.
So you do feel as if he was wronged?
That isn't hard to believe knowing your posting history.
Right. Asking for evidence and questioning official narratives must scare you
2152 -
Knew this thread would bring out at least 1 incel.
6819 -
He is a POS wrote:
Knew this thread would bring out at least 1 incel.
What is the evidence that he committed these rapes 20 years ago?
2553 -
He has a long predatory history wrote:
Newname wrote:
The women said Masterson drugged and raped them in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003 at his house in the Hollywood Hills.
No more statute of limitations?
Seems there is.
How does the law get around the law (statute of limitations) to get indictments and convictions?
Do you feel as if Masterson was wronged?
He may have not been wronged but he Will be raped.
2410 -
No way am I spending 30 years in prison. Would hang myself first chance I got.
103 -
I looked into what the evidence against him was.
Even found this article called what evidence got him convicted.
Read the whole article. Not one mention of any evidence. Just accusations.
1647 -
Newname wrote:
I looked into what the evidence against him was.
Even found this article called what evidence got him convicted.
Read the whole article. Not one mention of any evidence. Just accusations.
The guy seems like a POS but not one iota of evidence mentioned.
1716 -
Accusations were made.
Accusations were investigated.
Accusations were found to be credible.
Masterson was tried in court.
Masterson was found guilty by a jury of his peers.
8911 -
I assume his legal counsel lacked the insight of you and a pop culture reporter for Sportskeeda.
672 -
He has a long predatory history wrote:
Accusations were made.
Accusations were investigated.
Accusations were found to be credible.
Masterson was tried in court.
Masterson was found guilty by a jury of his peers.
What is the evidence...DNA? Eyewitnesses? Corroboration? Confession? Haven't seen anything yet.
1837 -
Newname wrote:
He has a long predatory history wrote:
Do you feel as if Masterson was wronged?
No idea as to whether he did this or not. No evidence presented in the article which means, in all likelihood, none presented at trial. Just accusations.
Did these women come forward 20 years ago? Were rape kits performed?
Apparently, there was sufficient evidence presented to the jury to find him guilty on two counts of rape. You were not at the trial. How do you know no evidence was presented?
439 -
He is a POS wrote:
Knew this thread would bring out at least 1 incel.
I disagree with newname, but those of you that start using "incel" to describe everyone that disagrees with you, come across as stupid people who can't win an argument on the basis of facts, so attempt to shut down an argument by name calling.
7518
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.