Don’t forget that Drive to Survive made its mark without the big names agreeing to be interviewed/followed in the first season (or two?). Their formula, pun fully intended, worked doubly well because when it brought fans to the sport it taught them to follow the mid-pack and bottom-pack narratives and subplots, which is extremely nuanced for any fan let alone a new fan. if you bring a new fan to any sport and say this one guy/team has won 90% of everything for the last 8 years, you’ll struggle to engage them in “why to care”. Drive To Survive pushed multiple “reasons to care”.
Track fans know there are similarly amazing other reasons to care, and I hope any documentary avoids the trap of front-runner focus only. it’s already not looking great by being a sprinter focus to begin, but I guess they had to pick broad or narrow and they went narrow.
probably more subplots the more you increase in distance. The day when Abbot major marathon coverage realizes more shoe/entry buying hobby joggers would care more about video feeds and tracking of: that 1500m runner that’s incredibly crushing his first marathon, that YouTuber that is setting a personal best at the end of their 6 month video series, the best college runner in the field, the leading blue collar club runner, the leading junior, etc, etc. instead of 1.5 hours of the same three elites that broke away in the first 5 streets.