yeah funnily enough right back at that 10.10 level that he was at prior to Tokyo when you factor in the slight headwind (-0.9 means an adjusted 10.15).
Enough said really unless we want to play the convenient "injury" card - yawn.
yeah funnily enough right back at that 10.10 level that he was at prior to Tokyo when you factor in the slight headwind (-0.9 means an adjusted 10.15).
Enough said really unless we want to play the convenient "injury" card - yawn.
He ran multiple sub-10s before Tokyo. The surprise was him getting to 9.80, as opposed to somewhere around 9.95
Prior to 2021 his best was 10.03 - 2018,2019,2020 his season bests (of multiple 100's) was 10.08, 10.03, 10.10.
In 2021, he ran 9.95 in a small Italian meet and 9.99 in Monaco which was his only sub 10 prior to stepping foot on the track in Tokyo. I know literally that is "multiple" times but I don't think that's you really meant right? Because the discussion is, was he a solid sub 10 performer before suddenly ripping off 9.80 to win the Olympic title (12th fastest time ever) and the answer to that is not even close.
So he never broke 10 before 2021 then ran 9.8 to win an olympic gold. I don't need to know anything else about Marcell Jacobs.
yeah funnily enough right back at that 10.10 level that he was at prior to Tokyo when you factor in the slight headwind (-0.9 means an adjusted 10.15).
Enough said really unless we want to play the convenient "injury" card - yawn.
Prior to 2021 his best was 10.03 - 2018,2019,2020 his season bests (of multiple 100's) was 10.08, 10.03, 10.10.
In 2021, he ran 9.95 in a small Italian meet and 9.99 in Monaco which was his only sub 10 prior to stepping foot on the track in Tokyo. I know literally that is "multiple" times but I don't think that's you really meant right? Because the discussion is, was he a solid sub 10 performer before suddenly ripping off 9.80 to win the Olympic title (12th fastest time ever) and the answer to that is not even close.
So he never broke 10 before 2021 then ran 9.8 to win an olympic gold. I don't need to know anything else about Marcell Jacobs.
No. It's more interesting. It was boring when Bolt was competing. Right now, you can't tell who will win, which makes it fun and have you glued to the edge of your seat.
yeah funnily enough right back at that 10.10 level that he was at prior to Tokyo when you factor in the slight headwind (-0.9 means an adjusted 10.15).
Enough said really unless we want to play the convenient "injury" card - yawn.
He ran multiple sub-10s before Tokyo. The surprise was him getting to 9.80, as opposed to somewhere around 9.95
Not true. He rarely dropped sub 10s and definitely not anything close to the time he ran in Tokyo. But heck, he had a nutritionist in 2021. I suspect he would be running 9.6s now if the nutritionist was still around.
He already won 60m indoor worlds and 100m at Euros in 2022
2023 has not been as bright, as he has only gotten 2nd at nationals and 2nd at Euros over 60m. Now with this "injury" I suspect he will not be in contention at Euros or worlds this outdoor season
Prior to 2021 his best was 10.03 - 2018,2019,2020 his season bests (of multiple 100's) was 10.08, 10.03, 10.10.
In 2021, he ran 9.95 in a small Italian meet and 9.99 in Monaco which was his only sub 10 prior to stepping foot on the track in Tokyo. I know literally that is "multiple" times but I don't think that's you really meant right? Because the discussion is, was he a solid sub 10 performer before suddenly ripping off 9.80 to win the Olympic title (12th fastest time ever) and the answer to that is not even close.
So he never broke 10 before 2021 then ran 9.8 to win an olympic gold. I don't need to know anything else about Marcell Jacobs.
I should’ve said sub-10 type performances even though it was 2. 10.01 (-1.0) and 10.05 (-.8) are pretty much there. Considering he raced 5 finals his results indicated 9.9x form. I agree the jump was a lot but in 2021 indoors and outdoors I think he showed he was in 9.9x/6.5x shape consistently. Not 10.10 shape, which was before 2021 I agree.