The San Fran Chronicle has an article under the Science banner on the two trans women at the state meet. It has the following title and sub-title.
Attacks on trans athletes have little basis in science
Experts say a paucity of research on transgender athletes makes it difficult to determine if trans women actually are faster or stronger. The science is even murkier for young athletes.
Here is the opening paragraph:
Two female runners competing in a state high school championship this weekend have come under attack because people believe they are transgender and therefore may have an unfair advantage. But the science is far from clear as to whether trans athletes are actually faster or stronger than their cisgender peers, experts say.
Far from clear?
Paucity of research?
Why do we need research? The biological male world records in every sport of consequence are significantly better than the biologcial female world records. Or how about this? If the two trans athletes, ran the same same when they were on the boys teams (which they competed on in the past). they wouldn't have made the state meet. In every single event, it's WAY harder to make states for biological males than biological females whether they are gay or straight.
Game over.
Repeat after me. A trans woman is a trans woman. They aren't biological females and shouldn't be in female sport.
And they should be ashamed for the title. Calling criticism of a biological male qualifying for state as an attack is disgraceful.
Sadly, it's behind a paywall:
Here is a summary: