I am qualified in law. You aren't. A "narrative", as you use it, is not a case. Your flannel here is a "narrative". Alberto takes expert legal advice. Being expert is something you know nothing about. But by all means, go ahead and tell him he should sue, because you understand "narratives". I think I know what blunt response you will get.
I never said Alberto should sue. I am much more qualified as a legal expert than you are. You are too slow to even grasp that the telling of a narrative is a huge part of what trial lawyers do. Some of you are so slow that you appear to believe a narrative is a false story. Your legal education appears to consist of watching a few true crime shows. And even then you didn’t assimilate much of what you saw.
You are hung up on semantics; on your misunderstanding of a word, as though that word is crucial to how a court case works. A "narrative" is a term in popular culture that applies to anything offered as an account or explanation of events. It is what Trump and his followers indulged in to try to explain his election loss. It was of course false. Any half-baked theory can be a "narrative". A "narrative" is not a case; the law requires much more than that. Even if it were plausible, on its own a narrative doesn't cut it. A court case requires evidence in accordance with the relevant law that meets a standard of proof. A narrative need not do that and mostly doesn't - as we see with many examples in the media and public life, and as you show with your false "narrative" here. In particular, in relation to the subject of the thread, there is no "narrative" that Salazar can rely upon to sue; he would need to build a case to do that. He doesn't have it.
I never said Alberto should sue. I am much more qualified as a legal expert than you are. You are too slow to even grasp that the telling of a narrative is a huge part of what trial lawyers do. Some of you are so slow that you appear to believe a narrative is a false story. Your legal education appears to consist of watching a few true crime shows. And even then you didn’t assimilate much of what you saw.
You are hung up on semantics; on your misunderstanding of a word, as though that word is crucial to how a court case works. A "narrative" is a term in popular culture that applies to anything offered as an account or explanation of events. It is what Trump and his followers indulged in to try to explain his election loss. It was of course false. Any half-baked theory can be a "narrative". A "narrative" is not a case; the law requires much more than that. Even if it were plausible, on its own a narrative doesn't cut it. A court case requires evidence in accordance with the relevant law that meets a standard of proof. A narrative need not do that and mostly doesn't - as we see with many examples in the media and public life, and as you show with your false "narrative" here. In particular, in relation to the subject of the thread, there is no "narrative" that Salazar can rely upon to sue; he would need to build a case to do that. He doesn't have it.
With your lower IQ on display with every post, I am playing the fool by getting in the mud with you. No more…
You are hung up on semantics; on your misunderstanding of a word, as though that word is crucial to how a court case works. A "narrative" is a term in popular culture that applies to anything offered as an account or explanation of events. It is what Trump and his followers indulged in to try to explain his election loss. It was of course false. Any half-baked theory can be a "narrative". A "narrative" is not a case; the law requires much more than that. Even if it were plausible, on its own a narrative doesn't cut it. A court case requires evidence in accordance with the relevant law that meets a standard of proof. A narrative need not do that and mostly doesn't - as we see with many examples in the media and public life, and as you show with your false "narrative" here. In particular, in relation to the subject of the thread, there is no "narrative" that Salazar can rely upon to sue; he would need to build a case to do that. He doesn't have it.
With your lower IQ on display with every post, I am playing the fool by getting in the mud with you. No more…