Yawn said of course the shooter was black. Again, if that’s your instinctual response then you are not trying to fix anything. You have hatred in your heart.
Zero murders would be great. That's never going to happen.
Meanwhile, doesn't even make the top 100 in the things that kill people in America. Gun related suicide is 95th and suicides are over 3x the number of murders by any means.
Guns are a symptom of the problem not the cause and the problem is TINY considering there's 330,000,000 people in the country.
How worried are you about choking to death? How worried are you about being struck by lightning?
Both of those things are more likely to happen to you than being shot in America.
Yeah, reducing the 20,000 gun murders (non suicide) by abolishing the 2nd amendment would be bold, but it is the right thing to do.
You want to shoot a gun and maybe kill animals, fine, go check out a gun at a gun range, from an armorer, then return it when done.
First, most murders happen in the home. If you get rid of guns murderers will just use a different weapon. The 20,000 murders you think you're preventing won't be anywhere near 20,000.
Second, firearms prevent thousands of murders every year. The media doesn't rush to do a stories on prevention but studies have been done that put the number in the tens of thousands of crimes prevented.
Yawn said of course the shooter was black. Again, if that’s your instinctual response then you are not trying to fix anything. You have hatred in your heart.
Pretty sure I didn’t say that.
How is sarcastically saying that you never would’ve guessed the perp would be black different than saying of course the shooter was black?
Zero murders would be great. That's never going to happen.
Meanwhile, doesn't even make the top 100 in the things that kill people in America. Gun related suicide is 95th and suicides are over 3x the number of murders by any means.
Guns are a symptom of the problem not the cause and the problem is TINY considering there's 330,000,000 people in the country.
How worried are you about choking to death? How worried are you about being struck by lightning?
Both of those things are more likely to happen to you than being shot in America.
Yeah, reducing the 20,000 gun murders (non suicide) by abolishing the 2nd amendment would be bold, but it is the right thing to do.
You want to shoot a gun and maybe kill animals, fine, go check out a gun at a gun range, from an armorer, then return it when done.
Lol, cause no one can steal a gun checked out from a range.
Zero murders would be great. That's never going to happen.
Meanwhile, doesn't even make the top 100 in the things that kill people in America. Gun related suicide is 95th and suicides are over 3x the number of murders by any means.
Guns are a symptom of the problem not the cause and the problem is TINY considering there's 330,000,000 people in the country.
How worried are you about choking to death? How worried are you about being struck by lightning?
Both of those things are more likely to happen to you than being shot in America.
Yeah, reducing the 20,000 gun murders (non suicide) by abolishing the 2nd amendment would be bold, but it is the right thing to do.
You want to shoot a gun and maybe kill animals, fine, go check out a gun at a gun range, from an armorer, then return it when done.
No, it's not the right thing to do and it will never, ever happen in the USA, ever. People have the right to defend themselves against armed intruders and yes, those intruders will be armed.
The government would never be able to take away guns from US citizens, NOT going to happen. You live in a fairy tale world, not reality.
Do know how many women applied for a received CPL's last year alone? Do you know why they got them?
Critical thinking is NOT your specialty. Move to New Zealand or Australia if you don't like it here. Mr. Bidenette is NOT taking away our guns, NOT gonna happen.
Ever hear of the American Revolution? Does it ring a bell?
There are some really dumb people on these boards who are clueless on reality.
Yeah, reducing the 20,000 gun murders (non suicide) by abolishing the 2nd amendment would be bold, but it is the right thing to do.
You want to shoot a gun and maybe kill animals, fine, go check out a gun at a gun range, from an armorer, then return it when done.
First, most murders happen in the home. If you get rid of guns murderers will just use a different weapon. The 20,000 murders you think you're preventing won't be anywhere near 20,000.
Second, firearms prevent thousands of murders every year. The media doesn't rush to do a stories on prevention but studies have been done that put the number in the tens of thousands of crimes prevented.
I can’t believe people still use your logic.
America is awash in guns and America has a gun murder problem.
Or America has a huge amount of gun murders. But guns aren’t the problem? But guns are not the problem
First, most murders happen in the home. If you get rid of guns murderers will just use a different weapon. The 20,000 murders you think you're preventing won't be anywhere near 20,000.
Second, firearms prevent thousands of murders every year. The media doesn't rush to do a stories on prevention but studies have been done that put the number in the tens of thousands of crimes prevented.
I can’t believe people still use your logic.
America is awash in guns and America has a gun murder problem.
Or America has a huge amount of gun murders. But guns aren’t the problem? But guns are not the problem
You need help, serious help. Expand your brain a tad and maybe you will be able to think better. Good Luck!
First, most murders happen in the home. If you get rid of guns murderers will just use a different weapon. The 20,000 murders you think you're preventing won't be anywhere near 20,000.
Second, firearms prevent thousands of murders every year. The media doesn't rush to do a stories on prevention but studies have been done that put the number in the tens of thousands of crimes prevented.
I can’t believe people still use your logic.
America is awash in guns and America has a gun murder problem.
Or America has a huge amount of gun murders. But guns aren’t the problem? But guns are not the problem
You're not using any logic.
You're ignoring 90+ more deadly things and focusing on guns for some reason.
If you wanted to save lives you would be virtue signaling about banning alcohol or refined carbohyrdates not guns.
Guns are inanimate objects. Guns aren't responsible for anything.
The guy at Wal-Mart didn't kill a bunch people because he had a gun he killed a bunch of people because he was an @sshole.
Alcohol kills more people than guns by a factor of about 10.
Using your logic alcohol should be banned immediately and anyone who protests is a monster who wants people to die.
America is awash in guns and America has a gun murder problem.
Or America has a huge amount of gun murders. But guns aren’t the problem? But guns are not the problem
You're not using any logic.
You're ignoring 90+ more deadly things and focusing on guns for some reason.
If you wanted to save lives you would be virtue signaling about banning alcohol or refined carbohyrdates not guns.
Guns are inanimate objects. Guns aren't responsible for anything.
The guy at Wal-Mart didn't kill a bunch people because he had a gun he killed a bunch of people because he was an @sshole.
Alcohol kills more people than guns by a factor of about 10.
Using your logic alcohol should be banned immediately and anyone who protests is a monster who wants people to die.
The alcohol argument completely destroys the left's anti-gun argument. They will downvote it and disappear. If saving lives involves any personal inconvenience at all on their own part they always so "no thanks".
Several coworkers of the Walmart supervisor suspected of committing the deadly rampage inside a Chesapeake, Virginia, store said the shooter had exhibited odd and threatening behavior in the past.
America is awash in guns and America has a gun murder problem.
Or America has a huge amount of gun murders. But guns aren’t the problem? But guns are not the problem
You're not using any logic.
You're ignoring 90+ more deadly things and focusing on guns for some reason.
If you wanted to save lives you would be virtue signaling about banning alcohol or refined carbohyrdates not guns.
Guns are inanimate objects. Guns aren't responsible for anything.
The guy at Wal-Mart didn't kill a bunch people because he had a gun he killed a bunch of people because he was an @sshole.
Alcohol kills more people than guns by a factor of about 10.
Using your logic alcohol should be banned immediately and anyone who protests is a monster who wants people to die.
If the perpetrator bulldozed over a bunch of people in the parking lot, or stabbed his victims to death, the libs wouldn't be making threads about the weapon he used. If the perpetrator was a straight, white, Republican male, they wouldn't be calling others hateful for pointing out his identity. They don't care about death or "hate," it's just about scoring political points.
If people really gave a sh!t about preventing these mass killings, they would be talking about the various social factors which lead to them. Nobody wants to talk about the hypercompetitive, isolated, consumeristic society we live in which drives those who at the bottom of the hierarchy (and may also have neural predispositions towards aggression) towards acts of violence. If you take one look at the people committing these shootings, you can tell they're almost always lonely, alienated individuals (perhaps for good reason, though) with a history of mental illness and/or trauma. Yet all people want to talk about is superficial gun laws, it's just stupid.