Gotta say valby. Seems to be better at interviews and speaking.
-
1886
-
Like LRC would have the first clue… have you seen this place?
864 -
Guys, please spell Tuohy’s last name correctly!!!! What more do you need her to do to get it spelled right????
Please!!!
Tell me!!!
I wanna know!!!
1518 -
mad max wrote:
Are you kidding me, Parker doesn't know how to cut tangents or know where finish line was in post race interview. What part of interview makes her seem bright? All I see is a barbie doll.
and who was more marketable for Nike, Coleen Quigley or Courtney Frerichs?
364 -
yeahbut.. wrote:
mad max wrote:
Are you kidding me, Parker doesn't know how to cut tangents or know where finish line was in post race interview. What part of interview makes her seem bright? All I see is a barbie doll.
and who was more marketable for Nike, Coleen Quigley or Courtney Frerichs?
Quigley communicates much better than Valby and Frerichs and Quigley is also much better at marketing herself than they are.
176 -
no, we're not comparing Quigley and Frerichs vs. Valby, I was talking about comparing Quigley vs. Frerichs
One is conventionally attractive while still having performed at a high level, the other is not as conventionally attractive but has a higher accolade in the sport. Same situation with these NCAA girls.
Quigley is Valby vs. Katelyn is Frerichs
I'm not saying it's right, but if they are both highly achieving athletes then brands will obviously be drawn to the more attractive one2429 -
IT'S VALBYMANIA!!!
399 -
yeahbut.. wrote:
no, we're not comparing Quigley and Frerichs vs. Valby, I was talking about comparing Quigley vs. Frerichs
One is conventionally attractive while still having performed at a high level, the other is not as conventionally attractive but has a higher accolade in the sport. Same situation with these NCAA girls.
Quigley is Valby vs. Katelyn is Frerichs
I'm not saying it's right, but if they are both highly achieving athletes then brands will obviously be drawn to the more attractive oneI got what you were saying. But you didn't understand what I was saying.
Quigley is not equivalent to Valby. They are both attractive but Quigley communicates much better than Valby and Quigley markets herself much better than Valby.
Looks are important to brands but it's not only about looks.
As far as Tuohy vs Valby, Tuohy right now is more important to a brand because she has a lot more name recognition. That might change by the time they graduate, who knows.
263 -
Have them team up. Two are better than one.
81 -
Val bee model wrote:
Tuyoy is topped out. She is a high school phenom who Kade minor improvements while Calby made huge gains and model attractive. And Touy has a weird name that nobody can spell. Parker Valby is a model type name.
Gosh darn it guys!!!Spell her name right for God’s sake!!!!!!
157 -
Man you guys are creepy. It’s fine saying Valby’s more attractive but some of the posts here explain why female pros dislike this site
Tuohy has a much better brand right now so it’s definitely her for the next 3-5 years unless Valby gets a world medal/does more social media stuff that is well received
558 -
some people here are high school runners and in college. it's normal to comment on the looks of hot college / HS senior runners
725 -
Jordan Levesque wrote:
Gotta say valby. Seems to be better at interviews and speaking.
Only sport where the fans actively root for the stars to fail.
86
6 posts were removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.