She cheated! She was found guilty! She was banned! Whatever else she did doesn't matter! That is the way it should work. Any performances before the bust should be taken away!
-
2124
-
Because just like all of the 'evidence' against NOP and Salazar it's based entirely on second hand information and circumstantial evidence.
ZERO people involved with NOP have EVER tested positive for PED's. None. NADA. Zilch.
Bowerman has one though....1220 -
wazzu1452 wrote:
Because just like all of the 'evidence' against NOP and Salazar it's based entirely on second hand information and circumstantial evidence.
ZERO people involved with NOP have EVER tested positive for PED's. None. NADA. Zilch.
Bowerman has one though....
This makes no sense. She was caught.
311 -
All cheaters should be wiped from the books wrote:
She cheated! She was found guilty! She was banned! Whatever else she did doesn't matter! That is the way it should work. Any performances before the bust should be taken away!
Mary Decker? For one year when she was 37
1112 -
In 1997 when her career was over!! She also fought the IAAF and the US Olympic committee, claiming the test was flawed and could’ve produced a false positive due to the use of birth control pills.
All of her best work was done prior to 1983 anyway.
LEGEND1819 -
50
-
No end to this DRUGS....is there?
Wow!
20 -
wazzu1452 wrote:
In 1997 when her career was over!! She also fought the IAAF and the US Olympic committee, claiming the test was flawed and could’ve produced a false positive due to the use of birth control pills.
All of her best work was done prior to 1983 anyway.
LEGEND
Hi Mary. You were busted! Game over. Once a cheater always a cheater. She was or you were busted. The end!
1411 -
FFS she was great from age 14 on. Her unfortunate involvement with Sleazy Al was at the very end of a very long career. Nice troll attempt though, OP.
237 -
carmine9 wrote:
All cheaters should be wiped from the books wrote:
She cheated! She was found guilty! She was banned! Whatever else she did doesn't matter! That is the way it should work. Any performances before the bust should be taken away!
Mary Decker? For one year when she was 37
What? So now if an athlete is busted once they can still be considered a legend? She was caught. She knew the risk! Now anytime anyone says her name, she will be know as a drug cheat.
127 -
Yessiree Bob wrote:
FFS she was great from age 14 on. Her unfortunate involvement with Sleazy Al was at the very end of a very long career. Nice troll attempt though, OP.
She was a cheater! I really think all these positive Mary Decker post are people that know her. SHE IS A CHEAT! For all we know she was cheating all along. She was caught and history will always know her as a FN chester!
126 -
Was it a Rupp certified salad bar though?
50 -
All cheaters should be wiped from the books wrote:
Yessiree Bob wrote:
FFS she was great from age 14 on. Her unfortunate involvement with Sleazy Al was at the very end of a very long career. Nice troll attempt though, OP.
She was a cheater! I really think all these positive Mary Decker post are people that know her. SHE IS A CHEAT! For all we know she was cheating all along. She was caught and history will always know her as a FN chester!
I don't know her and I doubt she was cheating when she was America's best runner at 14 years old.
193 -
Yessiree Bob wrote:
FFS she was great from age 14 on. Her unfortunate involvement with Sleazy Al was at the very end of a very long career. Nice troll attempt though, OP.
LOL. She joined Athletics West right after her sophomore year.
Also lol at everyone who comes up with the good old "but she doped only once" excuse.
146 -
The cheating doper Mary Decker needs to have all her records and medals stripped, she needs to pay compensation to her victims and she needs some jail time.
810 -
This is Jim Kiler wrote:
Great stuff, Kiler. Can you drop some pages, please? Looked like an interesting read. It is a bit sobering to think she had already gone through the calf surgeries by the age of 19.
30 -
Meant *more pages.
00 -
hey yo it was wrote:
Meant *more pages.
I was genuinely interested to find out how the race ended up. The writer was pretty good.
95F…wonder what the dew point was.00 -
wazzu1452 wrote:
Because just like all of the 'evidence' against NOP and Salazar it's based entirely on second hand information and circumstantial evidence.
Testing positive for absurd testosterone levels is not “second hand information and circumstantial evidence”.
162 -
#20
This post was removed.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.